Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

1.49s

  • Brown v. State

    266 Ga. 723 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 28, 1996

    The case was docketed in this Court on December 5,1995 and orally argued on February 12, 1996. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 Brown v. … State, 266 Ga. 633 ( 469 SE2d 186 ) (1996). 4 Compare Barksdale v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rock

    99 Vt. 415 · Supreme Court of Vermont · May 5, 1926

    See Felker v. Caldwell, 188 Ind. 364 , 123 N. E. 794 ; Reemelin v. Mosby, 47 Ohio St. 570 , 26 N. E. 717 ; State ex rel. Garrison v. Brough et al., 94 Ohio St. 115 , 113 N. E. 683 ; Black v. Lambert (Tex. Civ. … W. 704 ; Beck v. Keiden et al., 215 Mich. 13 , 183 N. W. 742 ; Poyntz, etc. v. Shackleford, 107 Ky. 546 , 54 S. W. 855 ; Hollar v. Cornett, 144 Ky. 420 , 138 S. W. 298 ; Young v. Dudney (Tex. Civ. App.), 140 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    283 Kan. 658 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Apr 27, 2007

    State v. Brown, 34 Kan. App. 2d 746 , 124 P.3d 1035 (2005). One member of the panel (Assented on the *659 speedy trial issue. … Brown’s blood was tested and was found to contain a blood alcohol level of 0.10 grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood. More details are set forth in State v. Brown, 34 Kan. App. 2d 746 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Tootle v. Brown

    4 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

    (Winstead v. Standiford, 21 Kan. 270 ; Arn v. Hoerseman, 26 Kan. 415 ; Stout v. Townsend, 32 Kan. 424 ; Crane v. Choteau, 20 Kan. 288 ; Gibbs v. Gibbs, 18 Kan. 419 ; Knaggs v. Mastin, 9 Kan. 532 ; Bixley v. … Bailey, 11 Kan. 359 ; Ulrich v. Ulrich, 8 Kan. 402 ; St. L., K. C. & N. Ry. Co. v. Piper, 13 Kan. 505 ; Hobson v. Hobson, 16 Kan. 388 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    165 Vt. 79 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 22, 1996

    See People v. … In Burgett v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pentz

    1 Abb. Ct. App. 227 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1851

    Matts v. Hawkins, 5 Taunt. 20 ; Gibbons on Dilapidations, &c., 110. … Appleton, 1 Sumn. 492 ; Burke v. Nichols, p. 260 of this vol.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dustin v. Brown

    297 Ill. 499 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1921

    Cull having died, the appellee Margaret Helen Cull Brown, as his sole heir-at-law, stands in his place. … Stewart, 169 id. 374; Knight v. Pottgieser, supra; Bowler v. Bowler, 176 Ill. 541 ; Lynn v. Worthington, 266 id. 414; Brown v. Brown, 247 id. 528; People v. Camp; 286 id. 511; Henkins v. Henkins, 287 id. 62.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Wagnon v. Brown

    169 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

    In the case of City of Shawnee v. … In Aderhold v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    242 Conn. 389 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Aug 12, 1997

    State v. Brown, 239 Conn. 925 , 683 A.2d 21 (1996). … State v. Brown, supra, 40 Conn. App. 488 -90.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lewis

    76 Iowa 159 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 18, 1888

    determined whether the board had so acted or not. … Welch v. Board of Supervisors, 23 Iowa, 199 ; Smith v. Yoram, 37 Iowa, 89 ; Iowa News Co. v. Harris, 62 Iowa, 501 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    207 So. 3d 400 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 6, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Guerrier

    390 Mass. 631 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 20, 1983

    residential purposes” may file a petition against the owner to obtain relief from a “violation of the standards of fitness for human habitation established under the state sanitary code” and from a violation of certain local board … See Haas v. Breton, 377 Mass. 591 , 595 n.6 (1979); Commonwealth v. Haddad, 364 Mass. 795, 798-799 (1974).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    178 Mich. 155 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1913

    Brown, ten and 00/100 dollars, value received, and charge the same to “No. 2. L. Brown.” It is indorsed, “L. Brown.” … Brown; that it was about ten years since he had first heard him called Leo Brown; that he understood the respondent was signing his own name to the check; that he did not understand that he was signing the name of any other

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bates

    10 Ala. 432 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1846

    In LeRoy v. … In Sizer and others v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Garner v. Brown

    31 Wyo. 77 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1924

    Brown for the recovery of damages in the sum of $2945.90 alleged to have been caused to the person and property of plaintiff by the defendant Brown in negligently colliding with plaintiff’s car at the street intersection … The court in Paulson v. Klinge, 92 N. J.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    342 Pa. Super. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1985

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240 , 363 A.2d 1249 (1976). We held that Brown had effectively waived his right to trial by jury, and that his contentions on this point were frivolous. … Brown, 313 Pa.Super. 256 , 459 A.2d 837 (1983) (en banc); Commonwealth v. Cottman, 327 Pa.Super. 453 , 476 A.2d 40 (1984).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    321 S.C. 184 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 4, 1996

    We disagree. *187 In State v. … State v. Merriman, 287 S.C. 74 , 337 S.E. (2d) 218 (1985); State v. Sales, 285 S.C. 113 , 328 S.E. (2d) 619 (1985).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McAnally

    97 Wash. 2d 360 · Washington Supreme Court · May 13, 1982

    Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Dawson, supra at 504; State ex rel. Huntoon v. Superior Court, supra at 312. … Merriam v. Superior Court, supra at 66-67. See Spokane v. Spokane & Inland Empire R.R., supra at 658; see also King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn.2d 586, 595-96 , 369 P.2d 503 (1962); cf. Neitzel v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    79 Fla. 523 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 17, 1920

    Browne, C. J. The only question presented in this case is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. No useful purpose would be served to recite any of the evidence, or attempt to analyze it. … Howard v. State, 83 South. Rep. 87 . , The judgment is affirmed. Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Taber

    103 Iowa 1 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 7, 1897

    City of Waterloo v. Union Mill Co., 72 Iowa, 437; Incorporated Town of Cambridge v. Cook, 97 Iowa, 599 ; Manderschid v. City of Dubuque, 29 Iowa, *3 73 ; Bell v. City of Burlington, 68 Iowa, 296 ; Johnson v. … Jackson v. Hathaway, 8 Am. Dec. 263 ; Mendel v. Whiting, (Ill. Sup.) 31 N. E. Rep. 481; Harris v. Elliott, 10 Pet. 25 ; O’Linda v. Lothrop, 21 Pick. 296 ; Ammindown v. Bank, 8 Allen, 285 . III.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.