Case law

Brown v. Borland

230 Neb. 391 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1988

When the conveyance was made, the Browns had a claim against James Borland and were, therefore, creditors of James at that time. See, Jahner v. Jacob, 252 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 1977); Churchill v Palmer, 57 Mich. … Because the transfer of the Borland home was between spouses, at trial the Browns, as creditors, were entitled to a presumption that the conveyance was fraudulent. See Gifford-Hill & Co. v. Stoller, supra.

Gage v. Brown

125 Ill. 522 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1888

Ditch v. Sennott, 116 Ill. 288 ; Benneson v. Savage, 119 id. 135. For the error indicated, the decree will be reversed and the cause remanded. Decree reversed.

State v. Brown

208 So. 3d 375 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 19, 2016

Collier v. Brown

285 Ala. 40 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1969

Mudd v. Lanier, 247 Ala. 363 , 24 So.2d 550 (1945). … Joseph v. Hopkins, 276 Ala. 18 , 158 So.2d 660 (1963).

Brown v. Master

104 Ala. 451 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

Margaret Master is plaintiff and Annie brown is defendant in this action. The complaint contains two counts. … Ency. of Law, p. 36, note 6 ; McKellar v. Couch, 34 Ala. 336 ; Benson & Co. v. McCoy, 36 Ala. 710 ; Tucker v. Adams, 52 Ala. 254, 256; Lunsford v. Dietrich, 93 Ala. 565 , and authorities there cited.

Champ v. Brown

197 Minn. 49 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Mar 27, 1936

And as far back as Lovell v. … Elston v. Jasper, 45 Tex. 409 .

Brown v. State

170 A.3d 148 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 17, 2017

State v. Brown

128 N.H. 606 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Oct 3, 1986

See Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 611 (1965); State v. Cormier, 127 N.H. 253, 255 , 499 A.2d 986, 988 (1985); State v. Arsenault, 115 N.H. 109, 112 , 336 A.2d 244, 246 (1975). … C “Now, again, in order for the State to sustain its burden, it’s required to prove that Russell Brown purposely shot James Barrett and he did so with the purpose that the crime of murder be committed.

State v. Brown

151 Minn. 340 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Feb 10, 1922

This allegation was held not indispensable in State v. Hosmer, 144 Minn. 342 , 175 N. W. 683 . … If he was such manager we are of the opinion that he might be liable criminally for sales made by the sales agents of the company. 23 Cyc. 257; State v. Mahoney, 23 Minn. 181 ; State v. Mueller, 38 Minn. 497 , 38 N.

Brown v. Pierce

97 Mass. 46 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1867

This principle was recognized and adopted by this court on full consideration in Lanfear v. Sumner, 17 Mass. 110 , and has been often affirmed by subsequent decisions. … Thayer v. Turner, 8 Met. 550 . Chit. Con. (10th Am. ed.) 815.

Wacha v. Brown

78 Iowa 432 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 12, 1889

Defendant Margaret Brown, the widow of John Brown, testified on both trials. … That being true, the case falls within the rule announced in Grube v. Wells, 34 Iowa, 148 . See, also, State v. Welpton, 34 Iowa, 145 ; Skinner v. Crawford, 54 Iowa, 119 ; Donahue v. Lannan, 70 Iowa, 73 ; Weinig v.

Brown v. State

211 Ind. 61 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1937

School Town of Andrews v. Heiney (1912), 178 Ind. 1, 8 , 98 N. E. 628 . We adhere to this statement of the law. … In the case of Morris et al. v. City of Indianapolis et al. (1912), 177 Ind. 369, 385 , 94 N.

Wilson v. Brown

221 Ga. 273 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 9, 1965

Bank v. Lawrence, 212 Ala. 45 (101 S 663); Wisner v. Wisner, 82 W. Va. 9 ( 95 SE 802 ); Illinois Trust & Sav. Bank v. Van Vlack, 310 Ill. 185 ( 141 NE 546 ); Taylor v. Smith, 116 N.C. 531 ( 21 SE 202 ); Malone v. … See Knight v. Wingate, supra. 3.

Brown v. State

373 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 2008

Appellant, Richard Brown, by and through his attorney, David O. Bowden, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension, Brown’s brief was due on April 23, 2008. … Wertz v. State, 373 Ark. 260 , 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (citing Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242 , 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995)). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id. (citing Strom v.

Brown v. Baer

79 Ga. 347 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 6, 1888

When the “Hochstadter goods” were put up, Baer told Brown it would be better for him (Baer) to bid them off, but that Brown should take them at his bid. … indebtedness of Brown to Baer, thus created, had been paid.

Brown v. Smedley

136 Mich. 65 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1904

In the case of Kulenkamp v. … Bank v. Seymour, 64 Mich. 59 ( 31 N. W. 140 ); Farwell v. Ensign, 66 Mich. 600 ( 33 N. W. 734 ); Shaw v. Stein, 79 Mich. 77 ( 44 N. W. 419 ); Macomb v. Wilkinson, 83 Mich. 486 ( 47 N. W. 336 ); Keidan v.

Brown v. Bonds

125 Ga. 833 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 18, 1906

Brown, surrendered up and canceled. Bell v. Weyman, 99 Ga. 273 . … Walden v. Walden, 124 Ga. 145 .

State v. Brown

296 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1984

We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v. … See, State v. Turner, 296 Or 451 , 676 P2d 873 (1984). We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Noyes v. Brown

33 Vt. 431 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Nov 15, 1860

It appears that “ on the 5th day of January, 1857, Brown assigned, made over and conveyed to Gleed, verbally and not in writing, the said monies so in the hands of said V. P. … The transaction, when turned into words, was in substance the saying by Brown to Gleed, “ I assign, make over and convey to you the said monies in the hands of V. P.

Brown v. State

262 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 1977

Ball v. State, 48 Ark. 94 , 2 S.W. 462 (1886); Hudley v. State, 36 Ark. 237 (1880). … Brown testified that he was in Memphis at the time of the robbery. His sister was called to testify that Brown telephoned her that evening and said that he was in Memphis.