Case law

State v. Brown

64 Md. 199 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 22, 1885

The defendants in the cause were the Annapolis and Elkridge Railroad Company, and the trustees, Stewart Brown and Arthur George Brown. … Aurora City v. West, 7 Wallace’s Reports, (S. C.,) 102.

Brown v. State

99 Miss. 719 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1911

The following authorities clearly support this view: Snow v. State, 54 Ala. 138 ; Snow v. State, 58 Ala. 372 ; West v. State, 76 Ala. 98 ; Owensby v. State, 82 *727 Ala. 63 , 2 South. 764 ; Welsh v. … Y.) 454; State v. White, 68 N. C. 158 ; State v. Gee, 92 N. C. 756 ; State v. Fletcher, 24 Or. 295 , 33 Pac. 575 ; Peck v. State, 86 Tenn. 267 , 6 S. W. 389 ; Rhea v. State, 10 Yerg. (Tenn.) 258; Horton v. State (Tex.

Ryerson v. Brown

35 Mich. 333 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1877

Brown, Ibid., 603; but it has since been declared that, if the question were new, and the court not embarrassed by previous decisions, a different conclusion would doubtless be reached. — Fisher v. Horicon Iron & Manf. … In Tyler v.

Brown v. . Foust

64 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict: Garrett v. Smith, ante 93.

Owen v. Brown

447 S.W.2d 883 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1969

United Ass’n of Journeymen, Etc. v. Borden, 160 Tex. 203 , 328 S.W.2d 739 (1959); Family Investment Co. of Houston v. Paley, 356 S.W.2d 353 (Tex.Civ.App.1962, writ dism’d); Grogan Mfg. Co. v. … Lane, 140 Tex. 507 , 169 S.W.2d 141 ; Speckels v.

Brown v. State

8 Blackf. 561 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1847

People v. Brown

253 Mich. 537 · Michigan Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1931

Darling, v. Warden, 154 App. Div. 413 ( 139 N. Y. Supp. 277 ); Andrews v. State, 50 Tenn. 165 ( 8 Am. Rep. 8 ). And in State v. … In People v.

King v. Brown

100 Tex. 109 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1906

Brown, is responsible. (Luck v. Zapp, 21 S. W. Rep., 418 .) … Brown for which he must be held responsible. In support of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, the case of Maddox v. Hudgeons ( 73 S.

Davis v. Brown

221 Ill. 2d 435 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 2, 2006

Citing to Shortridge v. Sherman, 84 Ill. … He is substituted for Kirk Brown as a defendant in this action.

Brown v. State

913 S.W.2d 577 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1996

Brown v. State, No. 12-92-0351-CR slip op., — S.W.2d - (Tex.App.—Tyler July 29, 1994). … Relying on Riley v.

Daley v. . Brown

167 N.Y. 381 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1901

(Todd v. Nelson, 109 N. Y. 316, 324 ; Caponigri v. Altieri, 165 N. Y. 255, 263 ; Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 , 190 ; Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 106 N. Y. 157 .) As was said by Chief Justice Nelson in Ford v. … Brown, one of the defendants, testified that Finnegan was foreman of the excavation and hired laborers, but did not hire or discharge engineers.

Zerby v. Brown

280 Minn. 514 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 28, 1968

Brown” and thereupon granted Zerby’s adoption petition. … Brown objected, in any event, to conducting any hearing on the adoption petition at the same time as a hearing for the termination of the parental rights. He relies upon Wilson v. Barnet, 275 Minn. 32 , 144 N.

Brown v. State

32 Tex. Crim. 119 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1893

Mitchell v. Turnpike Co., 3 Humph., 455 ; Devereaux v. City of Brownsville, 29 Fed. Rep., 742; Baldwin v. The State, 21 Texas Cr. App., 591. 1. … Powers v. The State, 23 Texas Cr. App., 42; Walker v. The State, 13 Texas Cr. App., 618; Shearman v. The State, 1 Texas Cr. App., 215. 7.

State v. Brown

2020 ND 29 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Feb 12, 2020

State v. … Brown argues the district court erred by issuing a pre-trial order allowing the State to introduce at trial evidence of past incidents of domestic violence that occurred between Brown and the victim within the three week

Brown v. Zimmerman

18 Ill. 2d 94 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

McGlaughlin v. Pickerel, 381 Ill. 574 ; Moneta v. Hoinacki, 394 Ill. 47 . The evidence clearly shows that Simon Brown had the complete confidence of his principal George Goldman. … In Reese v.

Brown v. Webster

90 Neb. 591 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1912

Brown, Homer H. BroAvn and Laura E. … Dittberner, 65 Neb. 167 , 70 Neb. 544 ; Peterson v. Estate of Bauer, 76 Neb. 652 ; Peterson v. Bauer, 83 Neb. 405 ; Pemberton v. Heirs of Pemberton, 76 Neb. 669 ; Harrison v. Harrison, 80 Neb. 103 ; Cobb v.

State v. Brown

253 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1960

The principles of law applied by this Court in State v. Wilson, 216 N.C. 130 , 4 S.E. 2d 440 , are controlling on this appeal. … State v. Wilson, supra. ■ *197 The judgment of July 1960 recites that the court heard evidence “of the State and the defendant.”

Brown v. Bridges

31 Iowa 138 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 28, 1870

Ruble v. McDonald, 18 Iowa, 497 ; Hamilton v. State Bank, 22 id. 311. … Wickham v. Freemam, 12 Johns. 183 ; Stuyvesant v. Dunham , 9 id. 61 ; Campbell v. Arnold, 1 id. 510.

Brown v. Commonwealth

2 Rawle 40 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1829

Brown, and made out a report, signed by two of the three auditors, finding a balance in favour of Brown of two hundred and seventy-seven dollars. … Brown, is unnecessarily extravagant. “TV. R. Powers.” Afterwards, one of the auditors who had signed the account, changéd his opinion.

Cothran v. Brown

357 S.C. 210 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jan 27, 2004

See Hawkins v. Bruno Yacht Sales, 353 S.C. 31, 42 , 577 S.E.2d 202, 208 (2003). In Hayne Fed. Credit Union v. … See Pittman v.