Case law

Brown v. Schmitz

237 Iowa 418 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 2, 1946

In the fall of 1942 plaintiffs, Brown and Sylling, were partners who operated a livestock sale barn at Spring Grove in southeastern Minnesota. … Andreas & Son v. Hempy, 221 Iowa 1184 , 268 N. W. 13 , and cases cited; Markley v. Western Union Tel. Co., 151 Iowa 612, 615 , 132 N. W. 37 ; Emmerson & Co. v. Converse, 106 Iowa 330, 331, 332 , 76 N. W. 705 .

People v. Brown

99 N.Y.2d 488 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2003

To support his argument, he points to our observation in People v Collins ( 82 NY2d 177 [1993]) that the exclusion for pretrial motions under CPL 30.30 (4) (a) “generally refers to delays attributable to responding to and … Specifically, defendant contends that the People were not entitled to the charge because it was never shown that his half brother was in his “control” (see People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428-429 [1986]).

Brown v. Bigelow

325 Mass. 4 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 8, 1949

See Damiano v. National Grange Mutual Liability Co. 316 Mass. 626, 630 ; Kenyon v. Chicopee, 320 Mass. 528, 531 . Since the decision in Carter v. Yardley & Co. … Ebers v. General Chemical Co. 310 Mich. 261 (spray for fruit *6 trees). Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 (oil for poultry). Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Association v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. 263 N.

Brown v. Slack

159 Neb. 142 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1954

Mary Brown brought this action in the district court for Lincoln County against Everett Slack, doing business as Slack’s Grocery. … Glenn v. Grant Co., supra; Rankin v. J. L. Brandeis & Sons, supra. As stated in Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v.

Smith v. Brown

302 Mass. 432 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 1, 1939

Ed.] c. 231, § 85; Sooserian v. … In Clarke v.

Brown v. Warren

16 Nev. 228 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1881

(Toland v. Mundell, 38 Cal. 43 ; Dilly v. Sherman, 2 Nev. 69 .) In Bludworth v. … (Mateer v. Brown, 1 Cal. 222 ; Baker v. Joseph, 16 Id. 180; Kiler v. Kimbal, 10 Id. 268.) Besides, as was said in Sharon v.

Dillard v. Brown

363 Or. 744 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2018

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Dillard v. Premo, 362 Or. 41 , 403 P.3d 746 (2017). Review Allowed

Commonwealth v. Brown

376 Mass. 156 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 15, 1978

Brown, the defendant, and two of Mrs. Brown’s other children went to bed. Mrs. … Brown. 1. Photographic Identification.

Tozier v. Brown

202 Pa. 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1902

Brown sold all their interests in the lands. Thereafter Brown and Early had no interest in the lands. … As said by the referee there was no evidence before him which would relieve the plaintiffs from the charge of laches. “ A court of equity,” says Lord Camden in Smith v. Clay, 3 Bro. C.

State v. Brown

236 N.J. 105 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 2018

Herzog v. Brown

243 N.Y. 599 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1926

Brown v. Olmsted

50 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

(Griffith v. Grogan, 12 Cal. 320 ; Welch v. Allington, 23 Cal. 322 ; Brewster v. Bours, 8 Cal. 506 .) We think it unnecessary to discuss other points made by the appellant. We find no error in the record.

Hamilton v. Brown

18 Pa. 87 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1851

little does this enter into the remedy, that it is not even necessary that the assignee’s name should appear in the proceedings; nor will the defendant be permitted to controvert the validity of the transfer: Blanchard v. … An assignee need show no right in himself ; it is enough if he show a right in the legal plaintiff, for it is this right alone that can be enforced: Montgomery v. Cook, 6 Watts 238 .

State v. Brown

159 N.H. 544 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 31, 2009

We reversed his convictions in State v. Brown,, 156 N.H. 440 (2007), and remanded the case to the trial court. … Brown, 156 N.H. at 442-44 .

Diggins v. Brown

76 Cal. 318 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1888

(People v. Lynch, 51 Cal. 19 and 20; 21 Am. Rep. 677 .) We therefore advise that the judgment and order denying a new trial be reversed, with directions to dismiss the action. Foote, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.

Keyes v. Brown

155 Conn. 469 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 26, 1967

Eastern Color Printing Co. v. Jenks, 150 Conn. 444, 450 , 190 A.2d 591 ; Blake v. Meyers, 145 Conn. 612, 616 , 145 A.2d 584 ; see also Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co., 33 Cal. 2d 564, 573 , 203 P.2d 758 . … Mandeville v. Jacobson, 122 Conn. 429, 433 , 189 A. 596 ; Loveland v. Aymett’s Auto Arcade, Inc., 121 Conn. 231, 236 , 184 A. 376 ; Bitondi v. Sheketoff, 91 Conn. 123, 126 , 99 A. 505 ; 5 Corbin, Contracts §1114.

Brown v. State

516 S.W.2d 145 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 4, 1974

Thompson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 343 . … Broussard v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 505 S.W.2d 282 . We are unable to say that the acts of the jurors in this case “operated to injure or prejudice” appellant. Flores v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 146 .

Allen v. Brown

39 Iowa 330 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 25, 1874

S. v. Kirkpatrick, 9. Wheat., 720. Iowa v. U. S., 7. How., 681. See also 1 Am. Leading Cases, 299. Notice to Mayor v. Patten; Allen v. Culen, 3 Denio, 293 . Fairchild et al. v. Hawley et al., 10 Conn., 176 .

Brown v. State

253 Ga. 363 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 1, 1984

Jones v. State, 249 Ga. 605, 608 ( 293 SE2d 708 ) (1982); Blankenship v. State, 247 Ga. 590, 595-6 ( 277 SE2d 505 ) (1981). … Anderson v. State, 247 Ga. 397, 399 ( 276 SE2d 603 ) (1981).

Brown v. Herron

4 Yeates 560 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1808