Case law

Brown v. Commonwealth

214 Va. 755 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Apr 22, 1974

Branzburg v. … E.g., Branzburg v. Hayes, supra, 408 U.S. at 690 .

Brown v. State

155 Tex. Crim. 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1950

C., Sec. 1682; Price v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 208 , *234 194 S. W. 827 ; Eubank v. State, 115 Tex. Cr. R. 112 , 28 S. W. 2d 808 ; Reid v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 34 , 133 S. W. 2d 979 . … I arrested Louis Brown around eleven o’clock. He came to the jail around eleven, and surrendered to me.” Neither the gauge of the gun nor the size of the shots are shown.

State v. Brown

238 N.J. 369 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 2019

Woodward v. Brown

119 Cal. 283 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1897

On that day the title still remained in Brown. The Dorn deed was recorded January 23d, while'the John Brown Colony deed was recorded January 26th. … But it does not apply to the John Brown Colony deed as respects the other blocks and lots conveyed to that corporation.

Weill v. Brown

197 Ga. 328 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 6, 1944

Farmers Merchants Bank , 163 Ga. 352 ( 136 S.E. 143 ); Pepsi-Cola Co. v. Wright , 187 Ga. 723 ( 2 S.E.2d 73 ). We have examined the cases of Brown v. Floding , 173 Ga. 400 ( 160 S.E. 604 ), Webb v. Pullman Co. , 57 Ga. … App. 776 ( 196 S.E. 477 ), and Brown v. Bowman , 119 Ga. 153 ( 46 S.E. 410 ), cited by the plaintiffs in error, and find nothing in them in conflict with the rulings here made.

Brown v. Bailey

215 S.C. 175 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 2, 1949

Virginia Brown, was employed by Simmons some time later. She was also a high school grad *181 uate and then in her early twenties. … Stoddard v.

State v. Brown

263 Mont. 223 · Montana Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1994

Brown (Brown) pled guilty to one count each of felony criminal endangerment, negligent homicide and obstructing justice. … In an analogous situation in State v.

State v. Brown

312 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

State v. Sneeden, 274 N.C. 498 , 164 S.E. 2d 190 (1968); State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697 , 41 S.E. 789 (1902). … State v. Moore, 311 N.C. 442, 463 , 319 S.E. 2d 150, 158 (1984) (Meyer, J., concurring). See also State v.

Brown v. . Snell

57 N.Y. 286 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1874

In Salisbury v. … Justice BRONSON, delivering the opinion of the court, said the case could not be distinguished from Stillwell v.

Brown v. Gilpin

75 Kan. 773 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 11, 1907

On April 1, 1905, Wright did execute in Gilpin’s behalf a contract for the sale of the land to Brown. … Wright, agent, agrees to deliver to said Archy Brown or his assigns a good and sufficient *778 warranty deed for the above-described real estate, provided and upon the condition that the said Archy Brown or his assigns shall

Brown v. Harris

20 Ga. 403 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1856

In our opinion, “ a mere substitution by the plaintiff of Rogers & Meara as debtor, in the place of Brown & Harris,” would, of itself have abrogated the debt as to Brown & Harris. … The cause of action which that testimony proved, was &>. contract of Brown & Harris made with Isaac C. Harris, as¡ the agent of some one, whom the testimony did not show..

Brown v. Rouse

104 Cal. 672 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1894

(Brown v. Rouse, 93 Cal. 237 .) The original complaint alleged these facts: On November 18, 1887, the defendant, Charlotte Bouse, a married woman, by her alleged attorney in fact, G. M. … (Brown v. Rouse, 93 Cal. 287 .)

State v. Brown

185 La. 1023 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 30, 1936

State v. Norphlis, supra. In State v. … But the indictment further says that “the said Clarence Brown (the defendant) has been a fugitive from justice since the commission of said crime.”

Brown v. People

158 Colo. 561 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Dec 13, 1965

Brown was convicted on both counts and his codefendant, Glymph, was convicted on the first count only. Each was sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary. … Evans v. U. S., 242 F.2d 534 ; Rettich, et al. v. U. S., 84 F.2d 118 ; Benton v. U. S., 70 F.2d 24 ; Rose v. U. S., 274 Fed. 245 . The holding in the Evans case, supra, is based on Fed. R. Crim.

Brown v. . Hale

93 N.C. 188 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1885

Simonton v. Lanier, 71 N. C., 498 ; Bank v. Foote, 77 N. C., 131 ; Foley v. Blank, 92 N. C., 476 ; Kerehner v. Baker, 82 N. C., 169 ; Norwood v. King, 86 N. C., 80 . There is no errer, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Brown v. Cairns

63 Kan. 584 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 9, 1901

(Bohart v. Investment Co., 49 Kan. 94 , 30 Pac. 180 ; Chambers v. Anderson, 51 id. 385, 32 Pac. 1098 .) … (Brown v. Cairns, 65 Pac. [Kan.] 231.)

Huber v. Brown

57 Wash. 654 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1910

A like question was made in Hamilton v. Witner, 50 Wash. 689 , 97 Pac. 1084 , 126 Am. St. 921, and in Lara v. Sandell, 52 Wash. 53 , 100 Pac. 166 . … The precise question was raised in Cordiner v. Dear, 55 Wash. 479, 104 Pac. 780 .

Brown v. Luehrs

79 Ill. 575 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

Moeller & Busch testified that the money left their office the next morning, was sent to Brown, but could not say that it reached' him. Brown testified that he never received the money. … and pay it to Brown, and take his receipt; that witness took the blank receipt book of the firm of Moeller.-& Busch, filled out the receipt ready for signing, and took the money and receipt book to Brown,' gave the money

Meyer v. Brown

130 Mich. 449 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 8, 1902

This testimony was given for the purpose of showing that the wood was dry at the time it was put on board the car at Mantón. … Ev. 16th Ed. § 120a, and cases cited; Lassone v. Boston & Lowell Railroad, 66 N. H. 345 ( 24 Atl. 902 , 17 L. R. A. 525). Other questions are raised, but we consider them unimportant. The judgment is affirmed.

Knight v. Brown

25 W. Va. 808 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1885

Knight against William Brown in the circuit court of Mason county. There was a trial by jury, and on September 19, 1882, a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff from which the defendant obtained this writ of error. … referred to, the declaration must be regarded as containing this averment, and therefore sufficient; But if this inference is not correct, the declaration must be held sufficient under the decision of this Court in Gillison v.