Case law

Ziegler v. Brown

112 Fla. 421 · Supreme Court of Florida · Oct 19, 1933

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Hampton, 70 Fla. 231 , 70 So. 385 ; Madden v. Madden, 169 Ky. 367 , 183 S. W. 931 ; 1916E L. R. A. (N. S.) 892; McKain v. Mullen, 65 W. Va. 558 , 64 S. E. 829 ; Elliott v. … J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Owen v. Brown

13 La. Ann. 201 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1858

Under the authority of the case of Hoover v. Miller, 6 An. 205, it appears to us that the -objection to the answer is well taken. … How did you retain your right against the defendant Brown ? Were these reservations expressly made in the release which you executed, if in writing ? If the affair were merely oral, what did you agree upon ?

State v. Brown

Hawaii Supreme Court · Sep 30, 2025

State v. … In State v.

State v. Brown

675 A.2d 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1996

State v. Cusack, 649 A.2d 16, 18 (Me.1994). … State v. Powell, 591 A.2d 1306, 1308 (Me.1991).

Brown v. Hill

216 Mich. 520 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1921

over of the duties of said board of county auditors by the board of supervisors of the county of Kent. … See collection of authorities in People v. Quider, 172 Mich. 280, 289 ; North Michigan Water Co. v. City of Escanaba, 199 Mich. 286 .

Brown v. Gerhardt

5 Ill. 2d 106 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1955

(Western Theological Seminary v. City of Evanston, 325 Ill. 511 ; Douglas v. Village of Melrose Park, 389 Ill. 98 .) … (Douglas v. Village of Melrose Park, 389 Ill. 98 .)

McKinney v. Brown

130 Pa. 365 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1889

Jennie Brown. The judgment entered was recovered before a justice of the peace against Robert P. Brown and Jennie Brown, and a transcript thereof was filed in the Common Pleas for the purpose of lien only. … The judgment is still in force before the justice, and any attack upon it must be made there: Dailey v. Gifford, 12 S. & R. 72; O’Donnel v. Seybert, 13 S. & R. 54; Lacock v. White, 19 Pa. 495 ; Boyd v.

Brown v. Hadwin

182 Mich. 491 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1914

Pro. §§ 716-719; Commonwealth v. Lottery Tickets, 5 Cush. [Mass.] 369; Brown v. Kelley, 20 Mich. 27 ; People v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 36 Mich. 334 ; Swart v. Kimball, 43 Mich. 451 [ 5 N. W. 635 ]. … Badger v. Reade, 39 Mich. 774 ; People v. Recorder of Albany, 6 Hill [N. Y.], 429; Proctor v. Prout, 17 Mich. 473 .”

Brown v. State

250 Ala. 444 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 15, 1948

MacMahon v. Dozier, 237 Ala. 574 , 187 So. 710 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Dennis, 212 Ala. 590 , 103 So. 894 ; Sharp v. Edwards, 203 Ala. 205 (6 and 7), 82 So. 455 ; Dorsey v. … Kinney v. White, 215 Ala. 247 , 110 So. 394 ; Gibson v. Edwards, 245 Ala. 334 , 16 So.2d 865 ; Ex parte Hood, 107 Ala. 520 , 18 So. 176 ; Anders v. Latimer, 198 Ala. 573 , 73 So. 925 ; Bell v.

Tucker v. Brown

9 Wash. 357 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1894

These statements were relied upon to take the cases out of the rule announced by this court in Balch v. Smith, 4 Wash. 497 ( 30 Pac. 648 ), and Hill v.

Brown v. Keach

24 Conn. 73 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 15, 1855

In the case of Wilcox v. … Bucket v. Church, 9 C. & P., 209. 38 E. C. L. R., 83. The more correct rule is laid down in a still later case. Clark v. Sigourney, 17 Conn. R., 517.

Brown v. State

64 Wis. 2d 581 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1974

Brown’s former attorney was called as a witness and without objection stated that on prior occasions he had given Brown his business card. … Ed. 2d 1448 ; the general conditions under which the interrogation took *588 place, Fay v. Noia (1963), 372 U. S. 391 , 83 Sup. Ct. 822, 9 L. Ed. 2d 837 ; any extreme psychological or physical pressure, Brown v.

State v. Brown

296 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

Brown, 296 Or 461 , 676 P2d 877 (1984). … We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v.

Huber v. Brown

243 Ill. 274 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1909

(Brown v. … (Brown v. Schintz, 203 Ill. 136 .)

State v. Brown

184 So. 3d 1265 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 19, 2016

Indeed, in Strickler v. … Brown.

Brown v. Cascaden

43 Iowa 103 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 20, 1876

Banta v. Wood, 32 Iowa, 469 ; Knetzer v. Bradstreet, 1 G. Greene, 382; 4 Kent’s Com., 183. Chancellor Kent, in Dunkley v. Van Bwren et al., 3 Johns. … Bsnta v. Wood, supra.

Brown v. Lipscomb

9 Port. 472 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1839

The validity of the mortgage from Brown to Pis-tole, was not disputed on the ground of usury in the Circuit court; but the argument is, that it is a harsh and un-conscientious contract, which neither equity nor law will enforce

Brown v. State

117 Ariz. 476 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1978

In Hogan v. … Finney v. Arkansas Board of Corrections, 505 F.2d 194 (8th Cir., 1974) . The state must also apply statutory privileges in the same manner to all who qualify for such privileges.

Brown v. Jurczak

397 Ill. 532 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1947

Espadron v. Davis, 385 Ill. 304 ; Herrick v. Lain, 375 Ill. 569 . … (Macy v. Brown, 326 Ill. 556 .)

Brown v. State

456 Md. 85 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 20, 2017