Case law

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2022

Moran * v. … * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Kimberly S.

Dongwook Lee v. Department of the Army

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 3, 2024

v. … Generally, the Board lacks the authority to review an employee’s decision to resign, which is presumed to be a voluntary act. Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 9, aff’d sub nom. Brown v.

Brinton v. Commissioner

28 B.T.A. 472 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 20, 1933

Brinton v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 53715, 55341, 55342. United States Board of Tax Appeals 28 B.T.A. 472 ; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1127 ; June 20, 1933 , Promulgated *1127 1. … Farmer v. Zinn, 261 S.W. 1073 ; Heller v. Heller, 233 S.W. 870 ; Scaggs v. Deskin, 66 S.W. 793 ; Smith v. Butler, supra.

United States v. F. W. Myers Co.

33 Cust. Ct. 578 · United States Customs Court · Nov 9, 1954

Leggett & Co.) v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 536 , Reap. … United States v. M. Minkus, 21 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 382, T. D. 46912; United States v. Mexican Products Co., 28 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 80, C. A.

Application of Albert W. Musgrave

431 F.2d 882 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 8, 1970

After further discussion of the case of Don Lee, Inc. v. … In the first opinion by Judge Smith we showed how this erroneous idea arose from a dictum in Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780 , 24 L.Ed. 139 (1876), and is inconsistent with several later Supreme Court opinions.

14-38 514

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

Thus, this claim is still before the Board. AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993). … The Court held, in Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Doherty v. Dubbs

68 F.2d 373 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1934

Sweetland v. Cole, 53 F.(2d) 709 , 19 C. C. P. A. 751; Thompson v. Pettis, 44 F.(2d) 420 , 18 C. C. P. A. 755; Moore v. Greene, 48 F.(2d) 960 , 18 C. C. P. A. 1317, with their respective citations. … From our own examination of the testimony and study of the respective devices, we do not feel justified in overruling the findings of the board in this respect. In the case of Williams v.

Spofford v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1897

(United States v. Bank of Metropolis, 15 Peters, 377 .) … In tbe case of United States v. Langston ( 118 U.

Stanley v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 356 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 26, 2002

Stanley v. Principi, 283 F.3d 1350 (Fed.Cir.2002). On August 29, 2000, this Court affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part an October 27, 1998, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board). … See Scates, 14 Vet.App. at 64 ; see also Snyder v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 285, 296-97 (2001).

10-24 682

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

See generally Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997), and Barrera v. Gober, 122 F.3d 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … While the Board is cognizant of the Court's decision in Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet.

Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 1 · United States Customs Court · Dec 27, 1965

Gonzalez v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 9 , C.D. 1949. … Gonzalez v. United States, supra.

09-27 549

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 821 (2002); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. … Although a Veteran's claim does not survive his death, see Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994), certain individuals may be entitled to accrued benefits under certain conditions.

HERRERA

23 I. & N. Dec. 43 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2001

, GRANT, MOSCATO, MILLER, BRENNAN, ESPENOZA, and OSUNA, Board Members. … The request for a stay will be granted. 1 Board Member Kevin A.

Combat Support Associates

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 16, 2015

On 10 December 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Sikorsky Aircraft Co. v. United States, 773 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2014). … of Contract Appeals 1 Appellant's motion contained a request that the Chairman refer the motion to the Board's Senior Deciding Group pursuant to paragraph 4 of the Board's Charter

H-N

22 I. & N. Dec. 1039 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

Dissenting Opinion: COLE, Board Member, joined by HEILMAN, Board Member. … See United States v. Menasche, supra, at 538 (“‘The cardinal principle of statutory construction is to save and not to destroy.’” (quoting National Labor Relations Board v.

Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,707 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 15, 1989

Consolidated Edison Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). We proceed on that basis. … Inasmuch as the claims were before the Board on liability only, there is no authority in the court at this point to address the issue of quantum. United States v.

Walter v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 26 · United States Customs Court · Jul 9, 1959

In a decision in the case of Max Scheuer & Bros. v. United States, 27 Treas. … Nootka Packing Co. et al. v. United States, 22 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 464, T.D. 47464, is cited for the rule that an eo nomine designation covers all forms of the enumerated article.

Application of National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Doing Business as National Distillers Products Co

297 F.2d 941 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 12, 1962

As was stated in Avon Shoe Co., Inc. v. … Roth Co., Inc. v.

J-P

22 I. & N. Dec. 33 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

- BERGER, and JONES, Board Members. … See Lindh v.

Logistics and Rental Car SARL

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 24, 2024

Mingus Constructors v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390 (Fed. Cir. 1987); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962). … Co. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1389, 1390-91 (Fed. Cir. 1982).