Case law

Alpirn v. United States

111 F. Supp. 280 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1953

United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U. S. 121 . No proof was offered on this point and the rule is controlling here. … Interstate Circuit Inc. v. United States, 306 U. S. 208 .

Tel-Electric Co. v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 434 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1925

In this case the Board clearly has jurisdiction to consider the deficiency in tax found by the Commissioner for the years 1918 and 1919. … Taxpayer relies upon the decision of the Court of Claims in the case of the Brilliant Coal Company v. United States, 59 Ct.

D-I-M

24 I. & N. Dec. 448 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

Hellman, Esquire, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma BEFORE: Board Panel: OSUNA, Acting Chairman; COLE and PAULEY, Board Members. … See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(1), (2) (2007); see also Niang v. Gonzales, 422 F.3d 1187, 1194 (10th Cir. 2005).

J-C-A-G

29 I. & N. Dec. 331 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Sep 19, 2025

See, e.g., Herrera-Martinez v. … See Matter of A-A-F-V-, 29 I&N Dec. 118, 122 (BIA 2025) (recognizing that the Board reviews de novo the ultimate question of whether the alien’s predicted harm satisfies the legal definition of torture).

LENNING

17 I. & N. Dec. 476 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

However, the ability of the Board and Service to fairly determine which marriages are viable and which are not has been seriously questioned. See Dabaghiavi, v. Civiletti, 607 F.2d 868 (9 Cir. 1979), Chan v. … to be no longer viable, has backslided_ Seizing on two aspects. of this particular New York case, the Board pretends to distinguish Chan v.

Thompson v. Dunn

166 F.2d 443 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 6, 1948

See Bastian v. Champ, 34 App. D. C. 225, 1910 C. D. 321; Peterson v. Thomas, 56 App. D. C. 113, 10 F. (2d) 908; George O. Beidler v. Arthur W. Caps and Ivan E. Leininger, 17 C. C. P. A. … See also, Stapleton v. Kinney, 18 App. D. C. 394, 1901 C. D. 414; Hawkins v. Ward, 1912 C. D. 50; Clement v. Roberts, 51 App. D. C. 29, 1921 C. D. 243; Russell v. Sisson, 55 App. D. C. 401, 1925 C. D. 274; Brogden v.

Underwood v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1926

On June 16, 1919, after the first contract was made the Shipping Board adopted the following resolution: “Resolved, That hereafter the United States Shipping Board will allow a commission of V/i per cent to brokers selling … the extent of the authority conferred by law upon the board, or upon any of its employees by the board.

Iron Balls International Ltd. v. Bull Creek Brewing, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 4, 2024

This Section “gives the Board the equitable power to, inter alia, restrict the goods or services identified in an application or registration.” Embarcadero Techs., Inc. v. … Lukens Inc. v.

JWK International Corp. v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 650 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2002

V 1999). … Group, Inc. v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 10, 15 (2000); see also TRW, Inc. v. Unisys Corp., 98 F.3d 1325, 1327 (Fed.Cir.1996); LaBarge Prods., Inc. v. West, 46 F.3d 1547, 1555 (Fed.Cir.1995) (citing Burroughs Corp. v.

Prewitt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 10, 2025

“[J]udicial review of decisions of military correction boards is conducted under the [Administrative Procedure Act]” standard of review. Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2009); see Brooks v. … Correction Board becomes the first proper board to act (or to be asked to act) on the matter’”) (quoting Friedman v.

10-45 909

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 22, 2012

Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 471 (1995); see also nonprecedential Ponder v. Shinseki, No. 09-0881, 2010 WL 4241571, at *3 (Vet. App. October 28, 2010).

R-G

8 I. & N. Dec. 128 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1958

(Accord, Matter of V--, 56096/451, 1 I. & N. Dec. 293; distinguished, Matter of V—, A 8613142, 7 I. & N. Dec. 565. … The factor which distinguishes Matter of V — , 7 I. & N.

CHAIREZ

26 I. & N. Dec. 819 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2016

Cassidy, Associate Legal Advisor BEFORE: Board Panel: PAULEY, MALPHRUS, and GREER, Board Members. … PAULEY, Board Member: On October 30, 2015, the Attorney General ordered the Board to refer this matter to her for review in Matter of Chairez and Sama, 26 I&N Dec. 686 (A.G. 2015).

Nibley-Mimnaugh Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1935

That court remanded the proceeding on May 7, 1934, Commissioner v. … In accordance with the court’s mandate directing that the decision of the Board be reinstated, if the Board finds that petitioner was on an' accrual basis, Judgment will be entered of “Deficiency or overpayment, none; and

Stencel v. Nordine

481 F.2d 916 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 2, 1973

See Koval v. Bodenschatz, 463 F.2d 442, 447 , 59 CCPA-,- (1972). … Koval v. Bodenschatz, supra. The totality of testing must be considered to ascertain whether or not the standards have been met. See Voisinet v. Coglianese, 455 F.2d 1064, 1068 , 59 CCPA -.,- (1972).

Petry Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 525 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 28, 1923

In United States v. Olivotti & Co. ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 46 ; T. … See Lazarus v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 508, 509 ; T. D. 32247); United States v. Downing ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 545 ; T.

Clement Brothers Company, Inc. v. The United States

418 F.2d 1356 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1970

The case was thus commenced here on July 16th. 1 *1358 Invoking Universal Ecsco Corps, v. … Terteling & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 390 F.2d 926, 927 , 182 Ct.

08-38 289

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015

The Board finds this rationale is not wholly sufficient as it does not squarely address whether the Veteran's hypertension was caused by his service-connected PTSD. Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007); Stefl v. … Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 517 (1995); Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 589 (1991).

Gaines v. United States

158 Ct. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

See also Post v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 94 ; Tabbutt v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 495 ; Gray v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 312 . … See, e.g., Farley v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 776 ; Anderson v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 365 ; Parks v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 415 .

Engineered Timber Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner

74 T.C. 808 · United States Tax Court · Jul 22, 1980

In Jones v. … Holding in Aero Rental v.