Case law

Application of Selmi

156 F.2d 96 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 11, 1946

See Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co., 324 U.S. 320, 329 , 65 S.Ct. 647 , 89 L.Ed. 973 ; In re Gillett, 133 F.2d 910 . 30 C.C.P.A., Patents, 900. … board.

Tiffany & Co. v. National Gypsum Co.

459 F.2d 527 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1972

Compare Phillips Petroleum Co. v. C. J. Webb, Inc., 58 CCPA 1255, 442 F. 2d 1376 , 170 USPQ 35 (1971). There are three points from the board’s opinions on which we will comment briefly. … Shawnee Milling Co. v.

John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 698 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955

The Government’s attorney before the Board, and the Board itself, would have been more familiar with the "plaintiff’s complex, Government-written contract than plaintiff’s counsel was. … The interpretation of the contract, which was the key to the Board’s decision, was not a question of fact on which the Board’s decision was final, under the contract. McWilliams Dredging Co. v.

American Express Co. v. United States

4 Ct. Cust. 279 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 26, 1913

Notably was this true in American *280 Graphophone Co. v. Amet ( 74 Fed., 789 ). … See also Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. ( 154 Fed., 58 ).

Al Rafideen Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 7, 2015

In so doing, the certification "push[es] contractors into being careful and reasonably precise in the submission of claims," Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 937 (Fed. … Lehman, Inc. v. United States, 673 F.2d 352, 354 (Ct. Cl. 1982).

200110-54547

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2020

See also Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet. … When faced with conflicting medical opinions, the Board may favor one medical opinion over the other. See Evans v. West, 12 Vet. App. 22, 30 (1998), citing Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 429, 433 (1995).

201012-121238

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 14, 2021

See Porter v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 233, 235-36 (1993); Glover v. West, 185 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 1999). … See Cook v. Principi, 318 F.3d 1334, 1345-47 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (citing Caffrey v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 102 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 26, 1912

As was well said by Townsend, Judge, in Downing v. United States (141 Fed. … In the case of United States v. China & Japan Trading Co. (71 Fed.

Chisolm v. United States

65 Fed. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2005

Citing the principle that the court will not substitute its judgment for that of the board’s, Wronke v. … The court based its decision on two earlier eases, Porter v. United States 163 F.3d 1304, 1321 (Fed. Cir.1998), and Richey v.

In Re Delphi Corp. Securities, Derivative

403 F. Supp. 2d 1358 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Dec 12, 2005

No. 1:05-2637 Thomas Morrison v. Delphi Corp., et al, C.A. No. 1:05-2656 Robert Hillman v. Delphi Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:05-2732 Vanessa Jones v. Delphi Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:05-3323 Ira Gaines v. … (Delphi); Delphi Board of Directors; Delphi Board of Directors Executive Committee; Delphi Employee Benefits Committee; Delphi Employee Benefits Plan Executive Committee; Delphi Mechatronic Board of Directors; Delphi Trust

Levy v. Commissioner

25 B.T.A. 1174 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 19, 1932

This view would reverse several of the Board decisions just cited, as well as subsume that in United States v. Provident Trust Co. of Pennsylvania, 281 U. … earlier decision of this Board.

Food Specialty Co., Inc. v. Standard Products Company, Inc.

406 F.2d 1397 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1969

We think it sufficient merely to point out that the validity of the registration of a mark may be tested only by a cancellation proceeding. 2 Contour Chair-Lounge Co. v. … See: The Murray Corporation of America v. Red Spot Paint and Varnish Co., Inc., * * * and The Fleetwood Company v. Mende * * *. 3 [Emphasis added.]

Bulova Watch Company, Inc. v. Waltham Watch Company

408 F.2d 1062 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1969

While we agree with the board that there are differences between the involved marks in sound, meaning, and appearance, we think the board has over-analyzed the marks. … United States Time Corp. v. Jacob Tennenaum (Tennenbaum & Co., Telix Watch, assignee, substituted), 46 CCPA 895, 267 F.2d 327 , 122 USPQ 15 (1959).

Al Ghanim Combined Group W.L.L.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 18, 2026

United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 895-96 (1996) (quoting Lynch v. … And, the Board has no obligation to “scour the record” to prove a party’s speculative arguments. Parsons Evergreene, LLC v. Sec’y of Air Force, 968 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed.

Hendrick v. United States

150 Ct. Cl. 437 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1960

Register v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 98 . As a matter of fact, there is a strong presumption that the disability had its origin in line of duty. Moore v. United States, 48 Ct. Cl. 110 . … The board, after deliberating on the evidence, made the following recommended findings: (1) That Thomas Francis Hendrick, BMGC, V-6, TTSNR, #172 0012, be found unfit to perform the duties of his rate by reason of physical

Clark v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 166 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 7, 1992

See Harris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 180 (1991). On appeal to this Court, appellant, instead of claiming a rating of one-hundred-percent, claims that he is entitled to a seventy-percent rating for his PTSD. … See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). In Karnas v.

JOSEPH

22 I. & N. Dec. 799 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

V. … The Maryland case law relied upon by the Immigration Judge, Cover v.

Jabez-Absher Small Business Joint Venture

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 2, 2025

V. … KSCP v. Mattis, 852 F.3d 1370, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Universal Fiberglass Corp. v. United States

537 F.2d 393 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

In Frantz Equipment Co. v. United States, 120 Ct. … We held in Frantz Equipment Co. v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 622, 631 , 105 F.

United States v. Davies

13 Ct. Cust. 547 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1926

The issue here, therefore, reduces to the question of whether the above finding of the board is supported by any substantial evidence Metz & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 412 , T. D. 41340, and cases cited. … In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 351 , T.