Case law

State v. Brown

101 W. Va. 160 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926

State v. Chafin, 78 W. Va. 140 ; State v. Jones, 53 W. Va. 613 ; State v. Riffe, 10 W. Va. 794 . … In Boyd v. U.

Yarnell v. Brown

170 Ill. 362 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1897

(McJilton v. Love, 13 Ill. 486 ; Hughes v. Trahern, 64 id. 48.) The purchaser takes the judgment subject to all equities existing between the parties to it. … (Olds v. Cummings, 31 Ill. 188 ; Silverman v. Bullock, 98 id. 11; Himrod v. Gilman, 147 id. 293; Humble v. Curtis, 160 id. 193.) But in order to make that rule applicable the equities must be equal.

Brown v. State

135 Tex. Crim. 394 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 1938

The court in his qualification of such bill of exceptions states that the witness Dunsmore and such other person were working for the State Liquor Control Board, and such other party was a boy from this university, going … Stephens v. State, 96 S. W. 7 ; Trinkle v. State, 131 S. W. 583 . Not only is that true, but, where there is no dispute as to the fact of sale, an error in defining the term ‘sale’ is harmless. Homan v.

Brown v. Rushing

70 Ark. 111 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1902

Budd v. Bettison, 21 Ark. 582 ; Keith v. Freeman, 43 Ark. 296 . 2. … In Walnut v. Wade, 103 U.

Cline v. Brown

286 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1975

CLINE v. Bertram Ervin BROWN II. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 4, 1975. Wilson & Morrow, for the plaintiff. Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, for the defendant.

Brown v. Deford

83 Md. 297 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 27, 1896

Ratcliff v. Sangston, 18 Md. 391 ; Devries v. Hiss, 72 Md. 564 ; Riley v. Carter, 76 Md. 610 . There is nothing in the case of The Building Association v. … This is not a-proceeding against Brown & McKinney under the insolvent law, nor have they applied for its benefit. In the case of Castleberg v.

Brown v. . Buchanan

194 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1927

Tripp v. Little, 186 N. C., 215 ; Sullivan v. Blount, 165 N. C., 7 ; Hemphill v. Hemphill, 138 N. C., 504 . … In Hoge v. Lee, 184 N.

Brown v. State

220 Tenn. 709 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1968

In one of our first cases, Cooper v. … Such cases as Eason v. State, 65 Tenn; 466; and Ellis v. State, 92 Tenn. 85 , 20 S.W. 500 ; and others are cited.

Brown v. Tauzin

185 La. 86 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 30, 1936

Donaldson v. Hull, 7 Mart.(N.S.) 112; Lowry v. Erwin, 6th Rob. 192 , 39 Am.Dec. 556; Hill v. Bowden et al., 3 La.Ann. 258 ; Rhodes v. Hooper, 6 La.Ann. 355, 356 ; Stille v. Shull, 41 La.Ann. 816 , 6 So. 634 . … Emily Brown Gotmann, Rebecca Brown, and Frank Brown, and against the defendants Mrs. Dona Mae Tauzin, divorced wife of Paul E. Tauzin, and the said Paul E.

Ward v. Brown

87 Mo. 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

Johnson v. Outlaw, 56 Miss. 541 ; Wade v. Pettibone, 11 Ohio, 57; s. c., 14 Ohio, 563. … Brown, -and,- as was said-in Prichard v.

Brown v. Rice

29 Mo. 322 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1860

The evidence was that Brown did not accede to the defendant’s proposition, but asked for time to consider it. … If Brown was not bounpl, neither was Rice. But this view of the case was not left' to the jury. Judgment reversed and case remanded; the other judges concur.

Brown v. Woody

98 W. Va. 512 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1925

Reliance is placed upon Hufford v. Akers, 52 W. … In Snyder v. Collins et al., 164 N. W.

Warner v. Brown

231 Mass. 333 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 27, 1918

Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co. 242 U. S. 394, 401 . … See, in this connection, Wilson v. Mulloney, 185 Mass. 430 , Hawes v. Weeden, 180 Mass. 106 , and Johnson v. Von Scholley, 218 Mass. 454 .

Brown v. Ricketts

2 Johns. Ch. 425 · New York Court of Chancery · Apr 9, 1817

It was said, by Lord Hardwicke, in Pott v. … (Longman v. Calliford, 3 Anst. 807.) The motion is, accordingly, denied, with costs.

Brown v. State

141 Ala. 80 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

Gordon v. State, 71 Ala. 315; Hall v. State, 134 Ala. 90, 115 , and authorities there cited.

Rowland v. Brown

75 Iowa 679 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 12, 1888

Blair Town Lot & Land Co. v. Scott, 44 Iowa, 144; Poindexter v. Doolittle, 54 Iowa, 52 ; Vaughan v. Stone, 55 Iowa, 214 ; and Roberts v. … This was a sufficient compliance with the statute. *683 Johnson v. Brown, 71 Iowa, 609 ; Stull v. Moore, 70 Iowa, 150 . It is further objected that the county in which service was made is not shown in the return.

State v. Brown

65 Ohio St. 3d 1498 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1993

Brown v. State

120 Tex. Crim. 95 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1932

See Edwards v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 47 , 262 S. W., 742 ; Grant v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 437 , 254 S. W., 959 ; Dameron v. State, 97 Texas Crim. Rep., 172 , 260 S. W., 855 . … See Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, secs. 117, 184; Howard v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 498 , 36 S. W., 475 , 66 Am. St. Rep., 812 ; Forrester v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 245 , 42 S. W., 400 ; Guerrero v.

Brown v. State

23 Md. 503 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 1, 1865

opinion of this Court: The plaintiff in error was indicted, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel county, for having, on the 15th day of April 1865, unlawfully enticed and persuaded a negro ap~ *506 prentice, named George Brown

Brown v. Hoffmeister

71 Mo. 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1880