Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

1.71s

  • Brown v. Loftin

    154 Fla. 621 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 20, 1944

    .: This is a railway accident case in which Miss Nancy Virginia Brown lost her life. … The trial court Held that the declaration failed to state a cause of action and bottomed his conclusions on cases viz: Kimball v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co. 132 Fla. 235 , 181 So. 533 ; Cline v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    170 A.3d 1052 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    9 A.3d 1232 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Dec 14, 2010

    Brown, 549 A.2d 1373, 1377 (R.I.1988). A “taking” occurs “[w]hen a defendant takes possession of another’s property.” State v. Holley, 604 A.2d 772, 774 (R.I.1992). … State v. Brown, 619 A.2d 828, 831 (R.I.1993). We previously have held that even prejudicial remarks do not necessarily require the granting of a motion to pass. State v. Gautier, 950 A.2d 400, 417 (R.I.2008).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Clarke

    211 Ga. 61 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 13, 1954

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dennis

    136 Ga. 300 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 11, 1911

    Brown v. Dennis, 133 Ga. 791 ( 66 S. E. 1080 ). … The petition, which contained allegations in substance as disclosed in the former decision of the case, was not open to general demurrer; nor, under the ruling in the case of Nally v. Nally, 74 Ga. 669 (58 Am.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Brown

    86 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1882

    Brown, because of his having departed from the state before the bond sued on had matured, and his being continuously absent since. The proviso, contained in Rev. … In Lane v. Richardson, 79 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Beckwith

    58 W. Va. 140 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1905

    Burt v. Allen, 48 W. … The language in Burt v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    239 Mont. 453 · Montana Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1989

    On March 7, 1988, Kathy Brown, the wife of defendant Warren Brown, had asked the defendant to watch their two children---Amber, age 3, and Crystal, age I--- for the day. … State v. Tracy (Mont. 1988), 761 P.2d 398, 400, 45 St.Rep. 1705, 1707; State v. Cox (Mont. 1987), 733 P.2d 1307, 1309, 44 St.Rep. 496, 498.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hardcastle

    63 Md. 484 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 15, 1885

    Brown, compound interest has been allowed, to that extent, as against Lapham, a subsequent mortgagee, without either actual or constructive notice of such settlement and allowance, Brown’s claim should be abated. … But if the property shall sell for enough to pay Brown and Lapham both, with the compound interest included, then Brown will not be abated; and he will only be abated on account thereof to such extent as such computation

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hilleary

    133 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1930

    We are not unmindful of the decision in Sappingfield v. … In Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 ( 157 P. 756 , 4 A. L.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wright v. . Brown

    116 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

    It has been held, as far back as McDonald v. McDonald, 5 Jones Eq., 211 , followed by the cases of Masten v. Marlow, 65 N. C., 695 , Bodenhamer v. Welch, 89 N. … The second taker is fixed by the will, which makes this ease stronger for the defendant Brown than that case was for the defendant Hackett. Tbe case of Starnes v. Hill, 112 N.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    212 Ariz. 225 · Arizona Supreme Court · Mar 16, 2006

    State v. Brown (McMullen) (“McMullen I”), 205 Ariz. 325, 326 ¶ 2, 70 P.3d 454, 455 (App. 2003). The court of appeals held that the “statutory maximum” for purposes of Apprendi and Blakely v. … State v. Brown (McMullen) (“McMullen III”), 210 Ariz. 534, 536 ¶ 1, 115 P.3d 128, 130 (App. 2005).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    312 Ill. 63 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1924

    Justice Dunn delivered the opinion of the court: At the March term, 1922, of the circuit court of Hardin county the grand jury returned an indictment against William Brown, charging that he “feloniously, willfully and maliciously … Klawanski v. People, 218 Ill. 481 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • McGuire v. Brown

    106 Cal. 660 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1895

    (Sturr v. Beck, 133 U. S. 547 -49, citing Chotard v. Pope, 12 Wheat. 588 ; Hastings etc. R. R. Co. v. Whitney, 132 U. S. 357 .) … Brown’s claims as a homestead settler were subordinate to those interests and his land was subject to a servitude for the support of the same. (De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal. 397 ; Wells v. Mantes, 99 Cal. 583 .)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Driggers

    60 Ga. 114 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 15, 1878

    Driggers and children, to set aside a deed made by Mark Driggers and wife to Brown, for a tract of land alleged to be the homestead of the family. … The jury, under charge of the court, found for complainants ; a decree was entered accordingly, and Brown moved for a new trial. The motion was overruled and he excepted. The case turns on a single point.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Crockett

    8 La. Ann. 30 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 15, 1853

    In Burbeehaux v. … See DeKerlegand v. Robins, 1 Annual, 227. Parker v. Moore, 2 Annual, 1017. Judgment affirmed with costs.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    98 Va. 366 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 21, 1900

    Brown is a merchant in the county of Branklin, and has -the license required by law for the privilege of doing business as a merchant in that county. … Supervisors v. Tallent, 96 Va. 723 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Litson v. Brown

    26 Ind. 489 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1866

    Brown, the appellee, sued Litson, the appellant, for board, clothing, washing and care furnished by him to Ann Litson, the wife of the appellant, from the 1st of November, 1864, to the 16th of October, 1865. … See Chitty on Con., p. 171, et seq.; 1 Parsons on Con., title “Married Women,” § 3, p. 345; Liddlow v. Willmot, 2 Stark. R. 86; Dixon v. Hurrell, 8 Car. & P. 717. Walker and Matthews, for appellant.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Orr v. Brown

    5 Ga. 400 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 15, 1848

    The only charge which implicates Brown, the purchaser at sheriff’s sale, is that he “ threw doubts upon the title of the defendant in execution.” What did he do at the sale? … There is no issuable fact, charged by the complainant, in relation to the conduct of Brown at the sale.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mailhot

    89 N.H. 240 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jan 4, 1938

    Fraser v. Railway, 84 N. H. 107; Niemi v. Railroad, 87 N. H. 1. … Dando v. Brobst, 318 Pa. St. 325. As in Fraser v. Railway, supra, the plaintiff “gave an impossible account of his conduct. ...

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.