Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

1.85s

  • State v. Brown

    109 N.J. 58 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    75 N.J. 17 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 12, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Isler v. Brown

    196 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1929

    suppression of tbe truth or tbe suggestion of what is false can be proved, in a fact material to tbe contract, tbe party injured may have relief against tbe contract.” 18 Johns., 405 ; Black’s Law Diet., p. 1040; McNair v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    71 N.J. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 20, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    70 N.J. 514 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    68 N.J. 173 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Lambe

    119 Iowa 404 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 2, 1903

    Sweezey v. Stetson, 67 Iowa, 481 ; Belanger v. Hersey, 90 Ill. 73 . … Hines v. Mullins, 25 Ga. 696 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    66 N.J. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    61 N.J. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    59 N.J. 295 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Minor

    305 Ark. 556 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1991

    At trial, plaintiff Gene Brown testified that his right to quiet title was based upon his marriage to plaintiff Shirley Brown. … Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Davis, 278 Ark. 387 , 646 S.W.2d 336 (Supp. Op. at 393-A 1983). Affirmed on direct appeal; cross-appeal dismissed.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    53 N.J. 23 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 1968

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State v. Brown

    166 So. 3d 998 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 19, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Boone

    129 Kan. 786 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Feb 8, 1930

    In the Brown case a grantor made a deed of described land to Laura A. … (Bryant v. Flanner, 99 Kan. 472 , 162 Pac. 280 .) To determine the quantity of interest which the testator intended his daughter Nellie should take, the will must be considered in its entirety.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    201 Ga. 751 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 7, 1947

    See Felder v. State, 149 Ga. 538 (101 S. E. *752 179); Jenkins v. State, 153 Ga. 305 ( 111 S. E. 915 ); Mars v. State, 163 Ga. 43 ( 135 S. E. 410 ); Davis v. State, 178 Ga. 203 .( 172 S. E. 559 ), No. 15675.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Brown

    184 Iowa 1288 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 14, 1918

    Brown, for the stated consideration of $1,000; that this was recorded, December 11, 1893. Defendant Brown claims that he, through himself and tenants, took and has ever since held possession of the land. … As said in Ault v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mann

    71 Cal. 192 · California Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1886

    The proceedings had after the transfer of the note and mortgage by plaintiff (Charles Brown) to Adolphus Brown, with the suit thereon, must be disregarded, because Charles Brown, being the administrator of the estate of Abel … Mann, could not, under the name of Adolphus Brown, have an action for his own benefit against himself as administrator to foreclose the mortgage.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kausche

    98 Wash. 470 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1917

    In Nichols v. … In Goodrich v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    107 N.J. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Bennett

    55 Ga. 189 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 15, 1875

    This was a motion to set aside a decree made by a court of equity in favor of Brown, the complainant, against Bennett, one of the defendants therein. .The motion to set aside,the decree was based on two grounds: First,that … To which judgment and decision of the court setting aside said decree, Brown, the complainant in the bill, excepted.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.