Case law

People v. Brown

52 Ill. 2d 94 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 26, 1972

The appellate court affirmed the conviction (People v. Brown, 131 Ill.App.2d 669 , 267 N.E.2d 142 ), and we granted the defendant’s petition for leave to appeal. … In Brady v.

Brown v. Illius

25 Conn. 583 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Feb 15, 1857

See Smith v. Adams, 6 Paige, 434 . Ch. J. … Parke, J., in the case of Dickerson v.

Ruberg v. Brown

50 S.C. 397 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Sep 24, 1897

Trumbo v. Finley, 18 S. C., 305. The case of Harvey v. Hackney, 35 S. … See Fraser v. Harvey, 2 Bailey, 270 ; Means v. Brickell, 2 Hill, 320 ; Rupart v. Dunn, 1 Rich., 105 ; Lebby v. Ahrens, 26 S. C., 282. In Rupart v.

Brown v. Weathers

251 S.C. 67 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 12, 1968

Simon v. Flowers, 231 S. C. 545, 99 S. E. (2d) 391 ; Holliday v. Holliday, 235 S. C. 246, 111 S. E. (2d) 205 . … Gaskins v. California Ins. Co., 195 S. C. 376, 11 S. E. (2d) 436 ; Savage v. Cannon, 204 S. C. 473, 30 S. E. (2d) 70 .

State v. Brown

122 N.M. 724 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1996

In State v. … See State v.

Erickson v. Brown

813 N.W.2d 531 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2012

See Erickson v. Brown (“Erickson I”), 2008 ND 57, ¶¶ 3-11 , 747 N.W.2d 34 . … See Hurt v.

Shewalter v. Brown

35 Miss. 423 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1858

The record contains none of the evidence adduced on the trial of the case, if any was offered; and it appears, that the allegation in the answer, that the collection was made under an assessment legally made by the Board … Code, 708, § 24; and this is done by fixing a certain rate per centum on the State tax, by order of the Board of Police. Ib. 716, Art. 20; Moore v. Foote, 32 Miss. 469 .

State v. Brown

214 La. 18 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 15, 1948

The defendant, Edward Brown, prosecutes this appeal from his conviction on an indictment charging him with the murder of Milton Hayes and his death sentence thereunder, presenting for our consideration nine bills of exceptions … See State v.

Brown v. State

252 Ind. 161 · Indiana Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1969

Brown, 50, of 844 Lincoln as the suspect in the case”. The article also quoted a Detective Captain as saying that “Brown will face preliminary murder charges tonite in City Court.” … The same conclusion may be made with reference to Estes v. State, supra, and Rubenstein v. State, supra. In the case of Irvin v.

Brown v. Hathaway

10 Minn. 303 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 15, 1865

Brown v. Fales

139 Mass. 21 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 27, 1885

Smith v. Faulkner, 12 Gray, 251 , 255. Eaton v. Smith, 20 Pick. 150 . Russell v. Lathrop, 117 Mass. 424, 426 . Shore v. Wilson, 9 Cl. & Fin. 355, 540, 542, 543, 565. 1 Chit. Con. (11th Am. ed.) 156. … Mansfield v. Edwards, 136 Mass. 15, 19 . And besides, no contract on the part of the defendant was implied, in addition to her express contract in writing, relating to the same subject matter. 1 Chit.

Brown v. Graham

58 Tex. 254 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1883

Brown v. Cobb

53 N.M. 169 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1949

Marchbanks v. McCullough, 47 N.M. 13 , 132 P.2d 426, 429 ; Flippo v. Martin, supra. In Marchbanks v. … Dove Brown, with whom Mrs. Smyth lived for awhile, testified that her mental condition steadily declined from the first attack in 1945. Mrs.

Brown v. State

92 Fla. 592 · Supreme Court of Florida · Aug 10, 1926

Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81 , 47 South. Rep. 487 ; Nichols v. State, 86 Fla. 208 , 98 South. Rep. 502 . … This Court in the case of Clay v. State, 82 Fla. 83 , 89 South. Rep. 353 , reaffirmed the rule as stated in the case of Pope v.

Brown v. Stevens

136 Mich. 311 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1904

This case in all its essential features is ruled by McCrum v. Weil & Co., 125 Mich. 297 ( 84 N. W. 282 ). See, also, Felton v. Schmidt, 104 Mich. 349 ( 62 N. W. 552 , 53 Am. St. Rep. 462 ); Neff v. … A. 500); Smith v. Wildes, 143 Mass. 556 ( 10 N. E. 446 ); Hendricken v. Meadows, 154 Mass. 601 ( 28 N. E. 1054 ). 2. The plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence unless he was warned of the danger.

Brown v. George

344 Pa. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1942

Justice Stern, In this action the statement of claim alleged that the wife plaintiff was in the act of boarding a streetcar when the motorman closed the doors prematurely, pinioning her between them. … A motion for judgment n. o. v. must be based upon pleadings and evidence and not upon arguments made by counsel to the jury: see Plummer v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co., 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 180, 184 .

Brown v. State

438 S.W.2d 926 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1969

See Burns v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 183 , 262 S.W.2d 406 . Malice can be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon. Rodriguez v. State, 375 S.W.2d 289 . In Brown v. … Hill v. State, 403 S.W.2d 797 ; Johnson v. State, 379 S.W.2d 329 ; Boyett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 769 . See 13A Texas Digest Criminal Law @^1120 (3); 5 Tex.Jur.2d 354, Sec. 209. The judgment is affirmed.

Duffy v. Brown

708 P.2d 433 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1985

Brown did not hold up to his agreement.” … Kinniburgh v.

Nelson v. . Brown

144 N.Y. 384 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1895

The question of the competency of adjudicating in foreclosure proceedings upon a dower right has been passed upon in the case of Merchants' Bank v. Thomson ( 55 N. Y. 7 ). … They contain a direct expression of intention and fall readily under the exception mentioned in the cases cited by the appellant of Lewis v. Smith ( 9 N. Y. 511 ), and Konvalinka v. Schlegel (104 id. 125).

Deveraux v. Brown

2 Utah 2d 334 · Utah Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1954