Case law

Brown v. State

207 So. 3d 1241 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2016

Fitzgerald v. Brown

259 Mont. 468 · Montana Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1993

Eva Marie Brown appeals from two orders of the District Court for the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County. … Furthermore, both parties were given additional time for briefing following the hearing and no prejudice to Eva has been demonstrated from the shortness of notice. *478 V Did the District Court err when it denied Eva’s request

Maddox v. Brown

232 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1950

The evidence cannot be said to be without reasonable inferences in support of the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant Brown was negligent, and that bis negligence was the proximate cause of the injury and death … White v. R. R., 121 N.C. 484 , 27 S.E. 1002 ; State v. Shule, 32 N.C. 153 .” But in Neal v. R.

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas · Jun 6, 2025

See Brown, 300 Kan. at 567, 590 (citing State v. Ivory, 273 Kan. 44, 41 P.3d 781 [2002]). … State v.

Hargrove v. Brown

247 La. 689 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 29, 1965

174 So.2d 120 (1965) 247 La. 689 Margie HARGROVE v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, et al. No. 47467. Supreme Court of Louisiana. … See Turner v. Brown, Administrator (La.App.), 155 So.2d 276 .

Baldwin v. Brown

48 Wash. 303 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1908

Brown, his heirs and assigns, as hereinafter stated, the said J. W. … Brown reserves the right and title to said land until the same is paid for in full.”

Brown v. State

513 S.W.2d 35 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 24, 1974

Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972); Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 506 S.W.2d 212 ; Winn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 503 S.W.2d 816 . … Martinez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 437 S.W. 2d 842 ; Winn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 503 S.W.2d 816 ; Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 506 S.W.2d 212 .

Hansen v. Brown

123 N.J.L. 223 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939

We need not decide whether this was erroneous, as the evidence on other phases of the case supports the verdict; but it may be well to note that an unusual construction may be classed as negligent, as in Leech v. … L. 366; 115 Id. 114, where each tread of a stairway had a “pocket” at the end; and in Crouse v. Stacy-Trent Co., 110 Id. 124, where there was an unexpected step with no warning and inadequate lighting.

Brown v. Thomas

257 Ga. 68 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 15, 1987

Hardeman v. State, 252 Ga. 286 ( 313 SE2d 95 ) (1984). 2. … See Young v. State, 255 Ga. 143 ( 335 SE2d 864 ) (1985); Simmons v. State, 111 Ga. App. 553 ( 142 SE2d 308 ) (1965).

State v. Brown

172 Conn. 531 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 15, 1977

State v. Ralls, 167 Conn. 408 , 415 n.2, 356 A.2d 147 ; State v. Dubina, 164 Conn. 95, 101 , 318 A.2d 95 ; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 212. … Ed. 2d 607 , Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30 , 90 S. Ct. 1564 , 26 L. Ed. 2d 26 , and Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 101 . In Smith v.

Brown v. State

231 Ark. 363 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1959

In Hamm v. State, 214 Ark. 171 , 214 S. … In Tignor v. State, 76 Ark. 489 , 89 S.

Brown v. Bangs

306 Mass. 551 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 10, 1940

Walker v. Benz Kid Co. 279 Mass. 533, 537 , and cases cited. Atlas v. Silsbury-Gamble Motors Co. 278 Mass. 279, 282-283 . Morris v. Weene, 258 Mass. 178 . Sponatski’s Case, 220 Mass. 526 . … Bigwood v. Boston & Northern Street Railway, 209 Mass. 345, 349 . Exceptions overruled.

Newton v. Brown

2 Utah 126 · Utah Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1880

Weddel v. Stark, 10 Cal. 302 ; Brady v. O’Brian, 23 Cal. 243 . There was no abuse of discretion in this case, and for this reason alone the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

Brown v. Morris

20 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1839

Young v. … Simpson v. Blount, 3 Dev. 34. Torrence v. Graham, 1 Dev. & Bat. 284 . The judgment is affirmed with costs. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. Hutcheson

166 Ga. 644 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 18, 1928

Brown filed in this court a petition seeking a writ of mandamus against John B. Hutcheson, Judge of the Stone Mountain Circuit, to require him to certify a bill of exceptions.

Brown v. Hubbard

42 Wash. 2d 867 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1953

Skoog v. Seymour, 29 Wn. (2d) 355, 187 P. (2d) 304 (1947). This court said in Young v. … Suksdorf v. Humphrey, 36 Wash. 1 , 77 Pac. 1071 ; McCormick v. Sorenson, 58 Wash. 107 , 107 Pac. 1055 ; Snell v. Stelling, 83 Wash. 248 , 145 Pac. 466 ; Lindberg v. Davis, 164 Wash. 680 , 4 P. (2d) 501 ; Beck v.

Stewart v. Brown

48 Mich. 383 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1882

Stephens Ev. art. 9; 1 Starkie Ev. 88-92; Deitsch v. Wiggins 15 Wall. 539 ; Crocker v. Lewis 3 Sumn. 1 . The objection that the tender was not good because the amount was less than the sum prima faoie due is fallacious. … Fuller v. Parrish 3 Mich. 211; Moynahan v. Moore 9 Mich. 1 ; Caruthers v. Humphrey 12 Mich. 270 ; Van Husan v. Kanouse 13 Mich. 303 ; Eslow v. Mitchell 26 Mich. 500 ; Sager v. Tupper 35 Mich. 134 ; Johnson v.

Brown v. Martin

162 Ga. 172 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 16, 1926

L. 1919, p. 66), which authorizes the county authorities to levy a tax on the recommendation of the board of education, within the limits there specified, that is, not less than one nor more than five mills on the dollar … of education to maintain the suit and to compel by mandamus the board of county commissioners to levy the tax under the resolution which they had passed.

Fish v. Brown

5 Watts 441 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1836

~In Shaeffer v. … Another witness (Barr) testified that he knew the line between the claims of Brown and Campbell; that it ran through the five acre field, splitting it .nearly in the middle.

Sutton v. Brown

85 Idaho 104 · Idaho Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1962

Miller v. Miller, 74 App.D.C. 216 , 122 F.2d 209 ; Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co., D.C., 44 F.Supp. 523 ; Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 . … Mabe v. State, 83 Idaho 222 , 360 P.2d 799 ; Carr v. City of Anchorage, 17 Alaska 116 , 243 F.2d 482 ; 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice & Procedure, 138, § 1235.