Case law

Woods v. Brown

93 Ind. 164 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1884

In Williams v. … Allison v Taylor, 6 Dana, 87 ( 32 Am. Dec. 68 ); Wood v. Bayard, 63 Pa. St. 320; Foster v. Jones, 23 Ga. 168 ; Sacramento Savings Bank v. Spencer, 53 Cal. 737; Stigers v. Brent, 50 Md. 214 (33 Am. R. 317); Johnson v.

Miller v. Brown

47 Mo. 504 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1871

Brown. … Brown.

State v. Brown

204 Kan. 430 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 24, 1970

(Johnson v. State, 203 Kan. 947 , 457 P. 2d 181 ; State v. Wright, 203 Kan. 54 , 453 P. 2d 1 .) … In Brown v. State, 198 Kan. 527 , 426 P. 2d 49 , this court stated: “. . .

Holbrook v. Brown

2 Mass. 280 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1807

When this cargo was laden on board at Canton, the master, in virtue of the contract between him and the owners, was entitled to 7jj 100th parts of it.

Alexander v. Brown

793 So. 2d 601 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2001

Stewart v. Merchants Nat'l Bank , 700 So.2d 255 , 258 (Miss. 1997). … Hester v. Bandy , 627 So.2d 833 , 841 (Miss. 1993) (citation omitted).

State v. Brown

2018 Ohio 1990 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2018

Brown v. State

55 Ark. 593 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 19, 1892

See also Thompson v. State, 17 S. W. Rep., 448 ; Hunt v. State, 9 Texas App., 166; Steagald v. State, 24 Texas App., 207; Dillard v. State, 58 Miss., 368 ; State v. Rainsbarger, 74 Iowa, 196 ; Davis v. … Pond v. People, 8 Mich., 177 ; Carroll v. State, 23 Ala., 28 ; State v. Patterson, 45 Vt., 308 .

Brown v. Cogdell.

136 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1904

Connor v. Dillard, 129 N. C., 50 ; Roberts v. Connor, 125 N. C., 45 ; Alliance v. Murrill, 119 N. C., 124 . … In Smithdeal v. Wilkinson, 100 N.

Brown v. Willoughby

5 Colo. 1 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 15, 1879

Clark v. Gridley, 49 California, 108; Rycraft v. Rycraft, 42 California, 444; Reed v. Bernal, 40 California, 628 (overruling Treadwell v. Davis, 34 California, 601); Rush v. Casey, 39 California, 339; Hihn v. … The affidavit in attachment, the writ, judgment, indemnity bond, the special execution and the return thereof, in the suit of Brown v.

Wyman v. Brown

50 Me. 139 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Ricker v. Ham, 14 Mass., 137; Clapp v. Leatherbee, 18 Pick., 131 ; Beal v. Warner, 2 Gray, 447 ; Wadsworth v. Havens, 3 Wend., 411 ; Hudnal v. Wilder, 4 McCord, 295 . … J., in Clapp v. Tirrell, 20 Pick., 247 . The circumstances surrounding Mrs. Brown are more than sufficient to Control the consideration clause in the deed.

People v. Brown

917 N.W.2d 668 · Michigan Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2018

Huff v. Brown

941 N.W.2d 515 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2020

BROWN Cite as 305 Neb. 648 Herchel H. Huff, appellee, v. … See Russell v. Clarke, 15 Neb.

Brown v. People

132 Colo. 561 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Dec 5, 1955

Brown v. People, 130 Colo. 77 , 273 P. (2d) P128. The cause came regularly on for retrial on May 2,1955. … Justice Story, U.S. v.

Juarez v. State

758 S.W.2d 772 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 27, 1988

See Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 , 87 S.Ct. 1873 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1967); Haynes v. State, 475 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Cr. App.1972). … In Miller, supra, 736 S.W.2d at 649, 650 , this Court, applying Brown v.

Fazio v. Brown

209 Conn. 450 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Dec 27, 1988

Fazio v. Brown, supra, 294 . … Fazio v. Brown, supra, 295 ; see also Malmberg v. Lopez, 208 Conn. 675, 679-80 , 546 A.2d 264 (1988).

Brown v. State

147 Ind. 28 · Indiana Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1897

Deilks v. State, 141 Ind. 23 ; Newport v. State, 140 Ind. 299 ; Walker v. State, 136 Ind. 663 ; Boyle v. State, 105 Ind. 469 ; McDermott v. State, 89 Ind. 187 ; Miller v. State, 37 Ind. 432 ; Murphy v. … Walker v. State, 8 *34 Ind. 290 ; Gillett on Crim. Law (2d ed.), p. 392, section 492; 1 Wharton Crim. Law, section 382.

Commonwealth v. Brown

351 Pa. Super. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1986

The neighbor subsequently identified *122 Roy Brown, the appellant, as the driver of the car. After the Commonwealth had proved these facts, a jury found Brown guilty of theft and conspiracy. … Brown had been observed by two neighbors who confronted him as he carried the television set and lace tablecloth from the Murtland home.

Brown v. Tolles

7 Cal. 398 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

The respondent, who has filed a brief in this case, seems to rely on the fact that no motion was made for a new trial, and contends, on the authority of Hill v. White, and Brown v.

State v. Brown

509 N.W.2d 69 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1993

State v. VandeHoven, 388 N.W.2d 857 (N.D.1986). This standard requires less than probable cause but more than a mere hunch. State v. Sarhegyi supra, 492 N.W.2d at 286 . … See State v. Langseth, 492 N.W.2d 298, 300 (N.D.1992); Cady v. Dombrowski 413 U.S. 433, 441 , 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2528 , 37 L.Ed.2d 706, 714-15 (1973); see also People v.

Campbell v. Brown

276 Mich. 449 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1936

Stanley Brown, and the title of which stood in the name of Bernard’s father, Bert McGuire. Mrs. … : Cook v. Hoertz & Son, 198 Mich. 129 ; Reiss v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co., 201 Mich. 90 ; Cramer v. West Bay City Sugar Co., 201 Mich. 500 ; Adams v. W. E. Wood Co., 203 Mich. 673 .