Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.84s
244 Va. 528 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Nov 6, 1992
See Habers v. Madigan, 213 Va. 485, 487 , 193 S.E.2d 653, 655 (1973). See also Mary Washington Hosp. v. Gibson, 228 Va. 95, 99 , 319 S.E.2d 741, 743 (1984); Saunders v. … See Grasty v. Tanner, 206 Va. 723, 726-27 , 146 S.E.2d 252, 254-55 (1966); Venable v. Stockner, 200 Va. 900, 904-05 , 108 S.E.2d 380, 383-84 (1959).
Cited 38 timesPublished295 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1929
In Fortesque v. Carroll, 76 N. J. Eq. 583, Mr. … In Howland v. Andrus, 81 N. J.
Cited 10 timesPublished54 Me. 468 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867
Fletcher v. Dyche, 2 T. R., 32; Astley v. Weldon, 2 Bos. & Pul., 346; Kemble v. Farren, 2 Bing., 141; Lynde & al. v. Thompson, 2 Allen, 456 ; Bagly v. Peddie, 16 N. Y., 469 . 2. … Orr v. Churchill, 1 H. Bl., 227; Astley v. Weldon, ante; Mead v. Wheeler, 13 N. H., 351; Atkyns v. Kinnier, 4 Exch., 776.
Cited 14 timesPublished76 N.C. 222 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877
Luther v. Skeen, 8 Jones, 356 ; State v. Oscar, 7 Jones, *226 305. … State v. Johnson, 1 Winst., 238; State v. Smith, 2 Ire. 402.
Cited 5 timesPublished73 Ariz. 116 · Arizona Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1951
No. 1 v. Southwest Cotton Co., 39 Ariz. 65 , 4 P.2d 369 ; Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Sakrison, 71 Ariz. 219 , 225 P.2d 707 ; Industrial Commission of Arizona v. J. & J. Const. … Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. Du Vuall, 57 Ariz. 199 , 122 P.2d 589 ; Southwest Cotton Co. v. Pope, 25 Ariz. 364 , 218 P. 152 ; Napier v.
Cited 38 timesPublished14 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1850
But finally, Kerper v. Hoch, 1 Watts 9 , followed by Hemphill v. Carpenter, 6 Watts 22 ; and Bailey v. Bowman, 6 W. … In Jack v. James, 5 Whar. 321 , it was ruled on the authority of Fryhoffer v.
Cited 10 timesPublished32 Mo. 176 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1862
, against Anthony Tiernan, in and by which Brown recovered and received the possession of the-same premises, which suit was commenced in September, 1857. … If the plaintiff in this case claims under Anthony Tier-nan, and if the action brought by the defendant, John Brown, against Anthony Tiernan and others (the record of which is in evidence in this case) was brought for the
Cited 8 timesPublished607 P.2d 261 · Utah Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1980
In State v. … Brown encountered Lou Ann Ross. Mr. Brown stated to her, T just headshot two f_for messing with my brother.’ ” Upon cross-examination of Mr. Watson by defense counsel the following exchange occurred: Q.
Cited 38 timesPublished136 Vt. 409 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Sep 11, 1978
Brown v. Tatro, 134 Vt. 248 , 356 A.2d 512 (1976). … See Rivers v. State of Vermont, 133 Vt. 11 , 328 A.2d 398 (1974).
Cited 12 timesPublished228 S.C. 472 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Dec 15, 1955
See also, Sullivan v. City of Anderson, 81 S. C. 478, 62 S. E. 862 , It was held in League v. National Surety Corp., 198 S. C. 289, 17 S. … As was said in Du Bose v. Bultman, 215 S. C. 468, 56 S.
Cited 20 timesPublished150 Mont. 498 · Montana Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1968
Brown, who contracted to purchase the ranch. … (See Nyder v. Champlin, 401 Ill. 317 , 81 N.E.2d 923 , 5 A.L.R.2d 282 ; Neidhardt v. Frank, 325 Ill. 596 , 156 N.E. 769 ; State, etc., v. Bonnett, 114 Utah 546 , 201 P.2d 939 .)
Cited 9 timesPublished594 S.W.2d 86 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 23, 1980
See also United States v. Wright, 577 F.2d 378 , 381 n. 2 (6th Cir. 1978) (dictum). But see United States v. … Kemner v. State, 589 S.W.2d 403 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). Accord, e. g., United States v. Calandrella, 605 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1979); United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished27 Ga. 102 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 15, 1859
This was a libel for divorce, brought by Brown, as guardian of Westbrook, against Catherine, his wife, on the ground of mental incapacity at the time of the marriage.
Cited 10 timesPublished52 Me. 578 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864
Brown, then, having never parted with his title, is entitled to recover the full value of his property. It is as much his as any property he may own. … Buckmaster v. Smith, 22 Vt., 203 . The plaintiff is entitled to recover the full value. Smith v. Foster, 18 Vt., 182 .
Cited 10 timesPublished142 Me. 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 1946
In our first opinion, State v. … State v. Farmer, 84 Me., 436, 24 A., 985 ; Plourd v. Jarvis, 99 Me., 161, *115 58 A., 774 ; O’Brien v. J. G. White & Co., 105 Me., 308, 74 A., 721 ; Johnson v.
Cited 10 timesPublished80 Kan. 44 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Apr 10, 1909
(Tucker v. Grace, 61 Ark. 410 ; Briggs v. Breen, 123 Cal. 657 ; Sullivan v. Lusk, 7 Cal. App. 186 ; Lusk v. Patterson, 2 Colo. App. 306 ; Barker v. Kunkel, 10 Ill. App. 407 ; Wait v. Holt, 58 N. H. 467; Garnett v. … (Keniston v. Little, 30 N. H. 318; Merritt v. Seaman, 6 N. Y. 318 ; L. H. and J. P. Rich, Exrs. v. Albert Sowles, Admr., 64 Vt. 408 ; Fitzhugh’s ex’or v. G. F. Fitzhugh, 11 Grat. [Va.] 300; Bennett v. Whitney, 94 N.
Cited 17 timesPublished170 A.3d 1052 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna