Case law

Brown v. State

126 Tex. Crim. 449 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1934

Clifford and Gilliland followed the parties for. some distance until they reached a gate going into the Brown pasture. … In support of the text many authorities are cited, among them being Ward v. State, 10 Texas App., 297; Goode v. State, 120. S. W., 199; Green v. State, 34 S. W., 283 . . The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

LaFleur v. Brown

223 La. 976 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 3, 1953

And in the case of Illinois Central Railroad v. … Greeson Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp., 219 La. 1006 , 54 So.2d 528 .

Brown v. State

203 Md. 126 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 11, 2001

State, 174 Md. 195, 201; Cohen v. State, 179 Md. 696 (unreported); 16 A. 2d 878 , and Lubinski v. State, 180 Md. 1, 9 . … He contends that the court’s statement that “Brown said he made that statement and took that position in order to protect his wife” was inaccurate because Brown never admitted that he told Sergeant Klump that Exhibit 3 was

People v. Brown

72 Cal. 390 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1887

This matter was discussed in the case of People v. Hamilton, 62 Cal. 377 . The precise point here made was, perhaps, not involved in that case, but we are satisfied with the reasoning upon this subject in that opinion.

Ide v. . Brown

178 N.Y. 26 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1904

A guardian is not entitled to the services or society of his ward, and ordinarily, he has no power to make a contract binding upon the person or property of the ward unless authorized by a statute. ( Wuesthoff v. … (See Andrus v. Blazzard, 54 L.R.A. 354 ; Copley v. O'Niel, 57 Barb. 299 ; Warren v.

Brown v. Marsh

7 Vt. 320 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 15, 1835

Brown v. State

59 Wash. 195 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1910

State v. Brown, *196 37 Wash. 106 , 79 Pac. 638 , 117 Am. St. 798, 68 L. R. A. 889. … Smith v. Board of Dental Examiners, 31 Wash. 492 , 72 Pac. 110 ; In re Thompson, 36 Wash. 377 , 78 Pac. 899 ; State v. Brown, supra; State v. Sexton, 37 Wash. 110 , 79 Pac. 634 ; State v.

Zukowsky v. Brown

79 Wash. 2d 586 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1971

Zukowsky v. Brown, 1 Wn. App. 94 , 459 P.2d 964 (1969). We granted defendants’ petition for review which challenges' two of the conclusions of the Court of Appeals. … Ct. 406 (1959): We hold that the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each

State v. Brown

287 Ga. 473 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 5, 2010

rights, see Miranda v. … See, e.g., McGowan v.

Brown v. State

105 Ind. 385 · Indiana Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1886

Jarrell v. State, 58 Ind. 293 ; Stout v. State, 90 Ind. 1 . The instruction is subject to criticism in other particulars. … Epps v. State, 102 Ind. 539 . On behalf of the defendant, ten instructions were presented and refused by the court.

Caldwell v. Brown

53 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1867

In Gilman v. … In Albro v.

People v. Brown

273 Ill. 169 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1916

Maguire v. People, 219 Ill. 16 ; McCann v. People, 226 id. 562. … There was a large number of these receipts for beer shipped to Moses Brown, M. Brown, the Moses Brown Express Company, or Moses Brown, care of Moses Brown Express Company.

Brown v. State

76 Ga. 623 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 30, 1886

People v. Brown

76 Cal. 573 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888

Objection was made to this question, the objection was overruled, and the defendant answered, “ No, sir; I did not.” ' Conceding that the last question was improperly allowed, under the authority of People v.

Brown v. Barnes

39 Mich. 211 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1878

As we had occasion to review the doctrine concerning such repetitions in Leonard v. Pope, 27 Mich., 145 , we need not discuss it here. … A similar inquiry was presented in Threadgool v. Litogot, 22 Mich., 271 , but it was not necessary to consider it fully.

People v. Brown

45 Cal. 2d 640 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1955

United States, 285 F. 1, 2 ; State v. Wills, 91 W.Va. 659 [ 114 S.E. 261, 264 , 24 A.L.R. 1398 ]; Haynes v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. 553 [ 9 S.W.2d 1043 ]; State v. Jokosh, 181 Wis. 160 [ 193 N.W. 976, 977 ]; see Taylor v. … (Johnson v. United States, supra, 333 U.S. 10, 16-17 ; United States v. Di Re, supra, 332 U.S. 581, 595 ; Lustig v. United States, 338 U.S. 74, 80 [ 69 S.Ct. 1372 , 93 L.Ed. 1819 ] ; Byars v.

State v. Brown

33 N.M. 98 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1927

It was made to appear that at about noon on the day in question an inspector of the cattle sanitary board called at appellant’s ranch home, some distance from Silver City, and without exhibiting a warrant, and being armed … As most nearly in point of the decisions we have examined, the following are mentioned: Myers v. State, 115 Ind. 554 , 18 N. E. 42 ; Clay v. State, 82 Fla. 83 , 89 So. 353 ; People v. Byzon, 267 Ill. 498 , 108 N.

Brown v. Jenks

98 Cal. 10 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1893

Brown v. Jensen

41 Cal. 2d 193 · California Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1953

Bank v. Chapman, 31 Cal.App.2d 182 [ 87 P.2d 724 ] ; Hellman Com. T. & S. Bank v. Maurice, 105 Cal.App. *196 653 [ 288 P. 683 ] ; Ferry v. Fisk, 54 Cal.App. 763 [ 202 P. 964 ] ; Crescent Lumber Co. v. … Plaintiff relies on Hillen v.

Brown v. Clark

80 Conn. 419 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 5, 1908

Haussman v. Burnham, 59 Conn. 117, 133 , 22 Atl. 1065 ; Belden v. Sedgwick, 68 Conn. 560, 564 , 37 Atl. 417 . … Fuller v. Metropolitan L. I. Co., 68 Conn. 55, 65 , 35 Atl. 766 . The report of commissioners upon an intestate insolvent estate is not such a final judgment. Bailey v.