Case law

Pilgreen v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 903 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1982

Before the Corrections Board, the plaintiff sought reinstatement and back pay and allowances to the date of the Board’s action. The Board, however, awarded him back pay only to May 1976. … In those cases where releases have been held not to bar additional claims, either the plaintiffs had two claims and the release of one claim did not release the other, Hiett v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 585 , 130 F.

Ibarra-Vega

29 I. & N. Dec. 476 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Feb 27, 2026

FOR THE RESPONDENT: Milva V. Lehm, Esquire, Phoenix, Arizona FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Conor McNulty, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: MONTANTE, OWEN, and GALLOW, Appellate Immigration Judges. … See id.; see also Gonzalez v.

Entwistle Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,807 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 28, 1984

See Ramsey v. … Defendant’s argument disregards the weight accorded the Board’s factual findings. The Board’s factual findings are presumptively correct. Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 56 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 24, 1924

—Union Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Robinson ( 79 Fed. 420 ); Chicago, R. I. & P. Railway Co. v. Chickasha National Bank ( 174 Fed. 923 ) and cases therein cited; First Unitarian Society v. Faulkner et al. ( 91 U. … —United States v. Gavin & Co. ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 292 : T. D. 36804).

Syracuse Food Prods. Corp. v. Commissioner

21 B.T.A. 865 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 23, 1930

Johnson v. United States, 44 Fed. (2d) 244. … The witness Brown, called by the petitioner and admitted by the respondent to be a highly qualified patent attorney, testified that the Merrell-Merrell-Gere process patent could not be operated by other than the owner of

West v. United States

103 Fed. Cl. 55 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2012

See Sanders v. … Fisher v.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 451 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

D. 10414) this board held to the same effect, and the same ruling was laid down in Strausky v. Erhardt (52 Fed. Rep., 808). … Fiske v. Henarie ( 142 U. S., 459 ), Sessions v. Romadka ( 145 U. S., 29 ).

Palmer v. Dudzik

481 F.2d 1377 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 2, 1973

The board further answered appellants’ argument by citation of Howard v. … However, because the board cited Mason v.

Turnage v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

230 Ct. Cl. 799 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1982

ASCS, however, appealed to the board. The board remanded to the field office for reconsideration in light of Wells v. … Harris, supra, which had been decided by the board just a few days earlier, with instructions to reopen the record and to allow ASCS to proceed under chapter 75. The board in Wells v.

Alvin L. Breen v. Walter A. Miller and Herbert G. Stine

347 F.2d 623 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 1, 1965

With regard to the matter of compliance of the experiments with the requirements of the count, the board was satisfied that the nylon and polymer V used by O’Brien, as well as the polyethylene and polymer V used by Hebeler … [Emphasis by the board.]

YANEZ

23 I. & N. Dec. 390 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002

, OSUNA, OHLSON, HESS, and PAULEY, Board Members. … Carmichael, 332 U.S. 388 (1947))); see also United States v. Pornes-Garcia, supra, at 146-47 (recognizing the Board’s “narrow” construction); Reyes-Hernandez v.

Ellis C. Smith v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 448 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 2, 2004

Smith (Ellis) v. Principi, 2004 WL 2030123 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2004) (Smith II). … On June 10, 2003, this Court, by per curiam decision, ordered a December 12, 2000, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA) reversed in part and vacated in part. Smith (Ellis) v.

Arab Shah Construction Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 4, 2016

The Board docketed the appeal as ASBCA No. 60553. 8. … Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 811F.2d586, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

Department of Army v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 330 · United States Customs Court · Dec 5, 1950

United States v. Sherman & Sons Company, 237 U. S. 146 ; Kolynos Co. v. United States, 25 Treas. Dec. 211 , T. D. 33762; Geo. B. Reading v. United States, 46 Treas. Dec. 320 , T. D. 40457; Champion Coated Paper Co. v. … Reading v.

09-18 072

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993). Thus, the issue remains on appeal and has been recharacterized to reflect the staged ratings. … The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999).

Harold R. Conn v. The United States

376 F.2d 878 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Cole v. United States, 171 Ct.Cl. 178 (1965); Middleton v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 36 (1965); Smith v. United States, 155 Ct.Cl. 682 (1961). … Middleton v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 786 (1966). 1 .

Steen v. United States

141 F. Supp. 946 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

This case differs from the case of Updike v. United States, 132 C. … In the case at bar, the Secretary of the Army approved neither the finding of the Retiring Board nor the Physical Evaluation Board.

Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United States

127 F. Supp. 2d 207 · United States Court of International Trade · Dec 12, 2000

Steel Group v. United States, 225 F.3d 1284, 1287 (Fed. Cir. 2000); NSK Ltd. v. United States, 115 F.3d 965, 973 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Koyo Seiko co., Ltd. v. United States, 36 F.3d 1565, 1570 (Fed. … at Thai Hong and Thai Tube, only one non-lineal relative held a seat on Saha Thai’s board; and (3) there was little overlap of board and management positions among the three companies.

Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

518 F.2d 1399 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 7, 1975

Kautenberg Co. v. Ekco Products Co., 251 F.2d 628 , 45 CCPA 761 (1958). The board’s decision is in accord with this prevailing rule. … See Beef/Eater Restaurants, Inc. v. James Burrough Ltd., 398 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1968). Accordingly, the decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. . See Dresser Industries, Inc. v.

Ate My Heart, Inc. v. GA GA Jeans Limited

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jul 22, 2014

See e.g., SEC v. … Olmstead, Inc. v.