Case law

Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. Alpha Phi Omega

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 31, 2016

Toro Co., 61 USPQ2d at 1174; see also National Pork Board v. … See Ferro Corp. v.

Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. Alpha Phi Omega

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 31, 2016

Toro Co., 61 USPQ2d at 1174; see also National Pork Board v. … See Ferro Corp. v.

Universal Fiberglass Corp. v. United States

537 F.2d 393 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

In Frantz Equipment Co. v. United States, 120 Ct. … We held in Frantz Equipment Co. v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 622, 631 , 105 F.

J. Wiss & Sons Co. v. W. E. Bassett Co.

462 F.2d 567 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 13, 1972

Bassett Co. v. H. C. Cook Co., 156 F. Supp. 209 , 115 USPQ 111 (D. Conn. 1957); W. E: Bassett Co. v. Revlon, Inc., 147 USPQ 309 (S.D. N.Y. 1965), aff'd 354 F. 2d 868 , 158 USPQ 170 (2d Cir. 1966). … Hall Co. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 52 CCPA 981, 985, 340 F. 2d 960, 963 , 144 USPQ 435 , 438 (1965).

Shafer v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 640 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1925

Jacobs v. Hoitt, 119 Wash. 283 , was an action by a creditor to subject certain property to a judgment against Hoitt, collectible only *645 from his separate property. … Brown at the time of his marriage.”

In re Lincoln

126 F.2d 477 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 23, 1942

See Schiller v. Robertson, 28 F. (2d) 301, and In re McNeil, 1902 O. … (Patents) 1140, 57 F. (2d) 365; Schiller v. Robertson, 28 F. (2d) 301; In re Grapp, 20 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1042, 64 F. (2d) 376.

Ace Construction Company, a Corporation v. The United States

401 F.2d 816 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

It is well settled that an issue not raised before the Board cannot be raised for the first time before this court. Beaconwear Clothing Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 348 F.2d 968 , 172 Ct.Cl. 560 (1965) ; cf. Perini Corp. v. United States, 381 F.2d 403 , 180 Ct.Cl. 768 (1967). 9 . See Norfolk Dredging Co. v.

Franz v. Commissioner

58 T.C.M. 1357 · United States Tax Court · Feb 12, 1990

BROWN FRANZ, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Franz v. Commissioner Docket No. 20996-88 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1990-62 ; 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 62 ; 58 T.C.M. (CCH) 1357 ; T.C.M. … In the Motion to Vacate, petitioner contends that her case is governed *64 by a previous order of this Court in the case of Texas Basic Education Systems v.

In re Blaisdell

242 F.2d 779 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 29, 1957

The board adequately presented the background of this proceeding as follows: The instant application was involved in an interference No. 83,587, Blaisdell v. Allen v. … Co. v. Crescent Forge & Shovel Co. et al., 179 F. 856 (7th Cir. 1910). Appellant places much reliance upon Goodwin et al. v.

In re Clorox Co.

578 F.2d 305 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1978

The board affirmed the examiner on both grounds. The board noted that the language of § 2(d) is not restricted to marks registered on the Principal Register. … Hess v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., 94 USPQ 11 (Comm’r 1952). The solicitor cites Standard Int'l. Corp. v. American Sponge and Chamois Co., Inc., 394 F.2d 599 , 55 CCPA 1155, 157 USPQ 630 (1968).

California Federal Bank v. United States

39 Fed. Cl. 753 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 22, 1997

FACTS CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK v. … LASALLE TALMAN BANK, F.S.B. v.

Elizabeth Solomon v. Department of Defense

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 6, 2025

v. … Grassell v. Department of Transportation, 40 M.S.P.R. 554, 564 (1989).

Kaiser Industries Corporation v. The United States

340 F.2d 322 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. … On the other hand, who can tell what difference the important fact involved might have made in the Board’s consideration of the case? Cf. Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v.

Cramp Shipbuilding Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 72 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1952

See Martin Wunderlich v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 92, 212 , reversed on other grounds 342 U. S. 98 ; McWilliams Dredging Co. v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 1, 16 , for *98 discussion and citations. … The plaintiff urges that a contractor with the Government is not prejudiced by his failure to take a vain appeal, citing United States v. Smith, 256 U. S. 11 . In United States v. Blair, 321 U.

11-28 444

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204 (1994). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995).

United States v. Pacific Trading Co.

14 Ct. Cust. 131 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 8, 1926

The appellee’s protest, claiming the merchandise to be dutiable as onions, under paragraph 768, was sustained by the Board of General Appraisers. The United States has appealed to this court. … The issues in this case are almost identical with the issues in the case of United States v. La Manna, Azema & Farnan et al., 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 123 , T.

Schmalstig v. Commissioner

43 B.T.A. 433 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 28, 1941

United States v. … Reviewed by the Board. Sec. 307.

Bruton v. United States

34 Fed. Cl. 347 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 1995

See Scharf v. Department of the Air Force, *353 710 F.2d 1572, 1574-75 (Fed.Cir.1983); Taylor v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 86, 92 , 591 F.2d 688, 692 (1979); Christie v. … It is also recognized by this court that resort to a correction board is permissive and does not toll the statute of limitations. Sanders v. United States, 32 Fed.Cl. 573, 575 (1995); D'Andrea v.

Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan and Courtney Tsotigh v. Pro Football, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 5, 2011

This proceeding mirrors prior litigation before the Board of a disparagement claim under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §1052(a), Harjo v. … Gwin v. Curry, 161 F.R.D. 70, 71 (N.D.

In re Siu

222 F.2d 267 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 22, 1955

See Underwood v. Gerber, 1893 C. D. 340; 630 O. G. 1063 ; 149 U. S. 224 . … We therefore affirm the board’s decision without further and unnecessary comment. § 253.