Case law

Morton-Norwich Products, Inc. v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

531 F.2d 561 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 8, 1976

We agree with the board that the close relationship of the parties’ goods and the similarity of commercial impressions of the marks are such that confusion would be likely. Spice Islands, Inc. v. … The board’s statement that likelihood of confusion from the simultaneous use of the parties’ marks on their goods is indicative of probable damage is clearly correct. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v.

In re Hornsey

48 F.2d 911 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1931

The board sustained the examiner in holding that “ there is no invention in substituting the reduction step of Stansfield in the process of Rendall,” and the board states further that:. … (Patents) 568, 34 F. (2d) 1012; and Line Material Co. v. Brady Elec. & Mfg. Co., 299 Fed. 824 .

210421-154492

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2021

See Brammer v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 233, 225 (1992) (noting that service connection presupposes a current diagnosis of the claimed disability); see also Chelte v. Brown, 10 Vet. … Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996), citing Gilbert, 1 Vet. App. at 54. 5.

Johnston v. United States

157 Ct. Cl. 474 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1962

O'Brien v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 655 ; Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 647 ; Prichard v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 212 ; Towell v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 422 ; Robert L. Thompson v. … See McEaddy v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 311 .

James Harding v. Samuel Steingiser and Ival O. Salyer

318 F.2d 748 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1963

In Blicke v. … In support of that holding the board relied on Teter v. Kearby, 169 F.2d 808 , 36 CCPA 706, and Schering Corp. v. Marzall, D.C., 101 F.Supp. 571 .

United States v. Dorn

13 Ct. Cust. 130 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 3, 1925

The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest upon the theory that, in United States v. Stegemann, decided May 5, 1924, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 198 , T. … D. 40179, this court had intended to depart from the rule previously declared in United States v. Francklyn, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 54 , T. D. 33306, and in United States v. Hirsch, Stein & Co., 8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 121 , T.

C. R. Bard, Inc. v. Foley Bag Catheter, Inc.

394 F.2d 582 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 16, 1968

We find no reversible error in the board’s finding that the answer amounts to a proper pleading. 4 . C. R. Bard, Inc. v. Foley Bag Catheter, Inc., 132 USPQ 470 (T.T. & A.B., 1961). 5 . … Appellant has cited Fischbeck v. Kleeno, 44 App.D.C. 6 , (1915), and Walgreen Co. v.

Maine Central Railroad v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 411 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 9, 1927

On the question of commercial designation, the board found as follows: That lambs are generally bought and sold as such. … Central Commercial Co. et al. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 131 ; United States v. Beadenkopf Co. et al., 8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 283 .

Application of Maximilian Paul Schmidt

293 F.2d 274 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 16, 1961

We do not consider the cases cited by the board to be dispositive of the issue here. In its decision, the board relied heavily upon the decision of the District Court in John Blue Company, Incorporated v. … In John Blue Company, Incorporated v. Dempster Mill Mfg.

Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States

77 Ct. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1933

Knapp v. United States, 46 C.Cls. 601; Coleman v. United States, 152 U.S. 96 ; Bigby v. United States, 188 U.S. 400 . In Bigby v. … In Coleman v.

12-28 819

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2014

Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994). … The Board finds the Veteran's 1975 denial of back pain to be more probative than his recollection - three decades later - that he was experiencing back pain. See Curry v. Brown, 7 Vet.

09-03 190

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993). In July 2014, the Veteran testified at a Board hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge. A transcript of that proceeding is of record. … See Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998).

Black v. United States

28 Fed. Cl. 177 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1993

See Black v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 461 (1991); Black v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 465 (1991); Black v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 471 (1991); Black v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 268 (1992). … See Hutter v. United States, 345 F.2d 828 , 170 Ct.Cl. 517 (1965); Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 445 (1960); Suter v.

Morimura Bros v. United States

8 Ct. Cust. 211 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 20, 1917

United States v. Zinn ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 419 ; T. D. 32171). … They are United States v. Muhlens et al. ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 496 ; T. D. 33917) and United States v. Vantine ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 516 ; T. D. 33937).

Wilson & Son (Inc.) v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 234 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1926

In Naday ds Fleischer, supra, the board followed this court in United States v. Douglas & Berry, 6 Ct. Cust. … Dec. 163 ), United States v. Douglas & Berry ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 100 ; T. D. 35342), and United States v. White & Co. (3 Id. 382; T. D. 32968). With this conclusion we agree. .

In re Wiseman

596 F.2d 1019 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 26, 1979

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-3, 6, 9, and 10 in appellants’ application serial No. 639,391, filed … Although there may be patentable invention where the solution is obvious after the discovery of the cause of the problem, Eibel Process Co. v.

Malm v. Schneider

101 F.2d 201 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1939

Schneider appealed ex parte to the Board of Appeals. … The decision of the board is affirmed.

Pride v. United States

40 Fed. Cl. 730 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 18, 1998

Defendant, however, argues that a favorable determination by the Correction Board cannot mark the accrual of plaintiffs cause of action and points to Haislip v. … The Correction Board corrected CMSgt.

Pender Peanut Corp. v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 447 · United States Court of Claims · May 23, 1990

NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). The starting point for determining the parameters of agency authority is the language of the enabling statute itself. Consumer Prod. … Consequently, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) had authority to assess a penalty under § 128, the provision at issue. .

Richter v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2025

The MECO and ICIPT boards of directors knew about both companies’ financial situations. See ECF No. 19-6 at 44 (“The board knew exactly what was going on. They knew where the money was short. … United States, 579 F.2d 938, 940 (5th Cir. 1978); whether he or she successfully paid withholding taxes in a different quarter, Brown v.