Case law

Brown v. Commonwealth

458 S.W.2d 444 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Oct 2, 1970

In the cases of Marcum v. Commonwealth, Ky., 390 S.W.2d 884 ; Schweinefuss v. Commonwealth, Ky., 395 S.W.2d 370 ; and Russell v. … See for example United States v. Corallo, 309 F.Supp. 1282, 1284 (D.C.N.Y.1970); United States v. Fancher, 195 F.Supp. 634 (D.C.Conn.1960); United States v. Elliott, 418 F.2d 219 (C.A. 9th Cir. 1969); Tillman v.

Brown v. Balfour

12 L.R.A. 373 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Apr 8, 1891

The rule of construction *71 laid down by this court, (McNamara v. Minn. Cent. Ry. Co., 12 Minn. 269 , (388;) King v. … Jewell v. Grand Lodge, 41 Minn. 405 , ( 43 N. W. Rep. 88 ;) Am. Legion of Honor v. Perry, 140 Mass. 580 , (5 N. E. Rep. 634;) Ballou v. Gile, 50 Wis. 614 , ( 7 N. W. Rep. 561 .) Order affirmed.

Brown v. State

65 Tex. Crim. 121 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 31, 1912

Sannickson v. Brown

5 Cal. 57 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1855

is a suit brought in the Court below upon a number of accounts for labor and services, and for furnishing goods and materials for the defendants’ use and benefit, which accounts purport to be “audited and approved” by a Board … of Trustees of the “ Laura Virginia Association,” and are in some instances, “ certified to be correct” by the Board of Trustees of that Association.

Brown v. Harper

4 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870

Commonwealth v. Brown

195 A.3d 164 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2018

Brown v. Torrey

22 Tex. 54 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

(Weaver v. Shaw, 5 Tex. Rep, 286.) This case is plainly distinguishable from those in which affidavits have been received by this court, upon the question of its own jurisdiction. (Harris v. Hopson, 5 Tex. … Rep. 529 ; Dial v. Rector, 12 Tex. Rep. 99 ; Martel v. Hernsheim, 9 id. 294.) The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. McCord

20 Ind. 270 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1863

and that Brown, by reason of its passage through his laud, -will sustain damage to the amount of 100 dollars. … Upon the filing of this report, the Board ordered that a county order be issued to Isaac Broion for the damages assessed, &-c*> and that the proposed highway be opened, &c. • From this decision Brown appealed.

Brown v. State

223 Ga. 76 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 9, 1967

In Johnson v. … . *81 Hall v. State, 133 Ga. 177 (3) ( 65 SE 400 ); Franklin v. State, 146 Ga. 40 ( 90 SE 480 ); White v. State, 147 Ga. 377 (5) ( 94 SE 222 ); Surles v. State, 148 Ga. 537 (7) ( 97 SE 538 ); Kelly v.

Brown v. State

173 Miss. 542 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1935

The appellants cite Collins v. State, 100 Miss. 435 , 56 So. 527 ; Butler v. State, 146 Miss. 505 , 112 So. 685 , and Fisher v. State, 145 Miss. 116 , 110 So. 361 . … Hays v. State, 96 Miss. 153 , 50 So. 557 ; McFarland v. State, 110 Miss. 482 , 70 So. 563 . 9.

Brown v. State

42 Tex. Crim. 417 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 1901

In Weatherford v. … See Ware v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 521; McConnell v. State, 25 Texas Crim. App., 329; Floyd v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 341; Rutherford v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 92.

Lawrence v. . Brown

5 N.Y. 394 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1851

In Lawrence v. Miller ( 2 N. … (Ni ckells v. Atherstone, 10 Ad. & E. (N. S.) 944; Dodd v. Acklom, 6 Man. & Gr. 673, 679.)

Brown v. State

70 Ind. 576 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1880

Brown, was the wife of John Brown, named in the indictment, and she had been his wife for a number of years prior to his death, lie was about fifty-two years old when he was killed, and his wife, the appellant, was about … In the recent case of Guetig v.

State v. Brown

273 Conn. 330 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Apr 12, 2005

State v. King, supra, 249 Conn. 678 ; accord State v. … In State v.

Walker v. Brown

43 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1914

Brown, was valid. … Jefferson v. Winkler, 26 Okla. 653, 110 Pac. 755 ; Kirkpatrick v. Burgess, 29 Okla. 121 , 116 Pac. 764 ; Wilson v. Morton et al., 29 Okla. 745 , 119 Pac. 213 .

Brown v. State

81 Miss. 143 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1902

In Webb v. … To the same effect are the following cases: Houston v. State, 38 Ga., 165 ; State v. Rand, 33 N. H., at p. 227; Markham v. State, 25 Ga., 52 . Counsel misconceives James v. State, 77 Miss., 372 ; 26 So., 929 ; 78 Am.

Brown v. Matheson

142 Ga. 396 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 18, 1914

Co. v. Bittick & Mays, 142 Ga. 191 ( 82 S. E. 548 ). 2.

People v. Brown

925 N.W.2d 845 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2019

Brown v. . Williams

196 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1928

Miller v. Lash, 85 N. C., 51 ; Laurence v. Hester, 93 N. C., 79 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 ; Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 ; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312 ; Fertilizer Co. v. Eason, 194 N. C., 244 . 2. … Bailey v. Rutjes, 86 N. C., at p. 520-1; Blount v. Guthrie, 99 N. C., 93 ; Dorsett v. Dorsett, 183 N. C., 354 . See Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., at p. 397; Dorsey v. Corbett, 190 N. C., at p. 788.

Brown v. State

458 S.W.2d 192 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 8, 1970

The judgment making final the judgment nisi entered in Cause No. 3079 in the 31st District Court of Wheeler County, and adjudging that the State of Texas recover from the principal, William Robert Brown, and in like manner … United Bonding Insurance Company, as surety, the sum of $10,000.00 and all costs of suit; that *193 the execution issue and that the judgment draw interest at the rate of six percent from date, for the reasons set forth in Brown