Case law

County of Orange

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 4, 2022

See Conolty v. Conolty O’Connor NYC LLC, 111 USPQ2d 1302, 1309 (TTAB 2014) (registration is the only issue within the Board’s limited jurisdiction). … See, e.g., Lockhart v.

16-01 000

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 18, 2019

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … KANE Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board D. Leamon, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Roscoe Price v. Department of Education

Merit Systems Protection Board · May 1, 2024

v. … See Brown v. Department of the Air Force, 88 M.S.P.R. 22, ¶ 5 (2001) (holding that laches bars a claim when an unreasonable delay in bringing the claim has prejudiced the party against whom the action is taken).

Estate of Nitto v. Commissioner

13 T.C. 858 · United States Tax Court · Nov 30, 1949

Cohan v. Commissioner (CCA-2), 39 Fed. (2d) 540. … See Akers v. Scofield (CCA-5), 167 Fed. (2d) 718; certiorari denied, 335 U. S. 823 . See also Wilcox v. Commissioner, supra; Humphreys v. Commissioner (CCA-7), 125 Fed. (2d) 340; certiorari denied, 317 U.

Binghamton Simulator Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 21, 2014

Winter v. FloorPro, Inc., 570 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2009). Parties that are not in privity of contract with the government may not avail themselves of the CDA's appeal provisions. … See FloorPro, 570 F.3d at 1371; Admiralty Construction, Inc., by National American Insurance Co. v. Dalton, 156 F .3d 1217, 1220-21 (Fed. Cir. 1998); United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 713 F.2d 1541, 1550-51 (Fed.

Guy Roberts Lumber Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,335 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1984

Most of the claims involved before both the Court and the Board are duplicate or mirror image claims. Such duplicate claims should be decided in one forum. See David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc. v. … V 1981), and consolidated with the following Board eases: AGBCA Nos. 81-240-1, 81-241-1, 82-160-1 and 82-161-1.

Mills Automatic Merchandising Corp. v. United States

19 F. Supp. 247 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

The taxpayer elected to appeal and by so doing brought itself squarely within the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Old Colony Trust Company v. … Emery v. United States (D.C.) 27 F.(2d) 992 , and Old Colony R. R. Co. v. United States (D.C.) 27 F.(2d) 994 , hold that the petitioner still retains this earlier remedy.

O'Hare v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 365 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 11, 1991

Ohland v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 147, 148 (1991). Mr. … We hold again, as we held in Sammarco v.

10-19 052

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

Brown, 8 Vet. … See Jernigan v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 220 (2012). Hence, the Board has no recourse but to conclude that the Veteran has abandoned this claim. See Hyson v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 262 (1993).

Pelagio Mendoza

29 I. & N. Dec. 542 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Apr 3, 2026

Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1006 (9th Cir. 2025). … Radojkovic v. Holder, 599 F. App’x 646 (9th Cir. 2015).

05-13 239

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

See Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 273, 282-3 (1996). VA regulation defines "new and material evidence" as follows. … Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 216, 220 (1994); Justus v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 510, 513 (1992).

Boeing v. Commissioner

46 B.T.A. 492 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 9, 1942

In Moise v. Burnet, 52 Fed. (2d) 1071, this provision of the 1926 Act was considered by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. … Kottemann v. Commissioner, 81 Fed. (2d) 621. No claim was asserted by the respondent at or before the hearing.

United States v. Antony Gibbs & Co.

18 C.C.P.A. 101 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 19, 1930

This court in Sheldon & Co. v. United States, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 42, 46 , T. … Caldwell v. United States, 141 Fed. 487 .

Division of Powers and Responsibilities Between the Chairperson of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Board as a Whole

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Jun 26, 2000

June 26, 2000 m em orandum O p in io n f o r t h e G e n e r a l C o u n s e l C h e m ic a l S a fet y a n d H a z a r d I n v e s t ig a t io n B o a r d Y o u … Rose V, Chairperson, United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, from Larry L.

Doncaster v. Commissioner

77 T.C. 334 · United States Tax Court · Aug 11, 1981

See, e.g., Brown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1981-294 . Often we have a "trial,” the respondent putting on his case without the presence or participation of the taxpayer. … Giles v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1977-278 . Miller-Pocahontas Coal Co. v.

Bishop v. United States

673 F.2d 1369 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1982

Cason v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 424, 432 , 471 F.2d 1225, 1230 (1973). … Sanders v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 962 (1975); Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1975); Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct.

Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United States

341 F.2d 590 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965

This court has held many times that such a question of contract interpretation is one of law concerning which the Board’s decision has no binding effect. See Beacon Const. Co. v. … See Pacific Sewer Pipe Co. v.

08-14 259

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

The Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the appellant. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). … See Degmetich v. Brown, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Rabideau v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 141, 143 (1992); Gilpin v. Brown, 155 F.3d 1353 (Fed.

Jo-Mar Corp. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,571 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1988

Co. v. … A contract board of appeals has, and must have, discretionary power to manage its docket. Metadure Corp. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 61, 66-67 (1984).

United States Steel Corp. v. United States

536 F.2d 921 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

Fissinger, V. C. Sutcliffe, and Mr. Harris for USS. … Contracts § 5 (1963) ; Carpenter v. Josey Oil Co., 26 F. 2d 442 (8th Cir. 1928). The Board so held in this case.