Case law

Brown v. State

253 Ga. 363 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 1, 1984

Jones v. State, 249 Ga. 605, 608 ( 293 SE2d 708 ) (1982); Blankenship v. State, 247 Ga. 590, 595-6 ( 277 SE2d 505 ) (1981). … Anderson v. State, 247 Ga. 397, 399 ( 276 SE2d 603 ) (1981).

Ferguson v. Brown

75 Miss. 214 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1897

There was no error in overruling the motion to dismiss the appeal of Brown from the order of the board of aldermen. … In Rogers v.

Brown v. Caldwell

231 Ga. 795 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 7, 1974

. § 77-307 provides that the State Board of Corrections *796 shall promulgate rules relative to the treatment, discipline, and conditions of confinement of all inmates coming under its custody. … . § 77-308 provides that all rules enacted by the board shall be reasonable. Submitted November 16, 1973 Decided March 7, 1974. John X. Brown, pro se. Arthur K.

Hathaway v. Brown

22 Minn. 214 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Oct 5, 1875

Lemay v. Bibeau, 2 Minn. 291 ; Scott v. Edes, 3 Minn. 377 .

Brown v. Hitchcock

28 Vt. 452 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 15, 1856

Holbrook v. Brown

2 Mass. 280 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1807

When this cargo was laden on board at Canton, the master, in virtue of the contract between him and the owners, was entitled to 7jj 100th parts of it.

Alexander v. Brown

793 So. 2d 601 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2001

Stewart v. Merchants Nat'l Bank , 700 So.2d 255 , 258 (Miss. 1997). … Hester v. Bandy , 627 So.2d 833 , 841 (Miss. 1993) (citation omitted).

State v. . Brown

95 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

The indictments, three in number, found by the grand jury at the same term and treated as separate counts in a single bill, under the ruling in *686 State v. Johnson, 5 Jones, 221 , and State v. Watts, 82 N.

Brown v. Willoughby

5 Colo. 1 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 15, 1879

Clark v. Gridley, 49 California, 108; Rycraft v. Rycraft, 42 California, 444; Reed v. Bernal, 40 California, 628 (overruling Treadwell v. Davis, 34 California, 601); Rush v. Casey, 39 California, 339; Hihn v. … The affidavit in attachment, the writ, judgment, indemnity bond, the special execution and the return thereof, in the suit of Brown v.

Wyman v. Brown

50 Me. 139 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Ricker v. Ham, 14 Mass., 137; Clapp v. Leatherbee, 18 Pick., 131 ; Beal v. Warner, 2 Gray, 447 ; Wadsworth v. Havens, 3 Wend., 411 ; Hudnal v. Wilder, 4 McCord, 295 . … J., in Clapp v. Tirrell, 20 Pick., 247 . The circumstances surrounding Mrs. Brown are more than sufficient to Control the consideration clause in the deed.

State v. Brown

41 La. Ann. 345 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1889

Brown v. Sutkowski

117 Vt. 377 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Oct 7, 1952

Lincoln v. C. V. Ry. Co., 82 Vt 187, 198, 72 A 821; Baldwin v. Gaines, 92 Vt 61, 73, 102 A 338. … Baldwin v. Gaines, supra.

Brown v. Strait

19 Ill. 88 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1857

The case of Eddy v. Roberts, 17 Ill. R. 505, decides the question here.

Brown v. Mason

155 Cal. 155 · California Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1909

Lindley sent Brown to Mason in November, 1904. … (Coleman v. Meade, 13 Bush. 358; Charlton v. Wood, 11 Heisk. 19 .)

State v. Brown

191 Wash. 2d 1010 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2018

Juarez v. State

758 S.W.2d 772 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 27, 1988

See Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 , 87 S.Ct. 1873 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1967); Haynes v. State, 475 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Cr. App.1972). … In Miller, supra, 736 S.W.2d at 649, 650 , this Court, applying Brown v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

351 Pa. Super. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1986

The neighbor subsequently identified *122 Roy Brown, the appellant, as the driver of the car. After the Commonwealth had proved these facts, a jury found Brown guilty of theft and conspiracy. … Brown had been observed by two neighbors who confronted him as he carried the television set and lace tablecloth from the Murtland home.

State v. Brown

509 N.W.2d 69 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1993

State v. VandeHoven, 388 N.W.2d 857 (N.D.1986). This standard requires less than probable cause but more than a mere hunch. State v. Sarhegyi supra, 492 N.W.2d at 286 . … See State v. Langseth, 492 N.W.2d 298, 300 (N.D.1992); Cady v. Dombrowski 413 U.S. 433, 441 , 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2528 , 37 L.Ed.2d 706, 714-15 (1973); see also People v.

State v. Brown

53 Idaho 576 · Idaho Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1933

The appellant, James Brown, was convicted of the crime of attempt to commit arson. … (State v. Orr, supra; State v. Knudtson, supra; State v. Gillum, supra.) In the case of State v.

State v. Brown

22 Kan. 222 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1879

Law, § 1027; Wiggins v. The People, 3 Otto, 465 ; Little v. The State, H. & T. Cases of Self-Defense, 490; and also the cases cited in these authorities. statement of facts. … We repeat what we said in the case of the State v.