Case law

State v. Brown

7 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

(State of Oregon v. Dodson, 4 Or. 64 .) And we hold it to be good and sufficient in law. … (Shattuck v. Smith, 5 Or. 125 .)

Brown v. Chase

4 Mass. 436 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 15, 1808

Stewart v. Brown

2 Serg. & Rawle 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1816

Tenbrook v. Brown

17 Ind. 410 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1861

Tenbj'ook was one of the heirs and distributees, through his mother, of Samuel Brown, deceased, and the defendant, Brown, was a son of the deceased, and his executor. … McClay v. The State, 1 Ind. 385 . In this case, however, it does not appear from the record that any such verbal explanations or modifications were made.

Brown v. Bowen

90 Mo. 184 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Sherman and Speicberger Bros., and that plaintiff Brown had notice of said claims and agreement with Mrs. … Evid., sec. 284a; Rollins v. Claybrook, *190 22 Mo. 405 ; Moss v. Green, 41 Mo. 389 .

Brown v. State

50 Tex. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1906

State v. Brown

64 Md. 199 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 22, 1885

The defendants in the cause were the Annapolis and Elkridge Railroad Company, and the trustees, Stewart Brown and Arthur George Brown. … Aurora City v. West, 7 Wallace’s Reports, (S. C.,) 102.

Brown v. Commonwealth

551 S.W.2d 557 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1977

See Murray v. Commonwealth, Ky., 474 S.W.2d 359, 360 (1971); and Thomas v. Commonwealth, Ky., 412 S.W.2d 578, 579 (1967), citing the same resuit in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967). … See Dawson v. Cowan, 531 F.2d 1374, 1376-77 (6th Cir.1976).

Brown v. State

99 Miss. 719 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1911

The following authorities clearly support this view: Snow v. State, 54 Ala. 138 ; Snow v. State, 58 Ala. 372 ; West v. State, 76 Ala. 98 ; Owensby v. State, 82 *727 Ala. 63 , 2 South. 764 ; Welsh v. … Y.) 454; State v. White, 68 N. C. 158 ; State v. Gee, 92 N. C. 756 ; State v. Fletcher, 24 Or. 295 , 33 Pac. 575 ; Peck v. State, 86 Tenn. 267 , 6 S. W. 389 ; Rhea v. State, 10 Yerg. (Tenn.) 258; Horton v. State (Tex.

Ryerson v. Brown

35 Mich. 333 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1877

Brown, Ibid., 603; but it has since been declared that, if the question were new, and the court not embarrassed by previous decisions, a different conclusion would doubtless be reached. — Fisher v. Horicon Iron & Manf. … In Tyler v.

Brown v. Lunt

37 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

Fowler v. Bebee, 9 Mass. 231 ; Nason v. Dillingham, 15 Mass. 170 ; Bucknam v. Ruggles, 15 Mass. 180 ; Commonwealth v. Kirby, 2 Cush. 577 ; Plymouth v. … Heywood v Hildreth, 9 Mass. 393 ; Brown v. Maine Bank, 11 Mass. 133 ; Waterhouse v. Waite, 11 Mass. 207 ; Cushing v. Arnold, 9 Met. 26 . But in Allen v.

People v. Brown

229 Ill. 2d 374 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2008

In People v. … See also People v.

Brown v. . Foust

64 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict: Garrett v. Smith, ante 93.

Ledyard v. Brown

27 Tex. 393 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

(Clay v. Cooke, 16 Tex., 70 ; Desmuke v. Griffin, 10 Tex., 113 ; Hunt v. Turner, 9 Tex., 385 ; Hunt v. Robertson, 1 Tex., 748 .) … (Mills v. Alexander, 21 Tex., 154 ; Hunt v. Turner, 9 Tex., 385 .) The only other questions in the case grew out of Ledyard’s assertion of title under the statute of limitations.

King v. Brown

100 Tex. 109 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1906

Brown, is responsible. (Luck v. Zapp, 21 S. W. Rep., 418 .) … Brown for which he must be held responsible. In support of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, the case of Maddox v. Hudgeons ( 73 S.

Tio v. Brown

131 Wis. 573 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1907

Brown and Joseph L. Schallaire to the plaintiff March 1, 1895. … Grunert v. Spald ing, 104 Wis. 193 , 80 N. W. 589 . Tbe court also found that there was no sufficient proof to show what particular premises were attempted to be mortgaged, and hence that there could be no reformation.

Daley v. . Brown

167 N.Y. 381 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1901

(Todd v. Nelson, 109 N. Y. 316, 324 ; Caponigri v. Altieri, 165 N. Y. 255, 263 ; Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 , 190 ; Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 106 N. Y. 157 .) As was said by Chief Justice Nelson in Ford v. … Brown, one of the defendants, testified that Finnegan was foreman of the excavation and hired laborers, but did not hire or discharge engineers.

Zerby v. Brown

280 Minn. 514 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 28, 1968

Brown” and thereupon granted Zerby’s adoption petition. … Brown objected, in any event, to conducting any hearing on the adoption petition at the same time as a hearing for the termination of the parental rights. He relies upon Wilson v. Barnet, 275 Minn. 32 , 144 N.

Brown v. State

32 Tex. Crim. 119 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1893

Mitchell v. Turnpike Co., 3 Humph., 455 ; Devereaux v. City of Brownsville, 29 Fed. Rep., 742; Baldwin v. The State, 21 Texas Cr. App., 591. 1. … Powers v. The State, 23 Texas Cr. App., 42; Walker v. The State, 13 Texas Cr. App., 618; Shearman v. The State, 1 Texas Cr. App., 215. 7.

State v. Brown

2020 ND 29 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Feb 12, 2020

State v. … Brown argues the district court erred by issuing a pre-trial order allowing the State to introduce at trial evidence of past incidents of domestic violence that occurred between Brown and the victim within the three week