Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Gaul v. Brown

    53 Me. 496 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

    Cummings v. Chandler, 26 Maine, 376; Com. v. Kimball, 21 Pick., 376 ; Leighton v. Walker, 9 N. H., 59. Where a penalty is changed by a subsequent act, the statute imposing the original penalty is impliedly repealed. … Nichols v. Squire, 5 Pick., 168 , Plaintiff nonsuit. Kent, Walton, Dickerson, Barrows and Danforth, JJ., concurred.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    158 S.W.2d 1018 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1942

    Brown, which was accordingly done; and the style of the case upon the docket was changed from The State of Texas v. Robert Lawrence, No. 121, to The State of Texas v. Orrin J. Brown, No. 121. … In the case of Chase v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cushman

    173 Mass. 368 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 18, 1899

    Kernochan v. Murray, 111 N. Y. 306 . Drummond v. Crane, ubi supra. … Kernochan v. Murray, 111 N. Y. 306 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    169 A.3d 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2017

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ashley

    16 Nev. 311 · Nevada Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

    (Barnes v. Sabron, 10 Nev. 247 .) The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mount v. Brown

    33 Miss. 566 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1857

    Lambkin v. Crawford, 7 Ala. Rep. (N. S.) 153. The objection, that the administrator should treat the sale as valid and complete, and sue the purchaser for the money, will not bear examination.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kolars v. Brown

    108 Minn. 60 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 14, 1909

    Brown» C. O. Kolars, who had a claim against William W. … Brown, brought suit against him, and on December 19, 1907, served garnishment papers upon the administrator for the purpose of reaching Brown’s share of the estate.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    340 So. 2d 575 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 22, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Clark v. Brown

    141 Cal. 93 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1903

    with William Brown, to which contract the defendant Best Manufacturing Company was not a party. … This was so decided in Duncan v. Hawn, 104 Cal. 10 . 4. There was no error in giving judgment for costs against the defendant the Best Manufacturing Company.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Osborn v. Brown

    361 So. 2d 82 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 21, 1978

    Teele v. Gravlee , supra. … There being no cross-appeal from the verdict for defendant Brown in Case 77-202, no issue to Brown is before us.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Markham v. Brown

    37 Ga. 277 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 15, 1867

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    43 Tex. Crim. 411 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 1902

    See Brown v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 417 . … Foster v. State, 25 Texas Crim. App., 543. In Jay v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Greener v. Brown

    323 Ill. 221 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1926

    (Seney v. Knight, 292 Ill. 206 ; Kitson v. Farwell, 132 id. 327 ; First Nat. Bank of Flora v. Burkett, 101 id. 391.) … (Jernberg v. Mix, 199 Ill. 254 .) The case alleged in the declaration was one charging malice and not merely an action for the recovery of money.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    141 Ohio St. 3d 1459 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Williams

    141 Ohio St. 3d 1458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2015

    Brown, the 3rd party beneficiary”. Motion denied. On respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motion to expedite. Motion denied. On relator’s motion to strike opposition of respondent. Motion denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McCaffrey

    143 Me. 221 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1948

    Pelletier v. Langlois, et al., 130 Me. 486, 490 ; 157 Atl. 577 . … Booth Brothers & Hurricane Island Granite Company v. Smith, 115 Me. 89, 93 ; 97 Atl. 826 . Exception 5. To the exclusion of evidence that one Mr.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    76 Ind. 85 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1881

    The indictment charges that “Marcus Brown and Cassius Brown, on the 15th day of July, 1878, at the county and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully, maliciously and mischievously injure, and cause to be injured, … In the case of The State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • West v. Brown

    165 Ga. 187 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 17, 1927

    Civil Code (1910), § 4317; Williams v. Stewart, 115 Ga. 864 ( 42 S. E. 256 ). 2. Besides, the claim which one of the plaintiffs paid was not an illegal demand. … Rivers v. Wright, 117 Ga. 81 ( 43 S. E. 499 ) ; Brown v. Southern Ry. Co., 140 Ga. 539 ( 79 S. E. 152 ) ; Baggerly v. Bainbridge State Bank, 160 Ga. 556 (3-a) ( 128 S. E. 766 ) ; King v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kelly

    140 Vt. 336 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Nov 3, 1981

    We upheld that judgment in Brown v. Pilini, 128 Vt. 324 , 262 A.2d 479 (1970). … Crooker v. Hutchinson, 2 D. Chip. 117, 123 (Vt. 1824).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Byam

    65 Iowa 374 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 11, 1884

    This view is sustained by McDole v. Purdy, 23 Iowa, 277 ; Bradley v. Bosley, 1 Barb., Ch., 125. 2. evidence: misused party.' II.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.