Case law

MARIN

16 I. & N. Dec. 581 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1978

See r-issian v. … Also see se etion 241(h)• Crwart Chow Tok v. INS, 538 F.2d 36 (2 Cir. 1976); Oliver v. INS, 517 F.2d 426 (2 Cir. 1975).

13-35 325

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

See Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed.Cir.2009); Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed.Cir.2007); Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247 (1999); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. … See Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed.Cir.2009); Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed.Cir.2007); Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247 (1999); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.

In Re Bager

47 F.2d 951 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1931

Brill v. Third Ave. R. Co. (C. C.) 103 F. 289 ; Edison Electric Light Co. v. Novelty Incandescent Lamp Co. (C. C. A.) 167 F. 977 ; A. R. Mosler & Co. v. Lurie (C. C. A.) 209 F. 364 ; Munising Paper Co., Limited, v. … Jockmus v. Leviton (C. C. A.) 28 F.(2d) 812 .

Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. Rogers

368 F.2d 866 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 23, 1966

Thereby the board was advised of appellants’ understanding of the board’s action on claim 56. … In Helene Curtis Industries v.

United States v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.

1 Ct. Cust. 362 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911

Evidence was taken before the board. One of the samples sent to the board, as before stated, and which weighed a little less than a pound, was tested by the examiner of rice for the port of New York. … Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that the principle established in United States v. Ranlett ( 172 U. S., 133 ) may well be applied here.

Application of United Biscuit Company of America

404 F.2d 998 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1968

Hood & Sons, Inc. v. … by the board.

Palmer v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 541 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1984

Bockoven v. Marsh, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984). … The 1976 lieutenant colonel, AUS, selection board had 15 members, two of whom (or 13.3 percent) were Reserve officers. Some 33.1 percent of the officers that selection board considered were reserves. . Teeter v.

Hazan v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 66 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 27, 1987

In those cases where releases have been held not to bar additional claims, either the plaintiffs had two claims and the release of one claim did not release the other, Hiett v. … By accepting the relief recommended by the Board, the plaintiff has released his claim for the relief denied by the Board. Pilgreen v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 903, 905 (1982).

Harold R. Conn v. The United States

376 F.2d 878 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Cole v. United States, 171 Ct.Cl. 178 (1965); Middleton v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 36 (1965); Smith v. United States, 155 Ct.Cl. 682 (1961). … Middleton v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 786 (1966). 1 .

Veith v. United States

10 Ct. Cust. 201 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 23, 1920

The board herein, however, did not find upon that question, but, following Cross Co. et al. v. United States ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 43 ; T. D. 36308), and Saji & Kariya Co. et al. v. United States ( 9 Ct. Cust. … In United States v.

Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States

49 Fed. Cl. 313 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2001

Co. v. … As an initial matter, the responsibility for water allocation is vested in the State Water Resources Control Board. Cal. Water Code §§ 174 ,179; California v.

E. W. RODRIGUEZ

25 I. & N. Dec. 784 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2012

Dissenting Opinion: PAULEY, Board Member. … Ass’n v.

Trace v. United States

25 T.C. 538 · United States Tax Court · Dec 16, 1955

French v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 13 T. C. 276 . … Greaves v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 10 T. C. 886 .

Application of George J. Dean

291 F.2d 947 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 7, 1961

In support of its construction of the claims, the board cites Kropa v. … ■On rehearing, the board bolstered its position by further citation of one of the 37 cases considered in Kropa v.

Application of John F. Corr

347 F.2d 578 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1965

See In re Sus, 306 F.2d 494 , 49 CCPA 1301; In re Dean, 291 F.2d 947 , 48 CCPA 1072, and Chicago Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnside Foundry Co., 132 F.2d 812 (7th Cir. 1943). … See Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde, 242 U.S. 261 , 37 S.Ct. 82 , 61 L.Ed. 286 (1916).

09-50 943

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

Pelegrini v. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 112 (2004); see also Mayfield v. Nicholson, 444 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2006). The duty to notify was satisfied by way of a September 2014 letter sent to the Veteran. See Dingess v. … See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384, 394 (1993); see also Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994).

Weather-Seal Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

16 T.C. 1312 · United States Tax Court · Jun 11, 1951

Rossman Corporation v. Commissioner, 175 F. 2d 711 , and National Brass Works, Inc., 16 T. C. 1051 . Cf. Lilly v. Commissioner (C. A. 4, 1951), 188 F. 2d 269 , affirming 14 T. … In the recent case of American Pitch Pine Export Co. v. Commissioner (C.

AMBROSIO

14 I. & N. Dec. 381 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1973

In a letter to counsel dated May 14, 1973, the immigration judge stated that the records on appeal had been forwarded to this Board and suggested that counsel submit his brief directly to this Board. … Regardless of the truth of any self-serving assertion of fraud at entry they now put forward, section 241(f) does not benefit them, Cabuoo-Flores v. INS, 477 P2d 108 (C.A. 9, 1973); Matter of Mangabat, supra.

United States v. Shallus

2 Ct. Cust. 332 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 28, 1911

United States ( 13 Pet., 486 ); United States v. Vowell ( 5 Cranch, 368 ); Arnold v. United States ( 9 Cranch, 103 ); Lawder v. Stone ( 187 U. S., 281 ); Stone v. Shallus (143 Fed. Rep., 486); United States v. … The board allowance of 30 per cent is accordingly modified. As thus modified, the decision of the board is affirmed. Modified.

In re Becker

74 F.2d 306 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 7, 1935

C. 321; Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation v. The Butler Co., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 934, 39 F. (2d) 693; 34 C. J. Secs. 1154, et seq. … Plummer v. Sargent, 120 U. S. 442 -448. This conclusion is entirely consistent with the decision of the Primary Examiner.