Case law

Brown v. Rowe

96 Fla. 289 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 19, 1928

Bank of America v. Rowe, judge, filed herewith. … J., and Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, •T. J., concur.

State v. Brown

528 A.2d 1098 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jul 17, 1987

State v. Brown, 522 A.2d 208, 210 (R.I. 1987). On appeal we shall give great deference to the trial justice’s decision and will not disturb it unless it is clearly wrong. State v. … State v. Nicoletti, 471 A.2d 613, 618 (R.I. 1984); Leonardo v. State, 444 A.2d 876, 878 (R.I. 1982). Brown, in this case, was not afforded the opportunity to speak before the pronouncement of sentence.

Jordan v. Brown

71 Iowa 421 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 15, 1887

Garretson v. Hays, 70 Iowa, 19 . In Morrow v. Small, 33 Iowa, 118 , the petition was entitled in the caption, “In the circuit court.” … In Morrow v. Weed, 4 Iowa, 89 , it is said: “ What gives jurisdiction? The answer is — First, the law; second, a petition, (or what stands in its place.) ” In Smith v.

People v. Brown

924 N.W.2d 552 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2019

Brown v. State

135 Fla. 90 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 18, 1938

See Ward v. State, 83 Fla. 311 , 91 So. 189 ; Yarborough v. State, 94 Fla. 143 , 114 So. 237 ; Jacques v. State, 86 Fla. 137 , 97 So. 380 ; Hall v. State, 70 Fla. 48 , 69 So. 692 ; Maddox v. … Brown, in fact says that he, the said Jack C. Brown, and the said Jack C.

May v. Brown

144 Tex. 350 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1945

Brown as proponent. … In McElroy v.

Nail v. . Brown

150 N.C. 533 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1909

Brown, J. … Horne v. Power Co., 141 N. C., 50 ; Phillips v. Iron Works, 146 N. C., 217 ; Young v. Construction Co., 109 N. C., 618 ; Harley v. Car Co., 142 N. Y., 31 ; O’Neal v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

200 A.3d 943 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2019

Yates v. Brown

275 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1969

In Sykes v. … Davidson v. Powell was not cited in either Medlin v. Miles or Evans v. Freeman. While the language of the indorsement in Medlin v. Miles and in Evans v.

Brown v. Henderson

285 Mass. 192 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 12, 1934

Brown, then the presumption controls. When evidence is introduced then you are to consider the evidence. … Bagnell v. Boston Elevated Railway, 247 Mass. 235, 238 . Ferris v. Ray Taxi Service Co. 259 Mass. 401 . Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway, 269 Mass. 420, 424 . Mahoney v.

Lublin v. Brown

168 Conn. 212 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 25, 1975

Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. *223 563, 573 [ 30 S. Ct. 578 , 54 L. Ed. 883 ].’ ... … Kellems v. Brown, 163 Conn. 478, 490 , 313 A.2d 53 .

Norris v. Brown

154 S.C. 138 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 16, 1930

State v. Brown

26 Wash. 2d 857 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1947

Brown and Johnson are appellants in the present proceeding. … State v. Currie; 200 Wash. 699 , 94 P. (2d) 754 ; State v. Nelson, 6 Wn. (2d) 190, 107 P. (2d) 1113 ; State v. Hampson, 9 Wn. (2d) 278, 114 P. (2d) 992 ; State v. Conners, 12 Wn. (2d) 128, 120 P. *863 (2d) 1002.

Brown v. State

228 Ga. 215 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 7, 1971

State, supra; Flanagan v. State, 103 Ga. 619 ( 30 SE 550 ); Taylor v. State, 105 Ga. 746 ( 31 SE 764 ); Allams v. State, 123 Ga. 500 ( 51 SE 506 ); Rozier v. … Mars v. State, 163 Ga. 43 ( 135 SE 410 ); McKinnon v. State, 51 Ga. App. 549 ( 181 SE 91 ); Choice v. State, 31 Ga. 424, 478 ; Hill v. State, 64 Ga. 453 (3a).’ See also Mullins v.

Sandoval v. Brown

66 N.M. 235 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1959

McMinn v. Thompson, supra, holds nothing more nor less than that under the rule of Williams v. Haas, supra, and Curtis v. … The case of Terry v.

Vetzel v. Brown

86 So. 2d 138 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 2, 1956

VETZEL and Florence Vetzel, his wife, Appellants, v. Howell L. BROWN, Marjorie D. Brown, his wife, Melvin R. Wilson, Ermal L. Wilson, his wife, Robert W. Christy, Connie W. Christy, his wife, Harold A. … .; Oosterhouse v. Brummel, 1955, 343 Mich. 283 , 72 N.W.2d 6 ; Maxwell v. Smith, 1955, S.C. 89 S.E.2d 280 ; Bullock v. Steinmil Realty, 1 Misc.2d 46 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 331 ; O'Neil v.

Brown v. State

121 Tex. Crim. 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 27, 1932

See, also, Blake v. State, 3 Texas App., 581; Gose v. State, 6 Texas App., 121; McClendon v. State, 101 Texas Crim. Rep., 128 , 274 S. W., 159 ; Chastain v. State, 97 Texas Crim. Rep., 182 , 260 S. W., 172 . … See Jarman v. State, 112 Texas Crim. Rep., 239 , 16 S. W. (2d) 130 ; Arcos v. State, 120 Texas Crim. Rep., 315 , 29 S. W. (2d) 395 .

Williams v. Brown

2 Keyes 486 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1866

Hunt v. O’Connor and others, not reported; -Rose v. … It was to meet this precise contingency that section 112 was enacted; and, accordingly, in Beckwith v.

Brown v. Wyman

56 Iowa 452 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 18, 1881

Brown v. Owen

94 Ind. 31 · Indiana Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1884

See Paxton v. Dye, 26 Ind. 393 ; Fogleman v. State, 32 Ind. 145 . Finding no available error in the record the judgment is affirmed, with costs.