Case law

09-00 591

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 22, 2012

See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 39-40 (1994); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 57 (1990). Competency of evidence differs from weight and credibility. … See Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartwright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,314 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 6, 1983

United States v. Turtle Mountain Band, 222 Ct.Cl. at 8 , 621 F.2d at 521, quoting from Zdanok v. … Federal Corp. v.

The Boeing Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 1, 2015

/7 / ,;://// ~ ~ -{f;~,.v~ … GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Bonewell v. United States

95 Fed. Cl. 752 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 4, 2010

It therefore affirmed the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Similarly, in Davis v. … (citing Brown v. United States, 396 F.2d 989 (Ct.Cl.1968))). In this case, the court is confronted with a situation where the correction board did not consider evidence submitted by the applicant.

Koval v. Bodenschatz

463 F.2d 442 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 3, 1972

See Goodrich v. Harmsen, 58 CCPA 1144, 1153, 442 F. 2d 377, 383 , 169 USPQ 553 , 559 (1971); Hradel v. Griffith, 54 CCPA 911, 367 F. 2d 851 , 151 USPQ 580 (1966). … Feigelman, 59 CCPA 834, 455 F. 2d 596, 604 , 172 USPQ 580 , 587 (1959); Klemperer v. Price, 47 CCPA 729, 271 F. 2d 743 , 123 USPQ 539 (1959). Some, in fact, find clear expression in the board’s opinion.

09-05 380

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

See Soyini v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 540, 546 (1991); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994). … Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994).

Edward R. Marden Corporation v. The United States

442 F.2d 364 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

Accordingly, in Len Co. & Assoc. v. … In Luria Bros. & Co. v.

Mills v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 199 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 18, 1924

, or require this Board to take a similar beneficent attitude that Congress has not seen fit to give the Board power to take. … That has very recently been decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of the New York Central v.

In re Smith

458 F.2d 1389 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1972

See Martin v. Johnson, supra; In re Lukach, 58 CCPA 1233, 443 F. 2d 967 , 169 USPQ 795 (1971). … Compare Martin v. Johnson, supra; Fields v.

10-01 288

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

The Board can accept and rate based on private audiometric test scores that are provided in graph form. See Kelly v. Brown, 7 Vet. … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995). The Court, in Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet.

In re Cohen

133 F.2d 924 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 1, 1943

electrode and cable, and we find nothing in the record to indicate that any diameter of electrode or any length of cable would be sufficient to produce the phase shift. *883 Upon the subject of inherency in the case.of Hansgirg v. … See General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp. et al., 304 U. S. 364 . Claim 23, rejected upon Knowles, reads as 'follows: 23.

Yul Lim Construction Co., Ltd.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 15, 2025

It is well settled that once a contractor files an appeal, the contracting officer’s determination of partial entitlement is not binding on the parties; the Board’s proceedings are de novo. Wilner v. … Co. v. U.S., 28 Fed. Cl. 572, 577 (1993).

Richard Young v. Department of Agriculture

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 16, 2026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD RICHARD YOUNG, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, DC-0752-19-0658-B-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

Chisolm v. United States

82 Fed. Cl. 185 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 30, 2008

requests should be considered by the board. … Whatever the rule of accrual might be in APA challenges to board decisions, such challenges are in any event not within our jurisdiction. Id. at 1313 (citing Murphy v.

Crown Radio Corp. v. Soundscriber Corp.

506 F.2d 1392 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 26, 1974

As we stated in General Electric Company Limited v. … Stanadyne, Inc. v. Lins, 490 F.2d 1396 (CCPA 1974). In Miles Laboratories, Inc. v.

Kutz v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 68 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964

In 1950 the Board decided otherwise on the basis of new evidence. See Kutz v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 329, 331-32 , 132 F. Supp. 117, 118-19 (1955). … The Correction Board later back-dated the advancement to the date of the 1942 Act. See footnote 2, supra. See, e.g., Friedman v. United States, supra; Carver v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 67, 74 (1962) ; Morris v.

Garcia Martinez

29 I. & N. Dec. 169 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Aug 8, 2025

In Medrano-Dominguez v. … See Popoola v.

United States v. Post

3 Ct. Cust. 260 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 17, 1912

These decisions of the board were followed by the case of United States v. … Bayers-dorfer v. United States (122 Fed. Rep., 968).

First National Steamship Co. v. United States

106 Ct. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1946

R., 34); Hollister v. Abbott (31 N. H., 448; 64 Am. Dec., 342 ); Case v. Beauregard ( 101 U. S., 688 ); Lawrence v. Milwaukee ( 45 Wis., 306 ) ; Hopkins v. Lee 16 Wheat., 109 ). … Baltimore & Ohio v. United States, 34 C. Cls. 484, 502 ; Tale & Towne v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 618, 626 .

JEAN

23 I. & N. Dec. 373 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002

V 1999). … Lopez v.