Case law

Brown v. Clark

80 Conn. 419 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 5, 1908

Haussman v. Burnham, 59 Conn. 117, 133 , 22 Atl. 1065 ; Belden v. Sedgwick, 68 Conn. 560, 564 , 37 Atl. 417 . … Fuller v. Metropolitan L. I. Co., 68 Conn. 55, 65 , 35 Atl. 766 . The report of commissioners upon an intestate insolvent estate is not such a final judgment. Bailey v.

State v. Brown

410 So. 2d 1043 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 1, 1982

410 So.2d 1043 (1982) STATE of Louisiana v. Leroy BROWN. No. 81-KA-0703. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 1, 1982. *1044 William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. … DIXON, Chief Justice. [*] Defendant Leroy Brown was convicted of burglary (R.S. 14:62) of a business in Baton Rouge, Louisiana by a jury on December 3, 1980. He appeals his conviction and sentence of twelve years.

Brown v. Williams

504 So. 2d 1188 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1987

BROWN, Mrs. Winona Brown, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and B.A. Jones Casing Crews, Inc. v. R.E. WILLIAMS, d/b/a R.E. Williams Drilling Company, P.E. Cochran, Phil E. … . *1192 In Toliver v.

State v. Brown

103 S.C. 437 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 3, 1916

The respondent claims that the proof of the corpus delicti is a question of fact, and is for the jury, and this Court cannot consider the question, and cites State v. Martin, 47 S. C. 67, 25 S. E. 113 , as authority. … In the case at bar the dogs wanted to enter the premises of Adam Brown, and were not permitted to do so.

Brown v. Kistleman

177 Ind. 692 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1912

Appellant filed her complaint against appellees, for damages growing out of personal injuries to her husband, Albert Brown. … Haynes v. Nowlin (1891), 129 Ind. 581, 584 , 29 N. E. 389 , 14 L. R. A. 787, 28 Am. St. 213; Wolf v. Wolf (1892), 130 Ind. 599 ; Holmes v. Holmes (1893), 133 Ind. 386 , 32 N. E. 932 ; Postlewaite v.

Brown v. Gerald

70 L.R.A. 472 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 29, 1905

Brown, 35 Mich. 333 , in an able and exhaustive opinion prepared by Judge Cooley, in which he analyzed nearly all the authorities. See South West Mo. Light Co. v. Scheurick, 174 Mo. 235 . When the case of Amoskeag Mfg. … Board of Health v. Van Hoesen, 87 Mich. 533 . The recent case of Fallsburg Power & Mfg. Co. v. Alexander, (Va.) 61 L. R.

State v. Brown

174 Neb. 387 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1962

State v. Wilson, ante p. 86, 115 N. W. 2d 794 . The defendants and Mary Brown were charged with robbery in one information. … United States v. Caron, 266 F. 2d 49 ; Costello v. United States, 255 F. 2d 389 .

Brown v. State

454 S.W.3d 226 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 2015

CR-14-472 MARLIN BROWN Opinion Delivered January 22, 2015 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. … Buckley v. State, 349 Ark. 53, 76 S.W.3d 825 (2002) (citing Wicks v. State, supra ). Anderson v. State, 353 Ark. 384, 395, 108 S.W.3d 592, 599 (2003).

Harhen v. Brown

431 Mass. 838 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 27, 2000

The Appeals Court reversed, Harhen v. Brown, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 793, 816 (1999), and we granted the defendants’ application for further appellate review. … Harhen v. Brown, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 793, 810 (1999).

Brown v. State

62 So. 2d 348 · Supreme Court of Florida · Dec 22, 1952

62 So.2d 348 (1952) BROWN et al. v. STATE. Supreme Court of Florida, Division A. December 22, 1952. Rehearing Denied January 20, 1953. Thacker & Thacker, Kissimmee, for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Atty. … Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699 , 68 S.Ct. 1229 , 92 L.Ed. 1663 ; Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 ; United States v.

Brown v. Fox

189 Va. 509 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jun 20, 1949

’ Crowder v. Haymaker, 164 Va. 77, 80 , 178 S. E. 803, 804 ; Epperson v. DeJarnette, 164 Va. 482, 486 , 180 S. E. 412 .” … In the case of Hiebert v. Howell, 59 Idaho 591 , 85 P. (2d) 699 , 120 A. L. R. 388, The Industrial Accident Board had awarded compensation for the death of David Hiebert.

People v. Brown

110 Mich. 168 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1896

People v. Hamilton, 76 Mich. 215 ; People v. Price, 74 Mich. 37 . 2.

Brown v. Solary

37 Fla. 102 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1896

Brown; that the tax deed to Tompkins was void on account of certain specified defects in the tax sale proceedings; and that defendants Brown, Agnew, Gillen, Baldwin, the-Marion Phosphate Company, and the Silver Springs, Ocala … It is also insisted that there is a misjoinder of parties, in this, that the defendants Brown, Agnew, Gillen, Baldwin, the Marion Phosphate Company, and the Silver Springs, Ocala & Gulf Railroad Company *115 are alleged,

Brown v. Campbell

100 Cal. 635 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1893

The attachment, at least in the second action of Priest v. Brown, was levied upon the entire interest of the judgment debtor in the land described in the trust deed. … (Buchanan v. Marsh, 17 Iowa, 494 ; Crim v. Walker, 79 Mo. 335 ; Claflin v. McDermott, 12 Fed. Rep. 375; Tarbell v. Griggs, 3 Paige, 207 ; 23 Am. Dec. 790 .) 3.

Brown v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1959

v. … v.

Gibson v. Brown

214 Ill. 330 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1905

(Seaver v. Hall, 50 Neb. 878 ; Hepburn v. Dunlop, i Wheat. 179; Hepburn v. Auld, 5 Cranch, 262 ; Dresel v. Jordan, 104 Mass. 407 ; Williamson v. Neeves, 94 Wis. 656 .) … In Mason v.

Freeman v. . Brown

151 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1909

C., 487 ; *114 Davis v. Thornburg, 149 N. C., 233 ; Griffin v. Railroad, 123 N. C., 55 ; Jennings v. Hinton, 128 N. C., 214 ; Collins v. Collins, 125 N. C., 98 . … Bryan v. Malloy, 90 N. C., 508 ; Stewart v. Register, 108 N. C., 588 ; Mabe v. Mabe, 122 N. C., 552 .

State v. . Brown

82 N.C. 585 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

State v. … State v. Wilson, Phil., 337.

Boyd v. Brown

192 Va. 702 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Sep 5, 1951

Roy Brown, an infant six years of age and forty-nine inches in height, lives in a section of Danville east of Worsham street. When he was struck he was on his way home from school. … Roy Brown testified but neither of his companions was called as a witness. The following extract from his evidence is the child’s explanation of the accident: “Q. Did you want to cross Worsham street? “A.

Brown v. Durham.

141 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1906

Hoice, J., after stating the case: The right of the plaintiff to recover on the facts set ont in the case on appeal is fully sustained by the principles announced in Bunch v. Edenton, 90 N. C., 431 , and Fitzgerald v. … Russell v. Railroad, 118 N. C., 1098 ; Ramsbottom v. Railroad, 138 N. C., 38 .