Case law

Alexander v. United States

148 Ct. Cl. 24 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 (1919), and Bailey v. United States, 144 C. Cls. 720 . … class by two Selection Boards, including the 1952 Selection Board, shall be separated from the Service. 3.

Vogel v. Jones

486 F.2d 1068 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 11, 1973

See, for example, Steel v. Myers, 205 O.G. 1021 , 1914 C. D. 74 and De Jahn v. Gaus, 57 App. D. C. 341, 23 F.2d 762 (1927). … See Wagoner v. Barger, 463 F.2d 1377 , 59 CCPA 1213 (1972).

Carter v. United States

518 F.2d 1199 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1975

General Electric Co. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 116, 117 , 416 F. 2d 1320, 1321 (1969). We have done so. Defendant makes much of our error in citing Department of Defense Eegulations, 24 Fed. … At the opening of the board proceeding, the Senior Board Member (presiding) is to address the respondent in part as follows: * * * You have been selected to “Show Cause,” because in the opinion of a board of senior Air Force

Harbor Bancorp v. Commissioner

105 T.C. 260 · United States Tax Court · Oct 16, 1995

Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 729 (1929); Amos v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 65, 70 (1966); see Bintliff v. United States, 462 F.2d 403, 408 (5th Cir. 1972). … BFP v.

Quinton v. States States

64 Fed. Cl. 118 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2005

Case law in this Circuit has also recognized the court’s ability to review Board decisions. See Godwin v. United States, 338 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed.Cir.2003); Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir.1986); Engels v. … Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1157 (Fed.Cir.1983). Thus, because the Court of Federal Claims does not sit as a “super correction board,” Skinner v.

Boeing Co. v. United States

480 F.2d 854 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

The Board, rejecting defendant’s argument, relied largely on our decision, Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 179 Ct. … The following dictum In Taylor v.

Sappington v. Commissioner

25 B.T.A. 1385 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1932

School District v. Gage, 30 Mich. 484 ; Sullivan v. School District, 191 N.W. 1020 ; Anderson v. Board, 190 N.W. 806 ; Board v. McHenry, 106 Ohio Statutes 357; 140 N.E. 169 ; *1402 Kimare v. City, 171 Ill. 332 ; Hill v. … Board of Education, 165 N.Y. 431 ; 59 N.E. 300 ; Wiley v. Board of Education, 225 Mich. 237 ; 196 N.W. 417 ; Hartigan v. Board of Regents of W. Va. University, 49 W.Va. 14 ; 38 S.E. 698 ; cf. Burnet v.

In re Taner

681 F.2d 787 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 10, 1982

See Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 , 98 S.Ct. 2522 , 57 L.Ed.2d 451 (1978); Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 , 93 S.Ct. 253 , 34 L.Ed.2d 273 (1973). … We concluded that Gottschalk v.

Roberts v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 387 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 15, 1992

See Sammarco v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 111, 112-13 (1991); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56 (1990). … App. 289, 294 (1992); Smith v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 235, 237-38 (1991); Ohland v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 147, 150 (1991); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. United States

423 F.2d 300 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

This contract language came before us for interpretation three years ago in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 97 , 374 F.2d 516 (1967). … Defendant refers, properly we think, to Thorpe v. Housing Authority, 393 U.S. 268 , 89 S.Ct. 518 , 21 L.Ed.2d 474 (1969), as being in agreement with our position.

Murray Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management

2022 MSPB 19 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 8, 2022

See Panter v. … OPM, 3 The Board may rely on unpublished decisions of the Federal Circuit if it finds the court’s reasoning persuasive, as we do here. See Mauldin v. U.S.

Donatus U. Unara v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 4, 2015

Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 9, aff’d, 469 F. App’x 852 (Fed Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 414 (2012). … Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 713 F.3d 1111, 1121 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quoting Staats v. U.S. Postal Service, 99 F.3d 1120, 1124 (Fed. Cir. 1996)).

Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard Wegler

305 F.2d 875 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 25, 1962

The board affirmed. … Hardtmuth, Inc. v. Fabrique Suisse De Crayons Caran D’Ache S.A., 287 F.2d 599 , 48 CCPA 873. 3 . U. S.

Newsom v. United States

676 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1982

Newsom, of a decision of the Veterans Administration Board of Contract Appeals (board). 1 The board found that certain parts of the contract for hospital improvements were patently ambiguous and that, having failed to consult … Co. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , 314 F.2d 501 , 504 (1963); Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 478, 495-96 , 346 F.2d 962, 971-72 (1965). See Beacon Constr. Co. v.

Turner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2025

Turner’s claims; the Air Force Personnel Center (including its work- force development section), the board’s medical advisor, and the board’s psychological advisor all provided opinions to the board. … Keene Corp v.

B-S-H

29 I. & N. Dec. 313 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Nov 19, 2025

See INA § 240A(b)(2)(A)(i), (v), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A)(i), (v). In November 2024, the respondent filed the instant motion. II. … See Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, 587 U.S. 1, 8 (2019) (noting that when interpreting a statute, the Court focuses on the language of the statute); see also Bostock v.

DeRieux v. Five Smiths, Inc.

499 F.2d 1321 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1974

See Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); J. I. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426 , 84 S.Ct. 1555 , 12 L.Ed.2d 423 (1964). … See Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Koger v. Ball, 4 Cir., 497 F.2d 702 (1974).

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States

671 F.2d 1322 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1982

The short of it is that, without regard to Judge Grossbaum’s actual bias or prejudice, the Board decision of which he was the author cannot stand. *9 V. … United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc., 384 U.S. 424 (1966); United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963); Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 226 Ct.

Paragon Energy Corp. v. United States

645 F.2d 966 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1981

This court has stated that agency boards of contract appeals have authority under the Contract Disputes Act to grant equitable reformation. Applied Devices Corp. v. … It was stated in Harvey v.

Habermehl Consulting and Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 14, 2015

Kathryn V. Flood, Esq. … of Habermehl Consulting and Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.