Case law

Johnson v. Brown

51 Ga. 498 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 15, 1874

Shafford v. Brown

49 Wash. 307 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1908

Egbert v. Blumberg, 46 Wash. 270 , 89 Pac. 708 , held that part of the act of 1903 (Laws 1903, p. 246, ch. 133), which assumed to create the office of county fruit inspector to be unconstitutional and void. … They recognized Brown .as county fruit inspector by appealing from his decision to the state commissioner of horticulture.

Brown v. Cohn

95 Wis. 90 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1897

The question principally argued on this appeal, and which seems to be decisive of it, is whether defendants’ title under the tax deeds is concluded by the judgment in Brown v. Lincoln County et al. … The judgment in Brown v. Lincoln County et al. swept away all foundation from under the tax deeds, and left them without support in previous proceedings.

Brown v. French

159 Ala. 645 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 8, 1909

. — Brown v. … Rep. 26 ; Eldridge v. Grice, 132 Ala. 667, 668 , 32 South. 683 ; Schamagel v. Whitehurst, 103 Ala. 260, 263 , 15 South. 611 ; Hodges v. Winston, 95 Ala. 514, 517 , 11 South. 200 , 36 Am. St. Rep. 241 ; Hill’s Adm’r, v.

McCoy v. Brown

246 So. 2d 542 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1971

Brown v. Loden

229 So. 2d 62 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1969

Worsham v. Brown

4 Ga. 284 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 15, 1848

Brown never become the owner of the executions, which he is seeking to inforce, until four years from this date. He cannot interfere. What did he purchase ? … If this be true, the fund never can be reached by Brown. Had it remained in the hands of Worsham, Brown might, perhaps, proceed against Worsham as the Trustee of Cox, for the amount of this fund.

Bruno v. Brown

414 Pa. 361 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 1964

Commonwealth v. Petrillo, 341 Pa. 209 , 19 A. 2d 288 (1941); Zubrod v. Kuhn, 357 Pa. 200 , 53 A. 2d 604 (1947). The issue on trial should not be confused through the introduction of collateral matters. See, City Prod. … Corp. v. Bennett Bros., 390 Pa. 398 , 135 A. 2d 924 (1957), and Stormer v. Alberts Const. Co., 401 Pa. 461 , 165 A. 2d 87 (1960).

Brown v. Herman

75 Wash. 2d 816 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1969

Hebb v. Severson, supra. … Milton v. Crawford, 65 Wash. 145 , 118 P. 32 (1911); Moore v. Elliott, 76 Wash. 520 , 136 P. 849 (1913); Hebb v. Severson, supra.

Brown v. Vonnahme

343 N.W.2d 445 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 18, 1984

Beginning with Lamb v. … Delashmut v.

Crippen v. Brown

11 Paige Ch. 628 · New York Court of Chancery · May 6, 1845

The decision on this subject, in the case of Rogers v.

Murphy v. Brown

131 Tex. 121 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1938

Madge Brown et vir v. J. V. Murphy. He also prays for writs of prohibition or injunction against Honorable Claude Hutch-ins, Judge of the District Court of Titus County, J. H. Brown and wife, Mrs. … Madge Brown, and their attorneys, to desist from any further proceedings in cause No. 3767, styled Brown et al. v.

Brown v. Lawrence

57 Mass. 390 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1849

Brown and another, heirs of Samuel L., the youngest son of the testator. … Childs v. Russell, 11 Met. 16 . A similar doctrine, we think, was held to govern in a recent English case. Doe v. Prigg, 8 B. & Cr. 231.

State v. Brown

290 Mo. 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1921

Levin testified, that he got a good look at Brown, and identified him; that he had seen Brown before and had known his name for a couple of years; that a few weeks later, he saw defendant on the street, and had him arrested … [State v. Kelsay, 228 S.W. (Mo.) l.c. 756, and cases cited.] We have made a very full statement of the facts heretofore, and it will only be necessary to refer to same as occasion requires.

Brown v. Connolly

62 Cal. 2d 391 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1965

Victor Brown, plaintiff and appellant, is a minor child 1 who while riding his bicycle was struck by a car driven by Gregory Peter Connolly, defendant and respondent. … (Brown v. Connolly (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 582 [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 57 ].) The second trial also resulted in a judgment for defendant.

Goodrich v. Brown

30 Iowa 291 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 16, 1870

Garvin v. Wells, 8 Iowa, 286 . It is incumbent upon a party alleging error to make it affirmatively appear. In a court of inferior jurisdiction tbe record must show tbe facts which confer tbe jurisdiction. State v.

Allen v. Brown

124 Mass. 77 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 27, 1878

Union Bank v. Willis, 8 Met, 504. Brown v. Butler, 99 Mass. 179 . Way v. Butterworth, 108 Mass. 509 . … Hunt v. Bridgham, 2 Pick. 581 . Horne v. Bodwell, 5 Gray, 457 . Wilson v. Foot, 11 Met. 285 . Agricultural Bank v. Bishop, 6 Gray, 317 .

Brown v. State

559 P.2d 107 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1977

The superior court denied Brown’s application and this appeal followed. … Mitchem v. United States, 193 F.2d 55 (5 Cir. 1951); United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183 (4 Cir. 1962).

Brown v. Floding

173 Ga. 400 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 17, 1931

Brown v. Derway

109 Vt. 37 · Supreme Court of Vermont · May 4, 1937

Hathaway v. Hagan, 64 Vt. 135 , 24 Atl. 131 . Averill v. Vermont Valley Railroad, 88 Vt. 293 , 92 Atl. 220 , is an illustration of its use for this purpose. … L. 1674; Davis v. Union Meeting House Society, 93 Vt. 520 , 108 Atl. 704 , and eases cited.