Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • Zlotolow v. United States

    40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,910 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 1996

    It can only be destroyed or overcome by convincing and uncontradicted evidence to the contrary which clearly and distinctly establishes a fact so that reasonable minds can draw but one inference. Id. … Damages At trial, plaintiffs tried to qualify plaintiff Adolfo Zlotolow as an expert on damages.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States

    94 Fed. Cl. 189 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 2010

    By using the phrases “notwithstanding any other provision of law ... a contract opportunity shall be awarded on the basis of competition to qualified HUBZone small business concerns,” Congress established a priority for the … To further the goal of aiding small businesses, Congress has established certain programs to assist qualifying small businesses in obtaining “a fair proportion” of Federal contracts. 2 Id. §§ 631(a), 637(a)(1)(C), 657a.

    Reversed on other grounds by DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States, 690 F.3d 1335 (2012)Cited 25 timesPublished
  • American Floor Consultants & Installations, Inc. v. United States

    70 Fed. Cl. 235 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 14, 2006

    However, “[i]t is well established that the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction only where and to the extent the government has waived its sovereign immunity, and any waiver of sovereign immunity cannot be implied but … Consequently, if a plea, immunity, or witness protection agreement is violated, the United States is obligated to pay money for its breach “only if the agreement clearly and unmistakably subjects the United States to monetary

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • J v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2022

    furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … Zamvil tried to establish that the mechanism of molecular mimicry could instigate immune-mediated disease processes, he had offered little in the way of evidence directly connecting the Tdap vaccine to TM in this manner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelsey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 4, 2026

    Kelsey has not established that he is entitled to compensation. Mr. … Kelsey’s asserted onset (one day) was too rapid to qualify for a presumption of causation. See 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a)¶ XIV.D. Mr. Murphy also stated that Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William E. Frasure , Jr. v. Anthony J. Principi

    18 Vet. App. 379 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 14, 2004

    Merchant Marine, it is unclear whether the Board properly considered all documents before it, and it would thus be premature for the Court to determine whether the Board's denial of the claim for qualifying service was "clearly … VA must also assist the appellant by determining whether his DD Form 214 clearly described the nature of his service or whether it was issued solely to establish active-duty service for the purpose of burial and interment

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • WING'S TEA HOUSE

    16 I. & N. Dec. 158 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1977

    Clearly then, the alien beneficiary did not possess the requisite one year experience at the time the petition was "filed," and did not gain a year as a Chinese food specialty cook until April 1975. … In the event a new labor certification request is submitted and certified by the Department of Labor and the petitioner submits a new petition, a later filing date will be established. This appeal will be dismissed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Loyd v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 2021

    The record clearly established the CBC panel ordered at Ms. Loyd’s request revealed a normal platelet level of 340,000. Id. at 112–13; Ex. 2 at 40. Dr. … In attempting to establish entitlement to a Vaccine Program award of compensation for a Non-Table claim, a petitioner must satisfy all three of the elements established by the Federal Circuit in Althen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • L. M. Daniels and Clayton G. Leonard v. The United States

    407 F.2d 1345 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

    It was found that no adequate salary formula could be established upon a classification of the relative functions, experience, and qualifications of the pilots, since most pilots performed or were qualified to perform the … As plaintiffs admit in their cross-motion, defendant’s position is clearly correct. Burich v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Potter v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2022

    “The United States, as sovereign, is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued.” United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 586 (1941). The waiver of immunity “cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” … Further, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith because, as alleged, plaintiff’s claim is clearly beyond the jurisdiction of this court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Manley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    18 Cl. Ct. 799 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 16, 1989

    Clearly, the Medical Review, Dr. … Congress clearly intended that fees and costs be distinct from “compensation.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lorain Avenue Clinic v. Commissioner

    31 T.C. 141 · United States Tax Court · Oct 23, 1958

    Since petitioner’s trustees did not establish any schedule fixing the charges which could be made, each doctor was free to fix the amount of his fees as he saw fit. … It is concluded, upon the entire record, that petitioner did not qualify for exemption from tax under section 101 (6) in any of the years 1945-1953, inclusive.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. United States

    20 C.C.P.A. 134 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1932

    If hospitals conducted by the Federal Government are immune from taxation by the States, and the Supreme Court has expressly held that they are so exempt, although clearly not necessary to maintain the sovereignty of the … Though not expressly stated, this is clearly implied in that part of the opinion of Chief Justice Taft in the case of Hampton & Co. v. *169 United States, supra, hereinbefore quoted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Halliburton Co. v. Commissioner

    93 T.C. 758 · United States Tax Court · Dec 26, 1989

    Under the Accords, Iran agreed to establish a $1 billion security account in the Hague with the frozen assets which Iran agreed to replenish if the account fell below $500 million. … See also the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. secs. 1602-1611 (1982).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Phang v. United States

    87 Fed. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2009

    Although “[t]he Tucker Act provides the waiver of sovereign immunity necessary to sue the United States for money damages ... the plaintiff must establish an independent substantive right to money damages from the United … A plaintiff bears the burden of proof to establish subject matter jurisdiction. McNutt v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 , 56 S.Ct. 780 , 80 L.Ed. 1135 (1936); Russell v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • YEUNG

    21 I. & N. Dec. 610 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996

    vice, assertion of immunity from prosecution, or a violation relating to a con- trolled substance if it relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana. … Second, there is no evidence that Congress acted clearly to bar this alien from relief, as we contend in our decision.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Boggs v. Commissioner

    83 T.C. 132 · United States Tax Court · Jul 24, 1984

    In 1962, when the trust was established, the CQmpany had approximately 50 employees. Five of these employees, including petitioner, were salaried employees covered by the trust. … Upon the trust’s termination in 1976, petitioner established an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), with the First National Bank of Ironton acting as the custodian thereunder.

    Vacated on other grounds by Henry T. Boggs and Jeanne Boggs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Henry T. Boggs and Jeanne Boggs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 784 F.2d 1166 (1986)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Esprit Corp. v. United States

    35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,551 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1988

    For two of these claims, because of the lack of credible testimony, the court was forced to use a “jury verdict” approach to establish damages. Esprit Corp. v. … Underwood, 108 S.Ct. at 2553-54 , the Supreme Court stated: [T]he exception for “limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved” must refer to attorneys “qualified for the proceedings” in some specialized

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Al Ghanim Combined Group Co. Gen. Trad. & Cont. W.L.L. v. United States

    67 Fed. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2005

    An EAJA applicant must make a three-part showing in order to establish that it is a qualified party under the EAJA: It must show that (1) its net worth was less than $7 million at the time the action was filed; (2) it did … Only after the applicant has established that it meets these requirements and qualifies for an award under the EAJA must the Government show that its position “in the underlying litigation was ‘substantially justified!)]’

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Granite Constr. Co. v. Commissioner

    19 T.C. 163 · United States Tax Court · Nov 7, 1952

    First, the temporary and unusual character of the circumstance or event must be clearly established. … (a) General Rule. — In any ease In which the taxpayer establishes that the tax computed under this subchapter (without the benefit of this section) results in an excessive and discriminatory tax and establishes what would

    Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.