Case law

State v. Brown

178 Wash. 588 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1934

In the case of State v. … This rule is supported by the following- authorities: Wilson v. Haley Live Stock Co., 153 U. S. 39 , 14 8. Ct. 768; Leyer v. United States, 183 Fed. 102 ; Pistillo v. United States, 26 Fed. (2d) 202; Briggs v.

Brown v. Denson

895 So. 2d 882 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 2004

Clair Board of Education. Curtis Brown sold Denson the disability policy. He signed Denson's enrollment form *884 next to the words "Signature of Agent." … Int'l v.

Brown v. Cody

115 Ind. 484 · Indiana Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1888

The case of Hasselman v. … Co. v. Allen, 113 Ind. 308 ; Indiana, etc., R. W. Co. v. Allen, 113 Ind. 581 ; Ragsdale v. Mitchell, 97 Ind. 458 ; Farrar v. Clark, 97 Ind. 447; Green v. Glynn, 71 Ind. 336 .

Baldwin v. Brown

193 Cal. 345 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1924

(Kerr v. Hitt, 75 Ill. 51 ; Kellogg v. Carrico, 47 Mo. 157 ; Benkendorf v. Yincens, 52 Mo. 441 ; Turney v. Blomstrom, 62 Neb. 616 [ 87 N. W. 339 ]; Lynch v. Durfee, 101 Mich. 171 [ 45 Am. St. Rep. 404 , 24 L. R. … They are chiefly Odell v. Cox, 151 Cal. 70 [ 90 Pac. 194 ]; Winbigler v. Sherman, 175 Cal. 270 [ 165 Pac. 943 ] ; Bauer v. Hertweck, 175 Cal. 278 [ 165 Pac. 946 ]; and Bock v. Losekamp, 179 Cal. 674 [ 179 Pac. 516 ].

Brown v. Kenyon

108 Ind. 283 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1886

The defence set up in the answer is, that subsequent to the execution of the notes, it was agreed between Brown, the payee, now deceased, and appellee, that he should board and furnish a home for Brown during his natural … Bristor v. Bristor, 82 Ind. 276 . There is an exception to that general rule, which is stated in the case of McConnell v.

Brown v. State

108 Ala. 18 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1895

.— Hall v. State, 53 Ala. 463 ; Lawson v. State, 20 Ala. 65 ; Collins v. State, 14 Ala. 608 ; State v. Glaze, 9 Ala. 283 . … In Lawson v.

Taylor v. Brown

49 Or. 423 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1907

Rep. 836 ); Casto v. Murray, 47 Or. 57 ( 81 Pac. 883 ). … Wong Fook, 13 Or. 577 ( 11 Pac. 277 ); Lewis v. Birdsey, 19 Or. 164 ( 26 Pac. 623 ); Fisher v. Kelly, *426 30 Or. 1 ( 46 Pac. 146 ).

Rivers v. Brown

200 Ga. 49 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 16, 1945

McLaren v. Steapp, 1 Ga. 376 ; Hazlehurst v. Savannah, Griffin & North Alabama Railroad Co., 43 Ga. 13 ; Lowe v. Burke, 79 Ga. 164 ( 3 S. E. 449 ); Tietjen v. Meldrim, 169 Ga. 678 (1) ( 151 S. E. 349 ); Calbeck v. … Sanderlin v. Sanderlin, 27 Ga. 334 . See also Thornton v. Lane, 11 Ga. 459 ; Norton v. Paragon Oil Can Co., 105 Ga. 466 ( 30 S. E. 437 ); Allen v. Schweigert, 113 Ga. 69 ( 38 S. E. 397 ); Burke v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

246 Va. 460 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Nov 5, 1993

Hewitt v. Commonwealth, 226 Va. 621, 623 , 311 S.E.2d 112, 114 (1984); Whittaker v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 966, 968 , 234 S.E.2d 79, 81 (1977); Davis v. … Our review of the record, particularly the testimony referenced above, reveals that Brown tried to make a proffer, but the trial court did not permit him to do so. In Owens v.

Brown v. State

130 Tex. Crim. 323 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1936

Whiteside v. State, 29 S. W. (2d) 399 . A judgment denying an application will not be disturbed on appeal unless it be made to appear that the trial judge abusedf his discretion. Whiteside v. State, supra. … In his voluntary statement appellant admitted his presence at the scene of the homicide but stated that his brother, Coupie Brown, killed deceased.

State v. Brown

203 Kan. 884 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jul 17, 1969

Ayres, who was also charged with and convicted of the same burglary in the companion case of State v. Ayres, 203 Kan. 376 , 454 P. 2d 534 . Blood appeared to be on the floor boards of the car. … (State v. Cassady, 12 Kan. 550 ; State v. White, 76 Kan. 654 , 92 Pac. 829 ; State v. Rice, 93 Kan. 589 , 144 Pac. 1016 ; State v. Grey, 154 Kan. 442 , 119 P. 2d 468 ; State v.

Brown v. State

450 Md. 660 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 2, 2016

State v. Brown

263 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

S. v. Rich, 231 N.C. 696 , 58 S.E. 2d 717 ; S. v. Thompson, 226 N.C. 651 , 39 S.E. 2d 823 ; S. v. Jordan, supra. In S. v. … In S. v.

Ingalls v. Brown

460 A.2d 1379 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1983

In Englebrecht v. … Bowman v. Dussault, 425 A.2d 1325, 1328 (Me.1981). See Barrett v. Stewart, 456 A.2d 10, 11 (Me.1983).

Brown v. Greer

16 Ariz. 222 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1914

Christ v. Flannagan, 23 Colo. 140 , 46 Pac. 683 ; State v. District Court of Pine County, 88 Minn. 95 , 92 N. W. 518 . … The record discloses that on December 28,1912, Judge SAPP wrote counsel for defendant and appellant as follows: “This is to advise that cases 347 and 348, Greer v. Brown, have been set for hearing January 11, 1913.”

Brown v. State

109 P.3d 52 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2005

Solis v. State, 981 P.2d 28, 31 (Wyo.1999), Beintema v. State, 936 P.2d 1221, 1224 (Wyo.1997). … Jandro v.

Brown v. State

829 So. 2d 93 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2002

The check was drawn on a Tupelo Foam Sales, Incorporated account, was payable to V. Edwin Brown, and was for the sum of $252.45. … York v. State, 413 So.2d 1372, 1383 (Miss.1982). In Thompson v.

Smith v. Brown

44 W. Va. 342 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1898

Riddle v. McGinnis, 22 W. Va., 253, 275 ; Seborn v. Beckwith, 30 W. Va., 774 , ( 5 S. E. 450 ). … In Forrer v.

Brown v. . Hobbs

147 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1908

In Trowbridge v. … See, also, Stone v. Dennison, 13 Pick., 1 , and. Page v. Monks, 5 Gray, 492 . The same state of facts appeared in Miller v.

Brown v. Harmon

76 Neb. 28 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1906

Brown, Matilda E. Harmon and Lucinda Kemble, daughters, A. L. Scott, a son, and W. L. Scott, a grandson. A. L. Scott was a resident of Thayer county. Sarah M.. Brown, Lucinda Kemble and A. L. … The case of Sheedy v. Sheedy, 36 Neb. 373 , which it is urged supports the demand of the plaintiffs in error for a jury, iu our judgment is not in point.