Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • Dalton H. Pritchard and Alfred C. Schroeder v. Bernard D. Loughlin

    360 F.2d 250 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 28, 1966

    As authority, the Board cited Loukomsky v. Gerlich, 264 F.2d 907 , 46 CCPA 805. … Creed et al. v. Potts, 96 F.2d 317 , 25 CCPA 1084; Haglund v. Potts, 109 F. 2d 816 , 27 CCPA 981; Belden et al. v. Klingele, 112 F.2d 805 , 27 CCPA 1232; McCabe et al. v. Scheele, 112 F. 2d 800 , 27 CCPA 1265; Mantz v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Atkinson v. United States

    144 Ct. Cl. 585 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

    As we stated in Misuraca v. United States, 135 C. Cls. 387 and in DeBusk v. United States, 132 C. … This problem was considered by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Thomas v. Ward, 225 F. 2d 953 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • 14-24 924

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 18, 2018

    See Davis v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 209, 211 (1997); Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 71 (1997). … See Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043-44 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Reaves v. United States

    128 Fed. Cl. 196 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2016

    See Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Kennedy v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 309, 329 (2015); Boyle v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 592, 595-96 (2011). … See Walters v. United States, 358 F.2d 957, 962 (Ct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Loeb v. United States

    133 Ct. Cl. 937 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

    Opinion per curiam: In all material aspects this case is identical with Gapps v. United States, No. 50425, decided this date, ante p. 811. … The report of the V. A. examination of June 27,1946, is as follows: Chief Complaints. — The patient states he cannot run because of pain in the right heel due to fracture of the right os calcis in August 1942.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • The Learning Journey International, L.L.C. v. Hua Yongfu

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 6, 2024

    The Board does not resolve disputes of material fact on summary judgment; rather, the Board only ascertains whether disputes of material fact exist. See Univ. Book Store v. Univ. of Wis. … [Thus,] the Board’s determination of registrability does not require, in every instance, decision on every pleaded claim.”); see also Venture Out Props. LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 08-17 292

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

    Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 05-31 436

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 12, 2011

    Routen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 183 (1997). … The Board has the fundamental authority to decide a claim in the alternative. See Holbrook v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 91 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 07-19 389

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

    See Rudd, supra; see also Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426 (1994). … See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Rice Co.

    9 Ct. Cust. 165 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 15, 1919

    D. 22265); United States v. Richard, on natural grass, sun-bleached, used for emblems ( 99 Fed., 262 ); acquiescence of Department (T. D. 21984); Bayersdorfer & Co. v. … D. 23665); Simpson v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 222 ; T. D. 31952); United States v. Wallace ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 142 ; T. D. 33413); Hartranft v. Wiegmann ( 121 U. S., 609 ).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Nathan v. Commissioner

    19 T.C. 865 · United States Tax Court · Feb 18, 1953

    Brown, 16 T. C. 623 , cited by respondent, sustains his contention in the instant case, as does Thomas E. Hogg, 13 T. C. 361 . … In an Illinois case of Walters v. Walters, 94 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wah Shang Co. v. United States

    44 C.C.P.A. 155 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 7, 1957

    D. 39142; Shun Yuen Hing & Co. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 331 , T. D. 39143; and Brown & Co. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 402 , T. D. 39320. … See Wing Yee Chong & Co. v. United States ( 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 329 ; T. D. 39142).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dynalectron Corp.

    199 Ct. Cl. 996 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1972

    On the basis of the f oregoing, the court concludes that the decision of the Supreme Court in S & E Contractors, Inc. v. … United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394 (1966).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • HP Enterprise Services LLC

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 17, 2014

    .,,- -i,, ~ l -Z,(_~ ELIZABETfl-1\v. … the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schweyer v. Thomas

    68 F.2d 953 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 26, 1934

    Isom v. Dubbs, 58 App. D. C. 25, 24 F.(2d) 467 . In the case of Dreyfus v. Lilienfeld, 49 F.(2d) 1062 , 18 C. C. P. … Petersen v. Thomas, 56 App. D. C. 113, 10 F.(2d) 908 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Continental Nut Co. v. Cordon Bleu

    494 F.2d 1397 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 25, 1974

    ” because this mark can be translated from the French as “BLUE RIBBON” and that, under Morehouse Manufacturing Company v. … Le Cordon Bleu, S.a.r.l. v. Continental Nut Company, 177 USPQ 734 (TTAB 1973). . Continental Nut Company v. Le Cordon Bleu, S.a.r.l., Oust. & Pat.App. 494 F.2d 1395 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rhodes v. Commissioner

    44 B.T.A. 1315 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 29, 1941

    Hulburd v. Commissioner, 296 U. S. 300 . … The fact that he recited in his petition before the Board that he was no longer executor of Mr.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Hass

    141 F.2d 127 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 7, 1944

    See Thompson v. Boisselier, 114 U.S. 1 ; In re Lincoln et al., 29 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 942, 126 F. (2d) 477, 53 USPQ 40 ; Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., 314 U.S. 84 , 51 USPQ 272 . … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gallagher v. United States

    4 Ct. Cust. 291 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1913

    -The latter it may also be said is not verified though setting forth matters déhors the record as required by the rules of the Board of General Appraisers. See generally: Gallagher & Ascher v. United States ( 3 Ct. … D. 33168); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 329 ; T. D. 32055); United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co. ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 410 ; T. D. 32998). Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wasserman v. Commissioner

    24 T.C. 1141 · United States Tax Court · Sep 29, 1955

    In Michaels v. Donato, 67 A. 2d 911 (N. … As said by the court in Michaels v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.