Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.80s
Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 30, 2015
Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995) (en banc) (additional disability resulting from aggravation of a nonservice-connected disorder by a service-connected disorder is also compensable under 38 C.F.R. § 3.310). … See Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d. 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007). The Board finds his testimony credible.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished5 Ct. Cust. 95 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1914
In Dodge et al. v. … In McAllister v.
Cited 7 timesPublished11 I. & N. Dec. 466 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1966
believe that the existence of the commuter status is undesirable and unlawful: it is argued that commuters depress wages and cause unemployment among resident laborers whom Congress obviously desire to protect '(Karnutil v. … Albro, 279 U.S. 231 (1929) ; Amalgamated Meat Cutters cf Butcher Work v. Rogers, 186 F. Supp. 114 (D.C., 1960)).
Cited 4 timesPublishedH. R. Henderson & Co. v. United States
169 Ct. Cl. 228 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965
Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 802, 808-09 , 337 F. 2d 861, 863-64 (1963), and WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. at p. 808 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedJohnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United States
531 F.2d 1037 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976
An appeal would be heard de novo by a board of contract appeals and their remedies would extend even further than to such a board. … Silliman v. United States, 101 U.S. 465 (1879); Loral Corp. v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 473, 482 , 434 F. 2d 1328, 1332 (1970); John Arborio, Inc. v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 432 , 76 F.
Cited 73 timesPublishedNeuchatel Paving Co. v. District of Columbia
17 Ct. Cl. 386 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1881
In Barnes v. District of Columbia ( 91 U. S. … If we had any doubt on this point, we should consider it settled by the Supreme Court of the United States in the recent' case of Clark v. United States ( 95 U. S. R., 539 ), which was decided on appeal from this court.
Cited 3 timesPublished21 I. & N. Dec. 541 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1996
Yamataya v. … The principle that deportation statutes should be construed in the alien’s favor is a longstanding one, recognized, adopted, and reiterated by this Board. See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987); Fong Haw Tan v.
Cited 69 timesPublishedWilliam R. Campbell v. Department of the Army
2016 MSPB 38 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 2, 2016
See Crosby v. U.S. … Id.; see Runstrom v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSyracuse Food Products Corp. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 865 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 23, 1930
Johnson v. United States, 44 Fed. (2d) 244. … The witness Brown, called by the petitioner and admitted by the respondent to be a highly qualified patent attorney, testified that the Merrell-Merrell-Gere process patent could not be operated by other than the owner of
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2021
Watson v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 309 (1993). … Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished7 T.C. 1393 · United States Tax Court · Dec 26, 1946
Hoitt, 119 Wash. 283 ; 205 Pac. 414 ; In re Brown's Estate, 124 Wash. 273 ; 214 Pac. 10 ; In re Hebert's Estate, 169 Wash. 402 ; 14 Pac. (2d) 6 ; State ex rel Van Moss v. … In re Dewey’s Estate, supra; Guye v. Guye, 63 Wash, 340; 115 Pac. 731 . In Julius Shafer, 2 B. T.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 14, 2021
See Brown v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 413 (1993) (Board is required to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence and in compliance with 38 C.F.R. § 3.344, that a rating reduction is appropriate). … Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 40, 43-44 (1993) (citing Russell, 3 Vet. App. at 313-14).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States v. Braun Chemical Co.
2 Ct. Cust. 57 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 10, 1911
The Board of General Appraisers, in sustaining the protest, followed their own decision in the Marx & Rawolle case (T. D. 30644), which was reversed in this court in the case of United States v. Marx & Rawolle ( 1 Ct. … We think it is unnecessary, in view qf our decision in the case of United States v. Garramone (T.
Cited 16 timesPublished11 B.T.A. 1180 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 7, 1928
Gatta v. Phila. B. & W. Ry. Co. (Del.), 76 Atl. 56 ; Zier v. Chesapeake Beach Ry. Co. (Md.), 56 Atl. 385 ; Merrill v. Wright (Nebr.), 74 N. W. 955 ; Love v. So. Ry. Co., 108 Tenn. 104 ; 65 S. W. 475 ; Price v. … Ry. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570 , in which the decision in Union Pacific Ry. Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Commissioner
36 B.T.A. 1122 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 9, 1937
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER, ET AL., 1 v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 44351, 44352, 44353, 46903, 49614, 50424. … Brown, C.P.A., for the petitioners. Philip M. Clark, Esq., and Stanley B. Pierson, Esq., for the respondent. HILL *1122 OPINION.
Cited 2 timesPublished57 Fed. Cl. 743 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2003
See Loeh v. … Id.; see also Fluellen v.
Cited 4 timesPublished48 F.2d 965 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 29, 1931
Besser v. Merrilat Culvert Core Co. (C. C. A.) 243 P. 611 ; Coupe v. Boyer, 155 U. S. 565, 574 , 15 S. Ct. 199 , 39 L. Ed. 263 . … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.
Cited 14 timesPublishedWeston Solutions, Inc. v. United States
95 Fed. Cl. 311 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2010
Contracts Co. v. … See Kerr Contractors, Inc. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015
Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993). … See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 39-40 (1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2 Vet. App. 419 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 21, 1992
Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 52 (1991); 38 U.S.C. *422 § 7261 (a)(4) (formerly § 4061(a)(4)). … Bethea v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 252 (1992) (holding that the benefit of doubt rule does not apply in determining the facts upon which the Court’s jurisdiction is based).
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna