Case law

Brown v. State

200 A.3d 228 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Dec 17, 2018

Commonwealth v. Brown

170 A.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2017

Brown v. Beck

64 Ariz. 299 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1946

Beebe v. Farish, 14 Ariz. 231 , 127 P. 715 ; Dowdy v. Calvi, 14 Ariz. 148 , 125 P. 873 . … In our case of Webb v.

Brown v. Jones

5 Nev. 374 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1870

Brown v. State

492 S.W.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1973

Burnside v. State, 473 S.W.2d 697 [1] (Mo. 1971). … Coleman v. State, 473 S.W.2d 692, 695 [3] (Mo.1971); Gaitan v. State, 464 S.W.2d 33, 36 [5-9] (Mo.1971).

Thompson v. Brown

121 Ga. 814 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 28, 1905

Benjamin v. Benjamin, 15 Conn. 347 , 39 Am. Dec. 384 . 2. … Law (2d ed.) 1188; Blount v. Dugger, 115 Ga. 109 . Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he excepted.

Brown v. Troup

33 Miss. 35 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1857

Brown, from proceeding to sell certain property under a deed of trust executed by the complainant, to secure the payment of a debt by him owing to one John Ezell, on the ground that Brown was indebted in a large sum to one … The bill alleges that the balance due upon the note held by Brown was about $1300, and that the complainant had recovered a judgment against William Ezell, to whom Brown was alleged to be indebted several thousand dollars

Brown v. Commonwealth

222 Va. 111 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 12, 1981

United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979). Accord, United States v. Michel, 588 F.2d 986, 1001 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825 (1979); United States v. … Cir. 1975); United States v. Rosenthal, 454 F.2d 1252 , 1255 n. 2 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 931 (1972).

Brown v. Brown

89 W. Va. 339 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1921

Brown, under the provisions of the will, received a tract of land containing several hundred acres. The plaintiff C. L. Brown was assigned a like tract of land adjoining that of E. W. Brown, and the other brother, W-. … Hall v. The Bank of Virginia, 14 W. Va. 584 ; 3 C. J. 656. E. W. Brown has just as much interest in the subject matter here as tbe trustee in such a deed of trust.

Brown v. Maher

68 Ind. 14 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1879

Brown, the plaintiff', appears to have owned the land before the sale thereof, hereinafter mentioned. … See the ease of Hatfield v. Jackson, 50 Ind. 507 , and authorities there cited. The appellant claims that the defendant could not avail himself of the statute of limitations, inasmuch as it was not pleaded.

Gurley v. Brown

65 Nev. 245 · Nevada Supreme Court · May 21, 1948

of councilmen and the individual members could act only as such board. *255 In Coldwater v. … In a number of later Tennessee cases the full import of Hale v. Johnston was not followed. In Johnson City Board of Education v.

Brown v. Blunt

72 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 1881

See Nowlan v. Cain, 3 Allen, 261 . … Hence it is held in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

401 Mass. 745 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 2, 1988

See Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 677-678 (1979), citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979). … See Commonwealth v. Almeida, 381 Mass. 420, 422 (1980); Commonwealth v. Bennefield, 373 Mass. 452, 453 (1977).

Baker v. Brown

83 Miss. 793 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1903

Rand, 63 Cab, 468; Warwick v. Warwick, 86 Va., 602 . … The supreme court of Louisiana,, in the case of McMichael v. Bankston, 24 La.

Hough v. Brown

104 Mich. 109 · Michigan Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1895

Miller v. Havens, 51 Mich. 482 . In Walsh v. … In Koeleg v.

Campbell v. Brown

81 Kan. 480 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 8, 1910

(The State v. Pomeroy, 25 Kan. 349 ; Tennis v. Rapid Transit Rly. Co., 45 Kan. 503 ; Johnson v. McLain, 79 Kan. 423 .) … (The State v. Montgomery, 8 Kan. 351 ; Myers v. Knabe, 51 Kan. 720 .)

Brown v. Benzinger

118 Md. 29 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 27, 1912

Words & Phrases 3128; Haverly v. Elliott, 39 Neb. 201 ; Munsey v. Butterfield, 133 Mass. 492 ; Howard v. Taylor, 90 Ala. 241 , and others. Or, as defined in Knoedler v. Boussod (U. … Gorman, 65 Ga. 11 ; Findlay v. Carson, 97 Iowa, 537 ; Bergamini v Bastain, 35 La. Ann. 60 ; Bassett v. Percival, 5 Allen, (Mass.) 345; and Cottrell v.

Warren v. Brown

31 Neb. 8 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1890

R. v. Redick, 14 Neb., 56 ; Cheney v. Cooper, Id., 413; Smith v. Kaiser, 17 Id., 186.) There is another reason why the ground urged for quashing the bill cannot be sustained. … The filing of such written consent was necessary to confer jurisdiction upon the county board to establish á consent road. Without it their proceedings are a nullity. (Beatty v. Beethe, 23 Neb., 210 ; Doody v.

Brown v. Parks

80 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1921

Park v. School District 65, 63 Okla 233, 164 Pac. 102 ; McGuire v. McGuire, 78 Okla 164, 189 Pac. 193 . … Chapter 18, Session Laws 1910-11; Thomason et al. v. Champlin, 43 Okla. 86 , 141 Pac. 411 . It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Howard v. Brown

37 Neb. 902 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1893

Here there is no limitation upon the discretion of the board, and no such exception • with respect to gardens, orchards, or buildings as is found in section 7. … (See Albertson v. State, 9 Neb., 430 .)