Case law

MASRI

22 I. & N. Dec. 1145 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

Diaz v. INS, 648 F. Supp. 638, 644 (E.D. Cal. 1986) (citing Malat v. Riddell, 383 U.S. 569, 571 (1966)). It is assumed that the legislative purpose is expressed by the ordinary or plain meaning of the words used. INS v. … Ass’n of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., 484 U.S. 365, 371 (1988); Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 54 (1987); see also Diaz v.

M-W

25 I. & N. Dec. 748 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2012

Burgtorf, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: COLE, PAULEY, and WENDTLAND, Board Members. … People v. Brown, 358 N.W.2d 592, 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984) (citing People v. Aaron, 299 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. 1980); People v. Potter, 5 Mich. 1 (1858)).

Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership v. Harry F. Chaveriat III

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 23, 2008

Opposition No. 91182083 Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership v. … stipulation or motion to that effect.1 Parties must inform the Board, by stipulation or motion, any time they agree to 1 Once an answer has been filed, the Board generally will not approve a motion or stipulation

In re Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Trimboard Siding Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation

867 F. Supp. 2d 1346 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Jun 11, 2012

Prevett v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., C.A. No. 6:12-00348 Southern District of Iowa Alan Todd Brown v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., C.A. No. 4:12-00102 Western District of New York Bristol Village, Inc. v. … No. 1:12-00263 Eastern District of North Carolina Gwen Hart, et al. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., C.A. No. 2:08-00047 Northern District of Ohio Jason Holbrook v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., et al., C.A.

Marcellus S. Hartman v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 432 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 19, 2004

Hartman v. Principi, No. 04-7035, 2004 WL 1178279 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2004). … The Secretary notes that the only case in which the Court had addressed this question was in its opinion in Huston v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 195 (2003), which was subsequently vacated by the Federal Circuit, Huston v.

09-03 344

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

See Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 120 (2007); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1994). … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994).

COTA

23 I. & N. Dec. 849 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2005

See United States v. … See, e.g., Renteria-Gonzalez v.

Francis S. Kilmer MacMillan v. Robert B. Moffett

432 F.2d 1237 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 12, 1970

It is MacMillan’s position that this court, in Smith v. Bousquet, 111 F.2d 157 , 27 CCPA 1136 (1940), applied such a doctrine of simultaneous conception and reduction to practice. Whether or not the holding in Smith v. … Bousquet was based on such a doctrine, this court’s decision in Applegate v.

Stern v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 124 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 1, 1912

Limitations of this kind were defined by this court in the recent case of Lazarus, Rosenfeld & Lehmann v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 508 ; T. D. 32247). … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is accordingly modified.

Christopher Vincent Kroll v. Department of Homeland Security

2014 MSPB 69 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 26, 2014

See Office of Personnel Management v. … ID at 7; see Crum v. Department of the Navy, 75 M.S.P.R. 75, 81 (1997) (the Board lacks jurisdiction to review classification decisions).

Retrobrands America LLC v. Molson Coors Beverage Company USA LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Apr 25, 2024

By the Board: This proceeding now comes before the Board for consideration of Respondent’s motion (filed January 25, 2024) to dismiss the petition to cancel without prejudice as moot based on Respondent’s failure to … Men’s Wearhouse, LLC v. WKND NYC LLC, 2024 USPQ2d 86, at *2 (TTAB 2024) (citing Taylor v. Motor Trend Grp., LLC, 2023 USPQ2d 1051, at *2 (TTAB 2023)).

Unicon Management Corporation v. The United States

375 F.2d 804 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967

See Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc. v. United States, 361 F.2d 222, 228 , 175 Ct.Cl. 527, 536 (1966). … Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 1, 7 , 314 F.2d 501 , 504 (1963); Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

In Re Dollar General Corp. Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation

346 F. Supp. 2d 1368 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Nov 9, 2004

Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation Northern District of Alabama Edith Brown, et al. v. Dollar General Stores, Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 7:02-673 Southern District of Georgia Tina Depasquales v. Dollar General Corp., C.A. … No. 4:04-96 Southern District of Ohio Karen Buckley v. Dollar General Corp., C.A. No. 2:04-484 Western District of Oklahoma Sheila Ann Hunsucker v. Dollar General Corp., et al., C.A. No. 5:04-165

Application of Edward M. Rothermel and Russell B. Waddell, Jr

276 F.2d 393 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 30, 1960

Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co., 261 U.S. 45 , 43 *398 S.Ct. 322, 67 L.Ed. 523 ; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. v. Ray-O-Vac Co., 321 U.S. 275 , 64 S.Ct. 593 , 88 L.Ed. 721 . … Vv’e think there is a factual distinction between the present case and the cases relied upon by the board.

John W. Anderson v. Anthony C. Scinta, Anthony C. Scinta v. John W. Anderson, (Two Cases)

372 F.2d 523 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1967

We agree with the board. Swan v. Thompson, 80 F.2d 374 , 23 CCPA 806, cited by Anderson, is not authority for reaching a contrary conclusion. … Hendrickson & Nelson v. Ronning & Ronning, 76 F.2d 137 , 22 CCPA 1040; Loukomsky v. Gerlich, 264 F.2d 907 , 46 CCPA 805. The decision of the board in PA 6941 is affirmed.

06-03 851

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 3, 2015

3.102; Alemany v. … Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518 (1996). ORDER Waiver of the recovery of indebtedness in the amount of $2000 is granted. ____________________________________________ JOHN J.

SIPUS

14 I. & N. Dec. 229 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1972

INS, 400 F.2d 675 (CA. 9, 1968); Kwan Shick Myung v. INS, 368 F.2d 330 (C.A. 7, 1966). … "technical inadequacy" (as the Board opinion puts it).

MySpace, Inc. v. Donnell Mitchell

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 11, 2009

v. Donnell Mitchell Before Seeherman, Rogers and Taylor, Administrative Trademark Judges. … plaintiff’s counsel, in direct violation of the Board’s order.

190814-19281

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 31, 2020

Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). … KESSEL Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board William Pagan, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Sheffner v. Gallo

515 F.2d 1169 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 15, 1975

Mortsell v. Laurila, 301 F.2d 947 , 49 CCPA 1028 (1962). See Rule 258, 37 CFR 1.258. … DeGroff v. Roth, 412 F.2d 1401 , 56 CCPA 1331 (1969), “[t]here can be no derivation without prior conception on the part of the party alleging derivation.” Egnot v. Looker, 387 F.2d 680 , 55 CCPA 782 (1967). .