Case law

R-G

8 I. & N. Dec. 128 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1958

(Accord, Matter of V--, 56096/451, 1 I. & N. Dec. 293; distinguished, Matter of V—, A 8613142, 7 I. & N. Dec. 565. … The factor which distinguishes Matter of V — , 7 I. & N.

Nibley-Mimnaugh Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1935

That court remanded the proceeding on May 7, 1934, Commissioner v. … In accordance with the court’s mandate directing that the decision of the Board be reinstated, if the Board finds that petitioner was on an' accrual basis, Judgment will be entered of “Deficiency or overpayment, none; and

Herthel v. Dubbs

65 F.2d 138 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1933

Harvey v. Short, 55 App. D. C. 199, 4 F.(2d) 165 , citing Broadwell v. Long, 36 App. D. C. 418, 423. … the Board and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals have a right to entertain the appeal on priority and it may be that, as in Lee and Hogan v.

McSheffrey v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 21 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2003

Bank v. … Haines v.

Petry Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 525 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1923

In United States v. Olivotti & Co. ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 46 ; T. … See Lazarus v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 508, 509 ; T. D. 32247); United States v. Downing ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 545 ; T.

Clement Brothers Company, Inc. v. The United States

418 F.2d 1356 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1970

The case was thus commenced here on July 16th. 1 *1358 Invoking Universal Ecsco Corps, v. … Terteling & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 390 F.2d 926, 927 , 182 Ct.

08-38 289

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015

The Board finds this rationale is not wholly sufficient as it does not squarely address whether the Veteran's hypertension was caused by his service-connected PTSD. Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007); Stefl v. … Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 517 (1995); Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 589 (1991).

Gaines v. United States

158 Ct. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

See also Post v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 94 ; Tabbutt v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 495 ; Gray v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 312 . … See, e.g., Farley v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 776 ; Anderson v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 365 ; Parks v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 415 .

Engineered Timber Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner

74 T.C. 808 · United States Tax Court · Jul 22, 1980

In Jones v. … Holding in Aero Rental v.

Fageol v. Midboe

56 F.2d 867 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1932

When an award of priority was made by the Board of Appeals, and an appeal was perfected from the decision making such award, the whole field of priority of conception, on the record, came before this court. Braren v. … Headley & Thompson v. Bridges, 48 F.(2d) 938 , 18 C. C. P. A. 1331, 1336; Podlesak v. McInnerney, 26 App. D. C. 399; Wickers v. McKee, 29 App. D. C. 4, 19; Wintroath v. Chapman, 47 App. D. C. 428.

Application of Homer E. Allen, Deceased, by Helen M. Allen

343 F.2d 482 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 17, 1965

The patentee in Miller v. … The decision of the board is reversed. Reversed. .

Kerrigan Iron Works, Inc. v. Commissioner

17 T.C. 566 · United States Tax Court · Sep 28, 1951

Harris v. Lemming-Harris Agricultural Works, 43 S. W. 869 . Under these circumstances, the action of petitioner’s board of directors in fixing Kerrigan’s salary is without significance. … Fitzgerald Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald, 137 U. S. 98, 111 ; Church v. Harnit, 35 F. 2d 499 .

Honbarrier v. Commissioner

115 T.C. 300 · United States Tax Court · Sep 29, 2000

See Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935); Wortham Mach. Co. v. United States, 521 F.2d 160 (10th Cir. 1975); Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner, 60 F.2d 937 (2d Cir. 1932); Atlas Tool Co. v. … See, e.g., Abegg v.

a. W. Duckett & Co., Inc. v. United States

58 Ct. Cl. 403 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1923

It does appear in Finding V, and we will treat it as if the reference to the finding were correctly stated. … For its third ground of objection the plaintiff alleges error in that it is stated in Finding V that “ a board of appraisers was appointed by the Secretary of War to determine proper compensation to be paid the terminal company

Terrell v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 171 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 28, 1984

Armstrong v. United States, 594 F.2d 804 , 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 761 (1974). See also Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 298 (1979); Weide v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 432, 435 (1984). … Terrell v. United States, Cl.Ct. No. 408-83C, Administrative Record Part VI, at 006 (September 12, 1983). The board specifically noted that it had considered all of the evidence and information provided by Mr.

United States v. Petry Co.

11 Ct. Cust. 240 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1922

In the case of Dutton v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 460, 466 ; T. … D. 37781); also Wakem & McLaughlin v. United States ( 10 Ct. Cust. Appls., 24 ; T. D. 38259).

200620-96930

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 27, 2021

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … Hatlestad v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 524, 529 (1993).

09-34 348

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 252 (1999); see Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Sean Nikkila v. Department of Energy

Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 21, 2022

v. … Cir. 2009).  6 (1990)); see Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 110 M.S.P.R. 381, ¶ 10 (2009).

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 22, 2014

Safety Consultants, Inc. v. … Safety Consultants, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.