Case law

Brown v. State

40 Tex. Crim. 48 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1898

People v. Brown

53 N.Y.2d 979 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1981

While it is true, as both the majority and dissent below agreed, that driving while impaired is a lesser included offense of driving while intoxicated (see People v Hoag, 51 NY2d 632 ), this defendant was not prejudiced by … A lesser included offense is one which must by definition be concomitantly committed in the commission of the greater offense (CPL 1.20, subd 37; see People v Cruz, 48 NY2d 419 ).

Brown v. Runals

14 Wis. 693 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1861

Brown v. Mossop

139 Ohio St. 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1941

Appellant, Catherine Brown, is the widow of Jesse B. Brown, who died in November of 1931. … See Meyer v. Brinsky, 120 Ohio St., 371 , 195 N. E., 702 .

Brown v. State

232 Ind. 227 · Indiana Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1953

Epperson v. State (1937), 211 Ind. 237 , 6 N. E. 2d 538 ; Thompson v. State (1939), 215 Ind. 129 , 19 N. E. 2d 165 ; Sweet v. State (1941), 218 Ind. 182 , 31 N. E. 2d 993 ; State v. … R. 195; State v. Higgs (1930), 325 Mo. 704 , 29 S. W. 2d 74 ; State v. Andre (1938), 195 Wash. 221 , 80 P. 2d 553 ; Norris v. State (1939), 68 Okl. Cr. 172, 96 P. 2d 540 ; Wheatley v.

Reid v. Brown

56 N.M. 65 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1952

State v. Jones, 39 N.M. 395 , 48 P.2d 403 ; Clower v. Grossman, 55 N.M. 546 , 237 P.2d 353 . … State v. Riley, 32 N.M. 83 , 251 P. 384 .

Caldwell v. Brown

925 N.W.2d 868 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2019

Brown v. Keller

32 Ill. 151 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1863

Rowe v. Brown

157 Vt. 373 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Aug 9, 1991

The complaint alleged that plaintiff was excluded from meetings of the Ludlow Board of Selectmen, the Planning Board, *375 and the Board of Adjustment in 1984 and 1985. … Plaintiff named town manager and zoning administrator Brown and selectman VanGuilder as defendants, alleging that they “willfully or maliciously and under color of state law” requested, the Planning Board and Board of Adjustment

Brown v. Budd

2 Ind. 442 · Indiana Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1851

We are not satisfied, from the evidence, that notice of Budd's equity was given to any one at that sale; (see Foust v. … Caldwell v. Williams et al. in this Court (2) . R. Crawford, for the plaintiffs. H. P. Thornton, for the defendants. Per Curiam. The decree is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c. (3.) See ante, p. 17.

Brown v. State

565 So. 2d 304 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 22, 1990

Several of Brown's arguments merit little discussion. In Alvord v. … Brown requested an instruction on the jury's role based on Caldwell v.

Brown v. State

59 Wis. 2d 200 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1973

Kanieski v. … In Flowers v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

205 A.3d 316 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2019

Robinson v. Brown

182 Mass. 266 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 24, 1902

Townsend, 13 Met. 297 , 299; Brainard v. Connecticut River Railroad, 7 Cush. 506 , 510; Smith v. Dedham, 8 Cush. *268 522 , 524; Blood v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad, 2 Gray, 137; Brightman v. … See also Ricket v. Metropolitan Railway, L. R. 2 H. L. 175, 188,199. In Stetson v.

Brown v. Briggs

134 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1930

Brown advised defendant Charles A. … Brown and Nita Brown, his wife, entered into a written contract with defendants Charles A.

McDonald v. Brown

16 Ill. 32 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1854

President and Select men of the Town of Natches, 1 Smedes and Marshall, 46 ; Morrison et al. v. Rogers, 2 Scam. 318 ; 1 Chit. Pl. 100-1,107, and note 4; Jones v. Hoar, 5 Pick. 290 ; Lightly v. … Clanston, 1 Tenn. 112 ; Cummings and Wife v. Noyes, 10 Mass. 435 .

Moseley v. Brown

76 Va. 419 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Apr 20, 1882

Browning v. Morris, Cowp. 790; Briggs v. Thompson, 20 Johns. 294 ; Thomas v. Shoemaker, 6 Watts & Serg. 183 . … Brown v. Toell’s Adm’r, 5 Rand. 543 ; Rankin’s Ex’or v. Rankin’s Adm’r, 1 Gratt. 157 ; Parker v. Cousins, 2 Gratt. 373 ; Clarkson’s Adm’r v. Garland, 1 Leigh, 147 ; Spengler v.

Brown v. State

577 N.E.2d 221 · Indiana Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1991

Any later statement by Brown is not necessarily tainted by prior inadmissible statements to Schockweiler. Abner v. … Brown contends the trial court erred in admitting the videotape. Lamar v.

State v. Brown

312 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

State v. Sneeden, 274 N.C. 498 , 164 S.E. 2d 190 (1968); State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697 , 41 S.E. 789 (1902). … State v. Moore, 311 N.C. 442, 463 , 319 S.E. 2d 150, 158 (1984) (Meyer, J., concurring). See also State v.

Brown v. . Snell

57 N.Y. 286 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1874

In Salisbury v. … Justice BRONSON, delivering the opinion of the court, said the case could not be distinguished from Stillwell v.