Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • 15-09 419

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

    Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 238, 240-241 (1999). These issues will be returned to the Board after issuance of the Statement of the Case only if perfected by the filing of a timely substantive appeal. … See Smallwood v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 93, 97 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith v. Derwinski

    2 Vet. App. 147 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 15, 1992

    Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 24 (1991). … O’Hare v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 365 (1991).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Leon Wilson v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 20, 2021

    Petitti v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 415, 422 (2015). The Board and the Secretary have both taken the position that, because Mr. … In McCarroll v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. Derwinski

    1 Vet. App. 280 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 30, 1991

    Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990); see, e.g., Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 78 (1990); Sammarco v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 111 (1991); Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121 (1991); Hyder v. … Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 56 (citing SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196-97 , 67 S.Ct. 1575, 1577-78 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947) and International Longshoremen’s Assoc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Application of Albert Bowers and James C. Orr

    359 F.2d 886 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 12, 1966

    The solicitor relies on two decisions in other courts, Sterling Varnish Co. v. Louis Allis Co., 145 F.Supp. 810 (E.D.Wis. 1956), aff’d on rehearing, 149 F.Supp. 826 (1957); and Hays v. … Reynolds, 242 F.Supp. 206 (D.C.1965), aff’d, Hays v. Brenner, 357 F.2d 287 (D.C. Cir. 1966).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Kairos Institute of Sound Healing, LLC v. Doolittle Gardens, LLC

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 17, 2008

    Foods Inc. v. Bunte, 86 USPQ2d 1044, 1048 (TTAB 2008) (“Because M.C.I. failed to comply with the Board's orders [granting motions to compel], sanctions are appropriate.”), and MHW Ltd. v. … Industries Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United States

    3 Ct. Cust. 102 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 26, 1912

    As was well said by Townsend, Judge, in Downing v. United States (141 Fed. … In the case of United States v. China & Japan Trading Co. (71 Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Michelle C Honse v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 1, 2024

    See 4 Brown v. U.S. … The Board has procedures under which an administrative judge may seek to arrange pro bono representation for incompetent appellants. Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, 94 M.S.P.R. 331, ¶ 9 (2003).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richard Young v. Department of Agriculture

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 16, 2026

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD RICHARD YOUNG, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, DC-0752-19-0658-B-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 12, 2018

    Saxton v. Sec’y of HHS, 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Rochester v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re Blaisdell

    242 F.2d 779 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 29, 1957

    The board adequately presented the background of this proceeding as follows: The instant application was involved in an interference No. 83,587, Blaisdell v. Allen v. … Co. v. Crescent Forge & Shovel Co. et al., 179 F. 856 (7th Cir. 1910). Appellant places much reliance upon Goodwin et al. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Botany Worsted Mills v. United States

    63 Ct. Cl. 405 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1927

    sum of $1,565,739.39 in addition to certain nominal salaries paid to the members of said board. … The case of United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Company, 273 Fed. 657 , decided June 13, 1921, seems conclusive on this point.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • David R. Ellis v. United States Postal Service

    2014 MSPB 73 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 9, 2014

    Id. at 27-28. ¶9 The Board has stated that the criteria for proving misrepresentation are the same as those for proving falsification. See Guerrero v. … ID at 11 n.7; see Hulett v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc.

    652 F.2d 69 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 13, 1981

    If the contractor goes the board route, it can later appeal the board’s decision to the court. Section 8(g)(1) of the Act, 41 U.S.C. § 607 (Supp. II 1978). … of Contract Appeals to be consolidated with the case pending before that board in docket No. 5585, citing our order in Warwick Constr., Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Annette S. Hubbell v. Douglas A. Collins

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 13, 2026

    R. 23(a)(1)-(5). 39 Skaar v. Wilkie (Skaar I), 32 Vet.App. 156, 189 (2019) (en banc order), (citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 350 (2011), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom., Skaar v. … Co. of Sw. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 157 (1982)). 55 Gladney-Chase v. Collins, 38 Vet.App. 216, 220 (2025) (quoting Wal-Mart, 564 U.S. at 350); see Monk v. Wilkie, 978 F.3d 1273, 1277 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Application of Bremner

    182 F.2d 216 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 9, 1950

    Co. v. Satler, D.C., 21 F.2d 630 ; Smokador Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Tubular Products Co., 2 Cir., 31 F. 2d 255 ; and In re Holmes, 63 F.2d 642 , 20 C.C.P.A., Patents, 899. … The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Vanquish Worldwide, LLC

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 6, 2015

    Dated: 6 February 2015 4~,,v.~-- MARK N. … Worldwide, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John J. Goodrich v. Arnold C. Harmsen and Burke P. Lokey, Burke P. Lokey v. Arnold C. Harmsen and John J. Goodrich

    442 F.2d 377 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1971

    The Board erred in holding that Lokey conceived the invention of the counts at any date prior to January 29, 1962. Additionally, Goodrich cites Kratz v. … Mastoras, 257 U.S. 27 , 42 S.Ct. 20 , 66 L.Ed. 112 (1921); Tansel v. Higonnet, 215 F.2d 457 , 42 CCPA 732 (1954); and Creamer v. Kirkwood, 305 F.2d 486 , 50 CCPA 715 (1962). We agree with the board.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • 15-24 042

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

    Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). … See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303, 311 (2007) (if an examination report does not contain sufficient detail, it is incumbent upon the rating board to return the report as inadequate for rating purposes).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Phillips Petroleum Company v. C. J. Webb, Inc., by Change of Name From Chas. J. Webb Sons Co., Inc., D.B.A. Corrosion Reaction Consultants

    442 F.2d 1376 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 3, 1971

    Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Chas. J. Webb Sons Co., 150 USPQ 710 , 712 (TTAB 1966). … See: Rockwood Chocolate Co., Inc. v. Hoffman Candy Company, 54 CCPA 1061, 372 F.2d 552 , 152 USPQ 599 (1967).

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.