Case law

Taylor v. Brown

165 Ga. 698 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 17, 1928

The case differs on its facts from the cases of Settle v. Alison, 8 Ga. 201 ( 52 Am. D. 393 ); Wood v. McGuire, 17 Ga. 361 ( 63 Am. D. 246 ). 2. Properly construed, the deed made by D. H. … Harris v. Cannon, 6 Ga. 382 ; Howard v. Tucker, 65 Ga. 323 ; Nathans v. Arkwright, 66 Ga. 179 ; Candler v. Clarke, 90 Ga. 550 ( 16 S. E. 645 ); Treadaway v. Richards, 92 Ga. 264 (3) ( 18 S. E. 25 ); Bentley v.

State v. Brown

113 N.J. 382 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1988

Brown v. Franklin

157 Miss. 38 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1930

In support of the contention that the court erred in requiring the executrix, to execute a bond, appellant relies principally upon the cases of Martin v. Martin, 69 Miss. 315 , 13 So. 267 ; Hill v. … Godwin, 114 Miss. 324 , 75 So. 122 ; Rife v. Rife, 154 Miss. 529 , 122 So. 739 .

Brown v. Wentworth

181 Mass. 49 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 1, 1902

Cranston v. Crane, 97 Mass. 459, 464 . … Chase, 130 Mass. 137 , and this is not a case where the advertisement was wrong, as in People’s Savings Bank v. Wunderlich, 178 Mass. 453 , and Fenner v. Tucker, 6 R. I. 551. See Bottineau v. Ætna Life Ins.

Brown v. Stevens

84 Idaho 432 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1962

I.C. § 72-201; Zimmerman v. Harris Lumber Company, 82 Idaho 187 , 350 P.2d 746 ; Sutton v. Brown’s Tie & Lumber Company, 82 Idaho 135 , 350 P.2d 345 ; Darvell v. … Darvell v. Wardner Industrial Union, supra; Jensen v. Bohemian Brew., Inc., supra; Neale v. Weaver, 60 Idaho 41 , 88 P.2d 522 ; Brooke v. Nolan, supra; Croy v. McFarland-Brown Lumber Co., 51 Idaho 32 , 1 P.2d 189 .

Brown v. State

256 Ga. 439 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 13, 1986

Woods v. State, 233 Ga. 495 ( 212 SE2d 322 ) (1975). See also Stitt v. State, 256 Ga. 155 ( 345 SE2d 578 ) (1986); Walker v. State, 254 Ga. 149 ( 327 SE2d 475 ) (1985). … Burk v. State, 234 Ga. 512 ( 216 SE2d 812 ) (1975). It was not error, nor was it prejudicial to Brown. Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part. All the Justices concur. 1 Brown was indicted on January 12, 1986.

State v. Brown

64 N.J.L. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1900

Zab riskie v. State, 14 Vroom 640 , 647. … Zabriskie v.

Woodridge v. . Brown

149 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1908

Thomas v. Simpson, 80 N. C., 4 . In Love v. Miller, 104 N. C., 582 , the contract was to sell cotton to be of “average grade of low middling,” etc. Held, a warranty that it would come up to the description. In Reiger v. … Critcher v. Porter McNeal Co., 135 N. C., 542 ; Allen v. Tompkins, 136 N. C., 208 .

State v. Brown

122 N.J. 342 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1990

Robards v. Brown

40 Ark. 423 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1883

"Within a year after the sale Robards tendered to Brown the amount of money required by the act, and sought to redeem. But Brown refused the money; Robards withheld possession, and Brown brought ejectment. … Van Hoffman v. Qnincy, 4 Wall. 535 ; White v. Hart; 13 Id., 646 ; Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Id., 314; Gunn v. Barry, 15 Id., 610; Edwards v. Kearzey, 96 U. S. 595 .

Rush v. Brown

187 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1940

Musick, County Supt., v. State ex rel. Miles, 185 Okla. 140 , 90 P. 2d 631 ; Drum-Standish Commission Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, 168 Okla. 400 , 31 P. 2d 843 . … Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare Commission and E. W. Marland, W. A. Pat Murphy, and Andrew Fraley, as members thereof, supra, Sterling Refining Co. et al. v.

State v. Brown

122 N.J. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1990

State v. Brown

Hawaii Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2016

HERBERT BROWN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000724; CR. … Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Herbert Brown’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on December 26, 2015, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 8, 2016. Barry L.

Young v. Brown

53 Wis. 333 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1881

In Day v. Elmore, 4 Wis., 190 , the use of the very indefinite formula, “ for value received,” was held sufficient. … It must be regarded as the settled law, and, for reasons stated by the present chief justice in Parry v. Spikes, 49 Wis., 384 , it should not now be disturbed. We do not doubt, however, that Eastman v.

Brown v. . McKee

108 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

In Ruggles v. … So in Hooks v.

Scott v. Brown

106 Ala. 604 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

. — The appellee, Brown, sued to recover a one-fifth interest in the lands described in the complaint. … In the case of Bibb v.

State v. Brown

122 N.J. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1990

People v. Brown

62 N.Y.2d 743 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 1984

State v. Brown

110 N.J. 199 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1988

Brown v. Jenks

247 Ala. 596 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1946

Hammac v. Hammac, 246 Ala. 111 , 19 So.2d 392, 393 ; see also Arnold v. Arnold, 246 Ala. 86 , 18 So.2d 730 ; Knowles v. Knowles, 246 Ala. 228 , 20 So. 2d 200 . … Sparkman v. Sparkman, 217 Ala. 41 , 114 So. 580 ; Decker V. Decker, 176 Ala. 299 , 58 So. 195 ; White v. White, ante, p. 405, 24 So.2d 763 .