Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.32s
43 Fed. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 1999
When responsiveness is an issue, it must be resolved before the board can proceed. If a bid is not responsive, the protester has no more right to invoke the office of the board than the proverbial man on the street. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 730 (Fed.Cir.1997); Dalton v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 98 F.3d 1298, 1305 (Fed.Cir. 1996); Gould, Inc. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedLeslie A. Gallegos v. Department of the Air Force
2014 MSPB 53 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 17, 2014
See Burrell v. U.S. … See McCarthy v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVincent Curtis Conyers v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 8, 2025
See Euzebio v. McDonough (Euzebio II), 989 F.3d 1305, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2021). Thereafter, in August 2022, this Court affirmed the Board's decision in Mr. … Post-date Board Decision. Documents created after the Board's decision was issued cannot be included in the RBA. See Kyhn v. Shinseki, 716 F.3d 572, 578 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 I. & N. Dec. 637 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1988
Magallanes-Damian v. INS, 783 F.2d 931 (9th Cir. 1986); Paul v. INS, 521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir- 1975). … Ramirez-Durazo v. INS, 794 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1986); Lopez v. INS, 775 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1985); see also Magallanes-Damian v.
Disagreed with by Ozoa v. Holder, 356 F. App'x 63 (2009)Cited 1,879 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 14, 2021
. § 3.304 (f); see also Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 128 (1997). … Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 66 (1993); see also 38 U.S.C. § 1154(a); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeterson-Sharpe Engineering Corp. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,873 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 4, 1984
There is no rule that a board decision be rendered by the individual who presided at the hearing. Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 187 , 458 F.2d 112, 116 (1972); Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. … See Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States, 458 F.2d at 117 ; Sternberger v. United States, 401 F.2d at 1017 . In this case, the Board’s findings demonstrate that it reviewed the evidence compiled by the hearing officer.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAtlantic Monthly Co. v. Commissioner
5 T.C. 1025 · United States Tax Court · Nov 1, 1945
The term “ordinary and necessary expenses” was construed by the Supreme Court in Welch v. Helvering, 290 U. … McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 , 4 L. Ed. 579 .
Cited 3 timesPublished14 Cl. Ct. 542 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1988
See Fuller v. United States, No. C-86-20874 SW (N.D.Cal. Apr. 20, 1987). … The Court of Claims, in Friedman v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedWisconsin Cheese Group, LLC v. Comercializadora de Lácteos y Derivados, S.A. de C.V.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 30, 2016
Consolidation is discretionary with the Board, and may be ordered upon motion granted by the Board, or upon stipulation of the parties approved by the Board, or upon the Board’s own initiative. World Hockey Ass’n v. … Johnson & Johnson v. Stryker, 109 USPQ2d at 1078-79 (citing Drive Trademark Holdings LP v. Inofin, 83 USPQ2d 1433, 1435 (TTAB 2007)); Giant Food, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished81 Fed. Cl. 369 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 7, 2008
See Martinez v. … See Smith v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMoscahlades Bros. v. United States
42 C.C.P.A. 78 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 9, 1954
Skourtsis *80 v. United States, 69 Treas. Dec. 522 , T. … Thereafter, the olives are placed in barrels filled with brine, ready for shipment, and, as imported, the olives appear to be red to reddish brown to dark brown in color.
Cited 13 timesPublished450 F.2d 1121 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971
Cosgriff v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 730, 737 , 387 F. 2d 390, 394 (1967); Towell v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 422, 436 (1960). Under this interpretation the Board was correct in not applying AFM 160-1. … Farrar v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 1008 , 358 F. 2d 965 (1965); Hutter v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 517 , 345 F. 2d 828 (1965); Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 445 (1960).
Cited 9 timesPublishedRuifei (Shenzhen) Smart Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Chengyan Science And Technology Co., Ltd.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 12, 2023
The Board in Marshall Field & Co. v. Mrs. … See G&W Labs., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015
The examiner should provide information as to any functional loss due to pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination or pain on movement of a joint in accordance with DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. … The examiner should provide information as to any functional loss due to pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination or pain on movement of the knees in accordance with DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Lidbury v. Commissioner
84 T.C. 146 · United States Tax Court · Feb 4, 1985
Brown v. Commissioner, 52 T.C. 50, 66 (1969). It is settled law that a will speaks only at the time of the testator’s death. Mr. … Brown v. Commissioner, supra at 58. No transfer taxable as a gift occurred when Mrs. Lidbury died, and Mr. Lidbury’s estate includes the value of the unsold property.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCollateral Mortg. & Inv. Co. v. Commissioner
37 B.T.A. 630 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 12, 1938
COLLATERAL MORTGAGE AND INVESTMENT CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Collateral Mortg. & Inv. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 88991. … JOHN ARTHUR BROWN. J. HOWARD REBER. By W. L. STOUGH NOLL. SN C *633 Thereafter the Philadelphia Co. for Guaranteeing Mortgages took possession of the property.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2014
See Brock v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 155, 162-64 (1997); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1044 (Fed. Cir. 1994), citing 38 U.S.C.A. § 1113(b) and 1116 and 38 C.F.R § 3.303. … See Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 69, 77 (1995.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedParagon Energy Corp. v. United States
645 F.2d 966 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1981
This court has stated that agency boards of contract appeals have authority under the Contract Disputes Act to grant equitable reformation. Applied Devices Corp. v. … It was stated in Harvey v.
Cited 154 timesPublishedDepartment of Army v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 330 · United States Customs Court · Dec 5, 1950
United States v. Sherman & Sons Company, 237 U. S. 146 ; Kolynos Co. v. United States, 25 Treas. Dec. 211 , T. D. 33762; Geo. B. Reading v. United States, 46 Treas. Dec. 320 , T. D. 40457; Champion Coated Paper Co. v. … Reading v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015
This claim is no longer before the Board. See generally Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 115 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Barrera v. Gober, 122 F.3d 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166 -67 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 505 (1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna