Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

3.87s

  • State v. Brown

    427 P.3d 102 · Montana Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    813 S.E.2d 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Phillips

    40 Mich. 264 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1879

    Brown, Sarah E. Brown, Caroline Wilson, Abigail Davis, Jemima J. Munger, and Mary Phillips, wife of defendant in error. Of these heirs Thomas S. Brown, Sarah E. Brown, Emeline A. Brown and Caroline Wilson are parties. … Brown and he thus became owner of two shares. February 17, 1868, the widow, Thomas S. Brown, Sarah E. Brown and Caroline Wilson quit-claimed their interests to Wier L. Drake.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    283 Ark. 304 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1984

    Appellee Levert Brown was charged with violating Act 549 of 1983 [Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 75-2501 — 75-2533 (Supp. 1983)], driving while intoxicated (D.W.I.), fourth offense. … See Finch v. State, 262 Ark. 313 , 556 S.W.2d 434 (1977) and Silas v. State, 232 Ark. 248 , 337 S.W.2d 644 (1960). The trial court erred in refusing to allow the state to amend the information.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    503 Mich. 884 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 30, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Main v. Brown

    72 Tex. 505 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1889

    On the 29th day of May, 1863, Brown was also appointed, by the same court, guardian of the persons and estates of the minor legatees. … In support of his position he cites the cases of Michael Murphy, Administrator, v. Menard et al., 14 Texas, 62 ; Portis v. Cummings, Id., 139 ; and Marks v. Hill, 46 Texas, 350 . The case of Murphy v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    503 Mich. 887 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 30, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Brown

    75 Miss. 214 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1897

    There was no error in overruling the motion to dismiss the appeal of Brown from the order of the board of aldermen. … In Rogers v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    227 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1947

    The defendant is relying upon S. v. McLean, 224 N. C., 704 , 32 S. E. (2d), 227 ; S. v. DeGraffenreid, 223 N. C., 461 , 27 S. E. (2d), 130 ; S. v. Feyd, 213 N. C., 617 , 197 S. E., 171 ; S. v. Ratcliff, 199 N. … S. v. Ratcliff, supra; S. v. Jackson, supra; S. v. Ferrell, 205 N. C.., 640, 170 S. E., 186 ; S. v. Satterfield, 207 N. C., 118 , 176 S. E., 466 ; S. v. Hairston, 222 N. C., 455 , 23 S. E. (2d), 885 ; S. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Caldwell

    231 Ga. 795 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 7, 1974

    . § 77-307 provides that the State Board of Corrections *796 shall promulgate rules relative to the treatment, discipline, and conditions of confinement of all inmates coming under its custody. … . § 77-308 provides that all rules enacted by the board shall be reasonable. Submitted November 16, 1973 Decided March 7, 1974. John X. Brown, pro se. Arthur K.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hathaway v. Brown

    22 Minn. 214 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Oct 5, 1875

    Lemay v. Bibeau, 2 Minn. 291 ; Scott v. Edes, 3 Minn. 377 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    301 So. 2d 605 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 11, 1974

    301 So.2d 605 (1974) STATE of Louisiana v. W. O. BROWN. No. 54663. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 11, 1974. *606 Walton J. Barnes, II, Barnes & Barnes, Baton Rouge, for defendant-relator. William J. … Article 778 C.Cr.P.; see State v. Patterson, 295 So.2d 792 (La.1974); State v. Douglas, 278 So.2d 485 (La.1973).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Oattis

    55 Ga. 416 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 15, 1875

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Byrne v. Brown

    40 Fla. 109 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1898

    Hagan v. Ellis, 39 Fla. 463 , 22 South. Rep. 727 . … Stockton v. Williams, 1 Doug. (Mich.) 546; Bishop of Chicago v. *116 Chiniquy, 74 Ill. 317 ; Savage v. Allen, 54 N. Y. 458 ; Deweese v. Reinhard, 165 U. S. 386 , 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 340; Hawkinberry v. Snodgrass, 39 W.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Guthrie

    110 N.Y. 435 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1888

    In form it was an absolute sale upon a chattel mortgage given for a fixed and agreed consideration; and while, nevertheless, such a sale, in spite of its form, may be proved to be an assignment in trust (Britton v. … (Brackett v. Harvey, 91 N. Y. 214 .) We see no- just reason why this creditor who defends should lose the preference which he obtained.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    210 Md. 301 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 14, 1956

    In James v. … In Hoke v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Brown

    793 So. 2d 601 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2001

    Stewart v. Merchants Nat'l Bank , 700 So.2d 255 , 258 (Miss. 1997). … Hester v. Bandy , 627 So.2d 833 , 841 (Miss. 1993) (citation omitted).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Davidson

    42 Okla. 598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1914

    Culbertson v. Mann, 30 Okla. 249 , 120 Pac. 918 ; Amer. Job. Ass’n v. … The facts of this case, therefore, bring it squarely within the rule announced by the Territorial Supreme Court in the case of Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Chernaik v. Brown

    367 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2020

    Chernaik v. Brown, 295 Or App 584, 601, 436 P3d 26 (2019). … Chernaik v. Brown, 367 Or 143, 166, 475 P3d 68 (2020).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bryan

    6 Idaho 1 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1898

    Bank v. Williams, 2 Idaho, 670 , 23 Pac. 552 ; Kelley v. Leachman, 3 Idaho, 392 , 29 Pac. 849 , and eases there cited; Wilson v. Thompson, 4 Idaho, 678 , 43 Pac. 557 .) … This court has so decided, substantially, in the case of Hawkins v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.