Case law

Brown v. State

105 Tex. Crim. 586 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1926

Brown v. McAdoo

195 Iowa 286 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 9, 1922

Bussler v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 165 Iowa 361 ; Ames v. Waterloo & C. F. R. T. Co., 120 Iowa 640 ; Thompson v. Chicago G. W. R. Co., 162 Iowa 468 ; Golinvaux v. Burlington, C. R. & N. R. Co., 125 Iowa 652 . … Beemer v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 181 Iowa 642 ; Morris v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 101 Neb. 479 ( 163 N. W. 799 ); Brommer v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 179 Fed. 577 ; Howe v. Corey, 172 Wis. 537 ( 179 N.

Brown v. State

538 So. 2d 833 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 2, 1989

James Richard Brown appeals his conviction of first-degree murder and sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. … In Roberts v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 1027 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2017

Brown v. Morison

5 Ark. 217 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1843

Brown vs. Gilman, 4 Wheat. 255 . By parting with his equitable lien, he surely did not annul the rights he possessed by virtue of his covenant. … It recites Brown’s covenant to Cole and authorizes Woodruff to have the deed executed to himself upon the payment of the purchase money.

Page v. Brown

192 Ga. 398 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 16, 1941

Mentone Hotel & Realty Co. v. Taylor, 161 Ga. 237 ( 130 S. E. 527 ); Simpson v. Kelley, 171 Ga. 523 ( 156 S. E. 198 ). … Morris v. Mobley, 171 Ga. 224 (1, 6) ( 155 S. E. 8 ); Moody v. McHan, 184 Ga. 740, 744 ( 193 S. E. 240 ).

People v. Brown

501 Mich. 1040 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2018

Cooley v. Brown

30 Iowa 470 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 27, 1870

Dox v. Backentose's admx., 12 Wend. 542 ; Babcock v. Booth, 2 Hill, 181 ; Bates v. Graham, 11 N. … Elder v. Littler, 15 Iowa, 65 .

State v. Brown

2019 Ohio 2261 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2019

Shpakow v. Brown

300 Mich. 678 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1942

In Cardinal v. … In Peronto v.

Brown v. Dewey

1 Sand. Ch. 56 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 22, 1843

In 1838, he discounted for the complainant a note of $200, made by the latter, and also signed by his brother, Parlia Brown, and payable with interest. … Such were Manlove v. Bale, Strong v. Stewart, Henry v. Davis & Clark, Wright v. Bates, Skinner v. Miller, Edrington v. Harper, and Roach v. Cozine , above cited. In Palmer v.

Brown v. Green

133 La. 725 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 4, 1912

This point was directly decided in Hillard v. Taylor, 114 La. 890 , 38 South. 594 . … Day v. Bailey, 116 La. 962 , 41 South. 223 ; Succ. of Hardesty, 29 La. Ann. 289 . [3] Lastly, there can be no irreparable injury. There was sufficient irreparable injury to justify granting the appeal.

Spain v. Brown

236 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Truelove v. R. R., 222 N.C. 704 , 24 S.E. 2d 537 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . The only pleading on the part of the defendant is either a demurrer or an answer. G-.S. 1-124. … The rule which prohibits the incorporation of extraneous, evidential, irrelevant, impertinent, or scandalous matter in a complaint or answer, G.S. 1-153; Brown v. Hall, supra; Truelove v. R. R., supra; Parlier v.

State v. Brown

486 A.2d 595 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jan 10, 1985

Id. at 1082 ; 4 see also United *600 States v. Greater Syracuse Board of Realtors, 449 F.Supp. 887, 894 (N.D.N.Y.1978); United States v. Andreas, 374 F.Supp. 402, 406-07 (D.Minn.1974); 1 C. … Brown, 391 Mass. 157, 160 , 460 N.E.2d 606, 608 (1984); Druzik v. Board of Health of Haverhill, 324 Mass. 129, 133 , 85 N.E.2d 232, 234 (1949).

Elliott v. Brown

13 La. Ann. 579 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Aug 15, 1858

But it is said that Bryce Elliott’s answers to interrogatories propounded to him by the plaintiff in that suit, herein represented by Brown, executor, did interrupt prescription.

Welsh v. Brown

339 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 20, 1936

In the late case of Ballenger et al. v. Windes, 338 Mo. 1039 , 93 S.W.2d 882 , Division One, by a divided court, overruled Tooker v. Missouri Power Light Co. and Williams v. … [Bell v. Barrett, supra; Indian Creek Land Co. v. Bradford (Mo.), 82 S.W.2d 589 .] [3] Both parties cite Swope v.

Woolsey v. . Brown

74 N.Y. 82 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1878

Brown, which was affirmed upon appeal to the General Term. Brown then appealed to this court, and gave an undertaking upon such appeal, which was executed by the defendant, a married woman, as surety. … Co. v. Babcock ; and *85 that case has never been questioned in this court, but has been uniformly followed. (Carpenter v. O'Dougherty, 50 N. Y., 660 ; Maxon v. Scott, 55 id., 247 ; Manhattan B. and M. Co. v.

Smith v. Brown

3 Tex. 360 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1848

Brown v. LeMay

101 Ark. 95 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1911

Harrell v. Hill, supra; Ryan v. Batchelor, 95 Ark. 375 . … Hill, supra; Goodwin v. Robinson, 30 Ark. 535 ; Neeley v. Rembert, 19 Ark. 253 ; Joseph v. Baker, 95 Ark. 150 ; Ryan v. Batchelor, supra.

People v. Brown

29 N.Y.3d 1076 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2017