Case law

Logistics and Rental Car SARL

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024

Mingus Constructors v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390 (Fed. Cir. 1987); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962). … Co. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1389, 1390-91 (Fed. Cir. 1982).

13-35 400

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 17, 2018

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994). … See Parker v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 116 (1994); Harris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 180, 183 (1991).

Hensel v. United States

6 Ct. Cust. 162 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1915

This decision of the board was affirmed by the United Statés Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Rheims (T. … In the case of United States v.

Iron Bow Technologies, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 9, 2014

P. 56(a); Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390 (Fed. Cir. 1987). The government questions whether the CO possessed the authority to bind the government to the contract. … , and the Board does not now address it.

Sevgi Cook v. Department of the Army

Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 16, 2022

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Brown v. General Services Administration, No. 2021-1996, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2 (Fed. Cir. … Brown, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2.

Dynalectron Corp. v. United States

545 F.2d 736 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1976

Circuit Court in Keystone Acceptance Corp. v. Dynalectron Cor p., 445 F. 2d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1971). … The facts here are distinguishable from those in our opinion in Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 179 Ct.

In re Ehrreich

590 F.2d 902 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1979

. § 112 was sustained by the board. We reverse. … It is only by proceeding in this manner that we may fairly determine the scope and content of the prior art according to the mandate of Graham v.

Foster Wheeler Corp. v. Commissioner

40 B.T.A. 1 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 1, 1939

by the Board. … United States v. Updike, 281 U. S. 489 . Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U. S. 589 . Langford v. United States, 101 U. S. 341, 344 .

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States

553 F.2d 651 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

See ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 743 , 524 F.2d 680 (1975). … Co. v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 164 , 455 F.2d 527 (1972); and Dynamics Corp. of America v. United States, 182 Ct. Cl. 62 , 389 F.2d 424 (1968).

06-24 779

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). Service connection may be granted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by service. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.303. … Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128, 137 (1997). The Veteran was discharged from active duty in February 1971, after approximately six weeks of service, due to mental and physical deficiency.

Olympia Veneer Co. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 892 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1931

Dry Goods Co. v. United States, and White v. Hood Rubber Co., 280 U. S. 453 . … The case of White v.

200113-69276

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 16, 2020

App. 465, 470 (1994) and Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 91, 93 (1993). … See Jones v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 137-138 (1994).

Kramer Trenton Co. v. Carl O. Walcutt, Dba the Winterizer Company

408 F.2d 479 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1969

In its opinion the board noted certain testimony of appellant-opposer’s witness that the marks were used on competitive goods. … Shoe Corp. of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corp. of America, 266 F.2d 793 , 46 CCPA 868, (1959) ; Lever Brothers Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co., 41 F.2d 408 , 17 CCPA 1272 (1930) ; The School Mfg. Co., Inc. v.

Anthony v. Commissioner

66 T.C. 367 · United States Tax Court · May 27, 1976

Speaking of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals, the Supreme Court explained in Old Colony Tr. Co. v. … Both the House Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committees indicated that “Under the new appellate procedure from the board * * * the jurisdiction of the board in tax matters is similar to that heretofore held by the

Emery v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 303 · United States Customs Court · Jun 11, 1952

or planks were put together, and that tongues and grooves were put on the ends of some of the boards or planks as well as on the edges. … The distinction is perhaps best demonstrated when the situation which obtained in the case of Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United States, 16 Cust. Ct. 134 , C.

M-S-I

29 I. & N. Dec. 61 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Mar 27, 2025

Sanchez Amador v. Garland, 30 F.4th 529, 534 (5th Cir. 2022). … See Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Tabora Gutierrez v. Garland, 12 F.4th 496, 504 (5th Cir. 2021).

Lewisville Inv. Co. v. Commissioner

56 T.C. 770 · United States Tax Court · Jul 15, 1971

Brown. Hollis Clement_ 5,000 Name Amount Roland L. Walker_. $10, 000 Walter A. Clement. 5,000 George L. … Leland was not on the board of directors of any of these corporations.

GLJ, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 7, 2024

Bubble Room, Inc. v. United States, 159 F.3d 553, 561 (Fed. Cir. 1998). A party challenging a motion for summary judgment “must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. … Accordingly, the verbal agreement does not provide an independent basis upon which this Board would have jurisdiction to issue an order enforcing its terms. Winter v. FloorPro, Inc., 570 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed.

Matula v. Commissioner

40 T.C. 914 · United States Tax Court · Sep 3, 1963

Petitioner s reliance on Commissioner v. Heininger, 320 U.S. 467 (1943); Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488 (1939); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933); and Kornhauser v. … Commissioner v.

09-49 945

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 29, 2015

See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 39 (1993). The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ). VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. … The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999).