Case law

Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United States

99 Ct. Cl. 272 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943

See also Lynch v. United States, 292 U. S. 571, 580. The next question we have to meet is that of the amount of damages to which plaintiff is entitled by reason of the breach of the contract by the defendant. … United States v. Behan, 110 U. S. 338, 344 .

Brownfield

214 Ct. Cl. 826 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 8, 1977

The latter asserts (1) res judicata or collateral estoppel; (2) statute of limitations, and (3) lack of jurisdiction under the doctrine of United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976). … In the most recent reported instance in this court of a Secretary rejecting an AFBCMR recommendation, Boyd v. United States, 207 Ct.

United States v. Meyer

8 Ct. Cust. 27 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 19, 1917

The board held, in view of the testimony, that it was like the commodity before it in Meyer & Lange v. United States, G. A. 7825 (T. … In Bogle v. Magone ( 152 U.

United States v. Andrews

12 Ct. Cust. 258 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1924

The Board of General Appraisers found under the evidence, and therein we concur, that in view of the definition of toys as laid down by this court in Illfelder v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 109 ;. T. … —Wolff v. United States ( 71 Fed. 291 ).

SIPUS

14 I. & N. Dec. 229 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1972

INS, 400 F.2d 675 (CA. 9, 1968); Kwan Shick Myung v. INS, 368 F.2d 330 (C.A. 7, 1966). … "technical inadequacy" (as the Board opinion puts it).

Stockton East Water District v. United States

76 Fed. Cl. 470 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2007

Co. v. … Control Board in 1988.

Rwachsberg Holdings Inc., Apollo Health and Beauty Care Inc. v. Grüne Erde Beteiligungs GmbH

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 8, 2021

v. Grüne Erde Beteiligungs GmbH Before Bergsman, Lynch, and Lebow, Administrative Trademark Judges. … . § 2.101(a); and TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD MANUAL OF PROCEDURE (TBMP) §§ 302 and 304 (2021).

L. B. Samford, Inc. v. The United States

410 F.2d 782 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1969

Plaintiff cites Harvey Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. … Co. v. United States, 151 Ct.Cl. 75 (1960); Bornstein v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 576 , 345 F.2d 558 (1965).

Font v. United States

593 F.2d 388 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1979

Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 372 (1957); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-40 (1959); Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 235 (1974). … The Board was also told not to make comments in Font’s *345 records indicating moral or professional dereliction, and the Board’s report says that it did not consider such comments or allegations.

Jordan v. United States

205 Ct. Cl. 65 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 388 (1966). In Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. … In Hutter v. United States, 170 Ct.

RODRIGUEZ-CARRILLO

22 I. & N. Dec. 1031 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

United States v. … See generally Waldron v. INS, 17 F.3d 511, 518 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1014 (1994); Montilla v. INS, 926 F.2d 162, 167 (2d Cir. 1991) (citing Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 (1974)).

David Berg Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 1349 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 1, 1928

DAVID BERG INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. David Berg Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13102. … Brown, Esq., for the respondent. MARQUETTE *1349 This proceeding is for the redetermination of a deficiency in income and profits taxes asserted by the respondent for the year 1921 in the amount of $58,727.15.

Brooks Paper Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 277 · United States Customs Court · Sep 30, 1949

V., Gruppe E”; that there were four categories of purchasers of matrix board set up by-the Verband, to wit, wholesalers who received a discount of 25 per-centum, dealers who received a 15 per centum discount, agents whose … United States v. Glendinning, McLeish & Co., Inc., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 222 , T.

Pitts v. Commissioner

26 B.T.A. 312 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 8, 1932

But this property is not the subject of the litigation before the Board and is not within our exclusive control. Cf. Foster Federal Practice, Sixth Edition, vol. 2, § 258g. Billings v. Aspen M. & S. Co., 51 Fed. 338 . … Reviewed by the Board.

200916-109557

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 28, 2021

The legal standard for proving a claim is not lowered; rather, the Board's obligation to discuss and evaluate evidence is heightened. See Russo v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 46 (1996). … See Ussery v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 64 (1995).

In re Johnston

502 F.2d 765 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 19, 1974

Accordingly, we cannot sustain the board’s rejection on its stated grounds. … Additionally, the solicitor argues that the holding in the recent opinion of the Supreme Court in Gottschalk v.

Application of Benner

174 F.2d 938 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 12, 1949

See, with their several citations, Braren v. … See Hall v. Shimadzu, 59 F.2d 225 , 19 C.C.P.A, Patents, 1288; Lawson v. Davis, 129 F.2d 873 , 29 C.C.P.A, Patents, 1217. The instant case does not fall within that category.

Alexander Buelna v. Department of Homeland Security

2014 MSPB 45 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 19, 2014

For example, in Cleveland Board of Education v. … See Bosley v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 162 F.3d 665 , 672 (Fed.

G-K

26 I. & N. Dec. 88 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2013

See Medellin v. … Chavarria v.

10-00 318

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 39-40 (1994).