Case law

State v. Brown

231 N.J. 526 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 8, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown

170 A.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2017

Walters v. Brown

15 Md. 285 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 18, 1860

McJilton, and indorsed by Edward Sped-den, Samuel Brown and W. T. Walters & Co. The note is dated, “Baito., February 1857,” and all the parties to the same reside in Baltimore. … , Baltimore, were delivered to the defendant, as the only Samuel Brown who was served by the penny-post; that tbie defendant was a well known citizen, living in Baltimore.

Brown v. Beck

64 Ariz. 299 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1946

Beebe v. Farish, 14 Ariz. 231 , 127 P. 715 ; Dowdy v. Calvi, 14 Ariz. 148 , 125 P. 873 . … In our case of Webb v.

Williams v. Brown

76 Iowa 643 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 24, 1889

Norman v. Winc h , 65 Iowa, 263 ; Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Haven, 65 Iowa, 359 ; Watson v. Moeller, 63 Iowa, 161 ; Watson v. Van Meter, 43 Iowa, 76 ; Wire v. Foster, 62 Iowa, 114 ; Insurance Co. v. … Findley, 59 Iowa, 591 ; Rowley v. Jewett, 56 Iowa, 492 ; Portman v. Klemish, 54 Iowa, 198 . III.

Brown v. Bailey

177 Tenn. 185 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1941

Brown, was employed by defendant as a night watchman at defendant’s warehouse in Chattanooga, where the liquor was stored. … United States v. Erie Railroad Co., 280 U. S., 98 , 50 S. Ct., 51 , 74 L. Ed., 187 ; Dozier v. Alabama, 218 U. S., 124 , 30 S. Ct., 649 , 54 L. Ed., 965 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.), 264; Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.

Brown v. Wrightsman

175 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1935

Brown.” … This court, in the case of Walker v.

King v. Brown

55 So. 2d 187 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 27, 1951

55 So.2d 187 (1951) KING et al. v. BROWN et al. Supreme Court of Florida, Division B. November 27, 1951. *188 Lewis W. Petteway, D. Fred McMullen and Guyte P. McCord, Jr., Tallahassee, Richard W. Ervin, Atty. … Compare Howse & Holloman v. Judson, 1 Fla. 133 ; Loring v. Wittich, 16 Fla. 323 ; Ballard v. Kennedy, 34 Fla. 483 , 16 So. 327 ; Witt v. Baars, 36 Fla. 119 , 18 So. 330 .

Disputesuite, LLC v. Scoreinc.com

216 Cal. Rptr. 3d 109 · California Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2017

Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. … (Presley of Southern California v. Whelan, supra, at p. 963; see Mustachio v.

Brown v. Crane

47 Ga. 483 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 15, 1873

with one Dilles and others, by threats, etc., induced Maulden, who was an old man, to sell the land to him and assign to him Wyley’s bond for title; that Brown went into the possession of the land, under his purchase from … The piayer of the bill is that Brown may be decreed to execute a title to the land to the complainant.

Abbott v. Brown

131 Ill. 108 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1889

In Dickerson v. Derrickson, 39 Ill. 574 , this court, in speaking of a guaranty, says: “The contract of an absolute guaranty is, that if the principal fails to pay, the guarantor will. … .”- See, also, Rich v. Hathaway, 18 Ill. 548 . Here, Newell, as maker of the promissory note, agreed to pay a certain sum of money at a certain time.

Gurley v. Brown

65 Nev. 245 · Nevada Supreme Court · May 21, 1948

of councilmen and the individual members could act only as such board. *255 In Coldwater v. … In a number of later Tennessee cases the full import of Hale v. Johnston was not followed. In Johnson City Board of Education v.

Brown v. State

805 S.E.2d 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2017

Brown v. Lindsay

68 Nev. 196 · Nevada Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1951

This was the inadvertent disengaging of the clutch by Christensen and his helper in the course of removing the deck or floor board in order to get at the clutch mechanism. … Brown for redress; that appellant Brown disclaimed responsibility, agreeing only to repair the tractor as quickly as possible.

Brown v. Cozard

68 Ill. 178 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1873

Brown v. Kennedy

309 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1925

In the case of Fletcher v. Daugherty, 13 N. W. … Reilly, 61 Mo. 565 ; *341 Philips v. Bailey, 82 Mo. 639 ; Wolz v. Parker, 134 Mo. 458 ; State ex rel. v. Ross, 136 Mo. 259 ; Potter v. Schaffer, 209 Mo. 586 .

Warren v. Brown

31 Neb. 8 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1890

R. v. Redick, 14 Neb., 56 ; Cheney v. Cooper, Id., 413; Smith v. Kaiser, 17 Id., 186.) There is another reason why the ground urged for quashing the bill cannot be sustained. … The filing of such written consent was necessary to confer jurisdiction upon the county board to establish á consent road. Without it their proceedings are a nullity. (Beatty v. Beethe, 23 Neb., 210 ; Doody v.

Hannam v. Brown

114 Nev. 350 · Nevada Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1998

The trust provided, in pertinent part, that “[t]he shares established for Dennis Brown and Lance Brown shall be known as the Wife’s Trust Share, if either Dennis Brown or Lance Brown should die without issue, their share … shall go to the survivor of either Dennis Brown or Lance Brown.”

State v. Brown

302 So. 2d 290 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 28, 1974

302 So.2d 290 (1974) STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph A. BROWN and William Matthews. No. 54911. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 28, 1974. *291 James C. Dixon, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants. William J. … In State v.

Brown v. State

35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 348 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 17, 2010

V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. After this Court affirmed Brown’s conviction for first-degree murder and his sentence of death on direct appeal, see Brown v. … Brown v. State, 846 So.2d 1114 (Fla.2003). In 2008, Brown filed this successive motion for postconviction relief alleging newly discovered evidence, a claim under Brady v.