Case law

Shonk v. Brown

61 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1869

. & R. 466; Cochran v. O’Hern, 4 W. & S. 95 ; Heath v. Knapp, 4 Barr 228; Wright v. Brown, 8 Wright 238 . … This is the root of the error which has led to the attempt in this case to overturn the authority of Wright v. Brown and Wife, 8 Wright 224 .

State v. Brown

207 So. 3d 403 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 10, 2016

Castellow v. Brown

119 Ga. 461 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 12, 1904

Moore v. Guyton, 110 Ga. 330 , and cit. … Whitsett was young and inexperienced and had no one else to advise with him, the said V. A.

Dustin v. Brown

297 Ill. 499 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1921

Cull having died, the appellee Margaret Helen Cull Brown, as his sole heir-at-law, stands in his place. … Stewart, 169 id. 374; Knight v. Pottgieser, supra; Bowler v. Bowler, 176 Ill. 541 ; Lynn v. Worthington, 266 id. 414; Brown v. Brown, 247 id. 528; People v. Camp; 286 id. 511; Henkins v. Henkins, 287 id. 62.

Desmond v. Brown

33 Iowa 13 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 9, 1871

Kinyon v. Palmer, 18 Iowa, 377 , and Beardsly v. Bridgman, 17 id. 290. 2.-construction op words charged. II. … They are in accord with the holding of this court in Barton v. Holmes, 16 Iowa, 252 , and authorities there cited; McCaleb v. Smith, 22 id. 242.

Commonwealth v. Brown

124 Mass. 318 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 25, 1878

Commonwealth v. Powers, 116 Mass. 337 . Exceptions overruled.

State v. Brown

207 So. 3d 400 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 6, 2016

Brown v. Hawkins

139 Ga. 697 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 17, 1913

Brown and several others brought their equitable petition against .K. P. Hawkins ag tax-collector, N. H. Bullard as county school commissioner, and G-. C. … There is no authority of law for a board of education of a county to disregard these positive requirements of the statute. Lansdell v. King, 134 Ga. 536 ( 68 S. E. 102 ).

Brown v. Guerrier

390 Mass. 631 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 20, 1983

residential purposes” may file a petition against the owner to obtain relief from a “violation of the standards of fitness for human habitation established under the state sanitary code” and from a violation of certain local board … See Haas v. Breton, 377 Mass. 591 , 595 n.6 (1979); Commonwealth v. Haddad, 364 Mass. 795, 798-799 (1974).

Brown v. Braun

9 Ariz. 254 · Arizona Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1905

Quayle v. Glenn (Idaho), 57 Pac. 308 . The sum claimed in the justice court in this case clearly exceeded three hundred dollars, and was therefore not a matter in controversy in which the justice court had jurisdiction.

State v. Brown

266 Kan. 563 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 22, 1999

The State first argues that Brown’s motion for change of judge was not timely because of K.S.A. 20-311f. State v. … See State v. Rice, 261 Kan. 567, 602 , 932 P.2d 981 (1997). In Chamberlain v.

People v. Brown

178 Mich. 155 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1913

Brown, ten and 00/100 dollars, value received, and charge the same to “No. 2. L. Brown.” It is indorsed, “L. Brown.” … Brown; that it was about ten years since he had first heard him called Leo Brown; that he understood the respondent was signing his own name to the check; that he did not understand that he was signing the name of any other

Brown v. Bates

10 Ala. 432 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1846

In LeRoy v. … In Sizer and others v.

Carll v. Brown

2 Mich. 401 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1852

1848, and that prior to the twentieth day of June following, Carll, the plaintiff, became the owner of the note, and it is not insisted that he had at the time of the purchase any knowledge of the equities between Bean and Brown

Commonwealth v. Brown

342 Pa. Super. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1985

Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240 , 363 A.2d 1249 (1976). We held that Brown had effectively waived his right to trial by jury, and that his contentions on this point were frivolous. … Brown, 313 Pa.Super. 256 , 459 A.2d 837 (1983) (en banc); Commonwealth v. Cottman, 327 Pa.Super. 453 , 476 A.2d 40 (1984).

State v. Brown

245 Kan. 604 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Dec 8, 1989

State v. Berry, 223 Kan. 102 , Syl. ¶ 2, 573 P.2d 584 (1977). See State v. Loveland, 8 Kan. App. 2d 196, 199 , 653 P.2d 472 (1982), rev. denied 232 Kan. 876 (1983); State v. Sabater, 3 Kan. … State v. Dunn, 243 Kan. 414, 429 , 758 P.2d 718 (1988). There was sufficient evidence to establish that Brown intended to possess the cocaine found in his pocket.

Murphey v. Brown

12 Ariz. 268 · Arizona Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1909

Garner v. Cutting, 32 Iowa, 547 ; Andrews v. Porter, 112 Ala. 381 , 20 South. 475 ; Sevier v. Shaw, 25 Ark. 417 . … Co. v. Lee, 4 S. D. 495, 57 N. W. 238 ; Sorrells v. Goldberg, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 265 , 78 S. W. 711 ; Bless v. Jenkins, 129 Mo. 647 , 31 S. W. 938 .

Brown v. McAnally

97 Wash. 2d 360 · Washington Supreme Court · May 13, 1982

Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Dawson, supra at 504; State ex rel. Huntoon v. Superior Court, supra at 312. … Merriam v. Superior Court, supra at 66-67. See Spokane v. Spokane & Inland Empire R.R., supra at 658; see also King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn.2d 586, 595-96 , 369 P.2d 503 (1962); cf. Neitzel v.

Goodrich v. Brown

63 Iowa 247 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 10, 1884

At the time of the execution of the mortgage, lot 8 and the east half of lot 7, adjacent thereto, were occupied by the mortgagor, the defendant, Jeremiah Brown, and his wife, the defendant, Mary Brown, as their homestead. … White v. Rowley, 46 Iowa, 680 .

Commonwealth v. Brown

413 Mass. 693 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 12, 1992

Commonwealth v. McLaughlin, supra at 223 , quoting Rocco v. Boston-Leader, Inc., supra. See Commonwealth v. Fuller, 399 Mass. 678, 682 (1987). … Commonwealth v. Fuller, supra at 682-683 & n.8. The defendant argues, citing Commonwealth v.