Case law

Brown v. Griffith

70 Cal. 14 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1886

Canfield v. Thompson, 49 Cal. 210 , was decided on facts occurring before section 1951 was adopted.

People v. Brown

113 Cal. 35 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1896

(Ex parte Rosenheim, 83 Cal. 388 ; People v. Hamberg, 84 Cal. 475 ; Lowrey v. Hogue, 85 Cal. 602 .)

State v. Brown

462 Md. 555 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 4, 2019

State v. Brown

2019 Ohio 2688 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2019

Howland v. Brown

92 Ga. 513 · Supreme Court of Georgia · May 29, 1893

Brown v. State

38 Tex. 482 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

(Villareal v. The State, 26 Texas, 107 ; and 23 Texas, 557 ; 27 Texas, 146, 438 , 765 ; 28 Texas, 711 ; 29 Texas, 500 ; 31 Texas, 608, 575 ; 30 Texas, 472 ; 33 Texas, 660 .)

Brown v. State

138 Ga. 814 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 13, 1912

Reg. v. Mayers, 12 Cox’s Crim. Cases, 311; Reg. v. Young, 14 Ib. 114; Harvey v. State, 53 Ark. 425 ( 14 S. W. 645 , 22 Am. St. R. 229 ); Maupin v. State (Ark.), 14 S. W. 924 ; Malone v. Com., 91 Ky. 307 ( 15 S. … W. 856 ); Payne v. State, 40 Tex. Cr. 202 ( 49 S. W. 604 , 76 Am. St. R. 712 ); State v. Shroyer, 104 Mo. 441 ( 16 S. W. 286 , 24 Am. St. R. 344 ); State v. Welch, 191 Mo. 179 ( 89 S. W. 945 ). In Gore v.

Brown v. Guyer

437 P.3d 111 · Montana Supreme Court · Feb 5, 2019

Brown v. Owen

75 Miss. 319 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1897

Gotor v. Commissioners, 1 Bay., 354; Singleton v. Commissioners, 2 Bay., 205. … Morley v. Power, 5 Lea (Tenn.), 696.

Brown v. State

73 Ga. 38 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 4, 1884

USAA v. Brown

Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 25, 2020

§ Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v … § § HARRY BROWN, § C.A. No.

Taney v. Brown

262 N.C. 438 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1964

Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271 , 128 S.E. 2d 590 ; Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101 , 97 S.E. 2d 486 ; James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102 , 86 S.E. 2d 759 . … Goldsboro v. R. R., supra; G.S. 1-183; Clifton v. Turner, 257 N.C. 92 , 125 S.E. 2d 339 . This Court said in Raleigh v.

Brown v. Kimball

12 Vt. 617 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Aug 15, 1839

Steamboat Co. v. Wilkins, 8 Vt. R. 54. 1 Swift’s Dig. 682,683. Faxon v. Mansfield, 2 Mass. R. 147 . Cut *619 ter v. Powell, 6 T. R. 321. Jennings v. Camp. 13 Johns. R. 94. … Fenton v. Clark, 11 Vt. R. 557. This, however, could not aid the plaintiff in this case. The judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Brown v. State

72 Miss. 95 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1894

In the case of Rocco v. The State, 37 Miss., 357 , this question was supposed to have been definitely settled.

Ely v. Brown

183 Ill. 575 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1899

(Harding v. … (Ambrose v. Raley, 58 Ill. 506 ; Angeli on Limitations, sec. 390; Wright v. Stice, 173 Ill. 571 ; Shaw v. Schoonover, 130 id. 448).

Brown v. Rowe

96 Fla. 289 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 19, 1928

Bank of America v. Rowe, judge, filed herewith. … J., and Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, •T. J., concur.

Brown v. Wyncoop

2 Blackf. 230 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 8, 1829

State v. Brown

528 A.2d 1098 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jul 17, 1987

State v. Brown, 522 A.2d 208, 210 (R.I. 1987). On appeal we shall give great deference to the trial justice’s decision and will not disturb it unless it is clearly wrong. State v. … State v. Nicoletti, 471 A.2d 613, 618 (R.I. 1984); Leonardo v. State, 444 A.2d 876, 878 (R.I. 1982). Brown, in this case, was not afforded the opportunity to speak before the pronouncement of sentence.

Sims v. Brown

252 Mo. 58 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913

[Murphy v. Gabbert, 166 Mo. 596 ; Aldridge v. Aldridge, 202 Mo. 565 ; Givens v. Ott, 222 Mo. 395, 1 . c. 411; Terry v. Glover, 235 Mo. 544, 1 . c. 551-2.] … In Gaither v.

Brown v. Spencer

163 Cal. 589 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1912

The plaintiffs are Thomas Brown, David Brown, and Hochheimer & Co., a corporation. The transactions upon which the alleged trust arose occurred in 1901. At that time Hochheimer & Co., was a partnership. … (Campbell v. Freeman, 99 Cal 546, [ 34 Pac. 113 ] ; Hidden v. Jordan, 21 Cal. 99 ; Millard v. Hathaway, 27 Cal. 139 ; Sandfoss v. Jones, 35 Cal. 486 ; Walton v. Karnes, 67 Cal. 255 , [ 7 Pac. 676 ] ; Ward v.