Case law

Holland v. . Brown

140 N.Y. 344 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1893

(Cook v. Travis, 20 N. Y. 400 : Brown v. Valkenburg, 64 id. 76: Pope v. Allen, 90 id. 298.) … (Trustees, etc., Town of East Hampton v. Kirk, 84 N. Y. 220 ; Jackson v. Halstead, 5 Cowen, 216; Baker v. Van Valkenburgh, 29 Barb. 319 .)

Brown v. Woody

64 Mo. 547 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1877

Brown, deceased, the dower having been heretofore assigned by the order and judgment of this court on the agreement of parties in interest, and said cause continued as to the damages claimed by said Jane Brown, and the said … Brown, deceased, and that the messuages described in the petition were the homestead of said John D. Brown, deceased, in possession ; that the said John D.

Brown v. Johnson

45 Cal. 76 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Williams v. Brown

14 Ill. 200 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1852

The bill avers that the complainant advanced to the defendant Brown fifty dollars, with which to purchase the premises in question for him, and that Brown undertook the trust. … Such were the cases of Boyd v. McLean, 1 Johns. C. R. 582; and Coats v. Wood-worth, 13 Illinois, 654.

People v. Brown

2020 IL 125203 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 19, 2020

People v. Artis, 232 Ill. 2d 156, 164 (2009). … People v. McKown, 236 Ill. 2d 278, 310 (2010).

State v. Brown

247 Mo. 715 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1913

[State v. Taylor, 134 Mo. l. c. 155.] … [Brown v. People, 17 Mich. l. c. 435.]

Carey v. Brown

58 Cal. 180 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1881

(Newcomb v. Horton, 18 Wisc. 566.) … (Bonds v. Hickman, 29 Cal. 460 .)

Davis v. Brown

46 W. Va. 716 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1899

Banking Co, v. Board of Comers of Finney Co. (C. … Howland v. Board, 109 Cal. 152 , ( 41 Pac. 864 ). In Gillespie v.

State v. Brown

16 Conn. 54 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 15, 1843

The King v. Bear, 2 Salk. 646. The King v. Davis, 1 Show. 336. The King v. Bowden, 1 Levinz, 9. Hannibal v. Spaulding, 1 Root, 86 . … Calcraft v. Gibbs, 5 Term Rep. 19. The King v. Francis, 2 Term Rep. 484. Lord Selsea v. Powell, 6 Taun. 297.

Wilson v. Brown

269 Pa. 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1920

Railroad, 195 Pa. 91 ; Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co., 259 Pa. 510 ; Passmore v. Allentown & Reading Traction Co., 267 Pa. 356 ; Kelly v. Thomas, 234 Pa. 419 . … It is admitted that if this complainant went before the board of directors, they would refuse to act.

Brown v. Fraley

222 Md. 480 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 29, 1960

The following cases support this statement of the law: Tichnor Bros. v. Evans, 92 Vt. 278, 102 A. 1031 ; Mark v. Stuart-Howland Co., 226 Mass. 35 , 115 N. E. 42 ; Springfield Seed Co. v. Walt, 94 Mo. App. 76 , 67 S. … Slice v. Carozza, 215 Md. 357 , 137 A. 2d 687 . The contract of sale and the bill of sale together constituted one agreement and should be construed together. Ahern v. White, 39 Md. 409 ; Ray v.

Brown v. West

70 Ga. 201 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 17, 1883

State v. Brown

75 Mo. 317 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

S. 1879, § 1309; State v. Ramelsburg, 30 Mo. 26 . … State v. Kelly, 73 Mo. 608 , and cases cited. No evidence having been preserved, and nothing to show that good character was established, the instruction was, doubtless, broad enough.

Bastajian v. Brown

19 Cal. 2d 209 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1941

Comstock v. James E. Brown, et al. … Brown was his client and I was employed to try the case for Spalding. I do not know where Brown is and you know Spalding has been dead several months. I have no file.

Brown v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 535 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1958

Moynahan v. State, 140 Texas Cr. Rep. 540 , 146 S.W. 2d 376 ; Gonzales v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 108 , 261 S.W. 2d 577 ; Womack v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 237 , 268 S.W. 2d 140 ; Caka v.

Brown v. Mitchell

87 Tex. 140 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1894

BROWN, Associate Justice. The following questions are certified in this case: “ 1. … Brown v. Mitchell, 75 Texas, 15 . If the evidence showed that the witnesses were cognizant of the facts upon which the opinions were based, the evidence was admissible. Delivered June 7, 1894.

Brown v. Anderson

90 Ind. 93 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

Brownfield v. Weicht, 9 Ind. 394 ; Ragan v. Haynes, 10 Ind. 348 ; Godfrey v. Godfrey, 17 Ind. 6 ; Houk v. Barthold, 73 Ind. 21 ; Wilcox v. Moudy, 82 Ind.219. … Eggleston v. Castle, 42 Ind. 531 ; Kirkland v. State, 43 Ind. 146 (13 Am. R. 386); Brooks v. Allen, 62 Ind. 401 .

Nelson v. Brown

140 Mo. 580 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897

Y. 353 ; George v. Andrews, 60 Md. 26 ; Calvo v. Davis, 73 N. Y. 211 ; Fish v. Hayward, 28 Hun. (N. Y.) 456; Murray v. Marshall, 94 N. Y. 611 ; Union Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hanford, 143 U. S. 187 ; Metz v. … Todd, 36 Mich. 473 ; Remsen v. Beekman, 25 N. Y. 552 ; Hurd v. Callahan, 9 Abb. N. C. (N. Y.) 374; Jester v. Sterling, 25 Hun. 344 ; Paine v. Jones, 14 Hun. 577 ; King v. Baldwin, 2 Johns. Ch. 559 .

Brown v. Rickets

4 Johns. Ch. 303 · New York Court of Chancery · Jan 27, 1820

I have had occasion frequently to lay down this rule; (Dunscomb v. Dunscomb, Manning v. Manning, and Schiefflin v. Stewart, 1 Johns. Ch. … In Newton v.

Brown v. Woodbury

5 Ind. 254 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1854

Brown’s answer is sworn to. … Brown set up in avoidance as to part certain matters of payment.'